Effect of the deposition conditions of NiO anode buffer layers in organic solar cells, on the properties of these cells
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract NiO thin films deposited by DC reactive sputtering were used as anode buffer layer in organic photovoltaic cells (OPVs) based on CuPc/C60 planar heterojunctions. Firstly we show that the properties of the NiO films depend on the O2 partial pressure during deposition. The films are first conductive between 0 and 2% partial oxygen pressure, then they are semiconductor and p-type between 2 and 6% partial oxygen pressure, between 6 and 9% partial oxygen pressure the conduction is very low and the films seem to be n-type and finally, for a partial oxygen pressure higher than 9%, the conduction is p-type. The morphology of these films depends also on the O2 partial pressure. When the NiO films is thick of 4 nm, its peak to valley roughness is 6 nm, when it is sputtered with a gas containing 7.4% of oxygen, while it is more than double, 13.5 nm, when the partial pressure of oxygen is 16.67%. This roughness implies that a forming process, i.e. a decrease of the leakage current, is necessary for the OPVs. The forming process is not necessary if the NiO ABL is thick of 20 nm. In that case it is shown that optimum conversion efficiency is achieved with NiO ABL annealed 10 min at 400 °C.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Conducting polymers and applications · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Godoy · Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells · 2010 · 94 · 64810.1016/j.solmat.2009.11.003 ↗
2. Cai · Adv. Mater. · 2011 · 23 · 359010.1002/adma.201101154 ↗
3. Park · Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells · 2010 · 94 · 233210.1016/j.solmat.2010.08.004 ↗
4. Bernède · Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells · 2008 · 92 · 150810.1016/j.solmat.2008.06.016 ↗
5. Zhang · Energy Fuels · 2010 · 24 · 373910.1021/ef901325e ↗
6. Cattin · J. Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 105 · 03450710.1063/1.3077160 ↗
7. Ryu · Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells · 2011 · 95 · 301510.1016/j.solmat.2011.06.021 ↗
8. Hancox · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 99 · 01330410.1063/1.3607478 ↗
9. Park · Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells · 2010 · 94 · 233210.1016/j.solmat.2010.08.004 ↗
10. Steirer · Org. Electron · 2010 · 11 · 141410.1016/j.orgel.2010.05.008 ↗
11. Sun · Sol. Energ. Mater. Sol. Cells · 2010 · 94 · 232810.1016/j.solmat.2010.08.002 ↗
12. Betancur · Sol. Energ. Mater. Sol. Cells · 2011 · 95 · 73510.1016/j.solmat.2010.10.014 ↗
13. Irwin · Chem. Mater. · 2011 · 23 · 221810.1021/cm200229e ↗
14. Bernède · Phys. Stat. Sol. · 2012 · 209 · 129110.1002/pssa.201127428 ↗
15. Karpinski · Thin Solid Films · 2012 · 520 · 360910.1016/j.tsf.2011.12.068 ↗
16. Vancoppenolle · J. Vac. Sci. Technol. · 1999 · A 17 · 331710.1116/1.582059 ↗
17. Vancoppenolle · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2003 · 205 · 24910.1016/S0169-4332(02)01085-1 ↗
18. Sproul · Thin Solid Films · 2005 · 491 · 110.1016/j.tsf.2005.05.022 ↗
19. Depla · Thin Solid Films · 2009 · 517 · 282510.1016/j.tsf.2008.11.108 ↗
20. Pierson · Surf. Coat. Technol. · 2005 · 200 · 27610.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.02.005 ↗
21. Stanescu · Phys. Rev. B · 2003
22. Seo · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2004 · 8510.1063/1.1831560 ↗
23. Dahou · Thin Solid Films · 2010 · 518 · 611710.1016/j.tsf.2010.06.009 ↗
24. Bernède · Curr. Trends Polym. Sci. · 2001 · 6 · 13510.1016/S1360-1385(01)01915-X ↗
25. Brovelli · Synth. Met. · 2000 · 122 · 12310.1016/S0379-6779(00)01346-1 ↗
26. Berleb · Synth. Met. · 1999 · 102 · 103410.1016/S0379-6779(98)00210-0 ↗
27. Jang · Thin Solid Films · 2012 · 520 · 545110.1016/j.tsf.2012.03.111 ↗
28. Ai · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2008 · 254 · 240110.1016/j.apsusc.2007.09.051 ↗