journal article·2018-08Open access

Dead Ends Limit Charge Carrier Extraction from All‐Polymer Bulk Heterojunction Solar Cells

Rokas Jasiūnas, Armantas Melianas, Yuxin Xia, Nikolaos Felekidis, Vidmantas Gulbinas, Martijn Kemerink

Advanced Electronic Materials· Volume 4· Issue 8

Abstract

Abstract Extraction of photocreated charge carriers from a prototypical all‐polymer organic solar cell is investigated by combining transient photocurrent and time‐delayed collection field experiments with numerical simulations. It is found that extraction is significantly hampered by charges getting trapped in spatial traps that are tentatively attributed to dead ends in the intermixed polymer network—in photovoltaic devices based on the same donor polymer and a fullerene acceptor this effect is much weaker. The slow‐down in charge extraction leads to enhanced recombination and associated performance losses. These effects are observed in addition to the dispersive behavior that is characteristic of charge motion in energetically disordered media. Upon annealing the effects of spatial traps diminish, rationalizing the doubling in device power conversion efficiency after annealing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Conducting polymers and applications · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Center for Physical Sciences and Technology Saule·tekio av. 3 LT‐10257 Vilnius Lithuania

Biomolecular and Organic Electronics Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology (IFM) Linköping University 58183 Linköping Sweden

Complex Materials and Devices Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology (IFM) Linköping University 58183 Linköping Sweden

Funding

European Social Fund

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/jz101458y10.1021/jz101458y ↗
2. 10.1088/0034-4885/73/9/09640110.1088/0034-4885/73/9/096401 ↗
3. 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.20531810.1103/PhysRevB.81.205318 ↗
4. 10.1038/nphoton.2009.6910.1038/nphoton.2009.69 ↗
5. 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.08520510.1103/PhysRevB.72.085205 ↗
6. 10.1038/ncomms977810.1038/ncomms9778 ↗
7. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.27680310.1103/PhysRevLett.117.276803 ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.11520410.1103/PhysRevB.95.115204 ↗
9. 10.1002/aenm.20170088810.1002/aenm.201700888 ↗
10. 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.24120210.1103/PhysRevB.96.241202 ↗
11. 10.1021/jacs.7b0267710.1021/jacs.7b02677 ↗
12. 10.1021/jacs.7b1127810.1021/jacs.7b11278 ↗
13. 10.1002/adma.20160415510.1002/adma.201604155 ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.macromol.7b0083410.1021/acs.macromol.7b00834 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.46050610.1063/1.460506 ↗
16. 10.1002/cphc.20070057510.1002/cphc.200700575 ↗
17. 10.1039/C8TA01692E10.1039/C8TA01692E ↗
18. 10.1039/C6TA00531D10.1039/C6TA00531D ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.02740410.1103/PhysRevLett.103.027404 ↗
20. 10.1002/aenm.20160214310.1002/aenm.201602143 ↗
21. Lange I. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2011 · 106
22. 10.1063/1.220500710.1063/1.2205007 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.orgel.2008.06.00710.1016/j.orgel.2008.06.007 ↗
24. 10.1021/ja503301m10.1021/ja503301m ↗
25. 10.1002/aenm.20120101910.1002/aenm.201201019 ↗
26. 10.1002/aenm.20130100610.1002/aenm.201301006 ↗
27. 10.1002/adma.20110457910.1002/adma.201104579 ↗
28. 10.1021/jz200155b10.1021/jz200155b ↗