journal article·2008-07

Influence of oxygen partial pressure on optoelectrical properties of aluminum-doped CdO thin films

R.K. Gupta, K. Ghosh, R. Patel, S.R. Mishra, P.K. Kahol

Applied Surface Science· Volume 254· Issue 18
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Highly conducting and transparent aluminum-doped CdO thin films were deposited on quartz by ablating the sintered target of CdO containing 2 wt% of aluminum with a KrF excimer laser (λ = 248 nm and pulsed duration of 20 ns). The effect of oxygen partial pressure on structural, electrical, and optical properties was studied. It is observed that the (2 0 0) plane is highly preferred for the films grown under high oxygen pressure. The conductivity, carrier concentration and mobility of the films decrease with increase in the oxygen pressure after attaining maximum. Low resistivity (2.27 × 10−5 Ω cm), and high mobility (79 cm2 V−1 s−1) is observed for the film grown under oxygen pressure of 1.0 × 10−3 mbar. The optical band gap is found varying between 2.68 and 2.90 eV for various oxygen pressure.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: ZnO doping and properties · Semiconductor materials and devices · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. Zhao · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2006 · 252 · 845110.1016/j.apsusc.2005.11.054 ↗
2. Adurodija · Thin Solid Films · 2005 · 492 · 15310.1016/j.tsf.2005.07.114 ↗
3. Saadeddin · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2007 · 253 · 524010.1016/j.apsusc.2006.11.049 ↗
4. Bhosale · Mater. Sci. Eng. B · 2005 · 122 · 6710.1016/j.mseb.2005.04.015 ↗
5. Lewis · MRS Bull. · 2000 · 25 · 2210.1557/mrs2000.147 ↗
6. Kim · J. Appl. Phys. · 1999 · 11 · 645110.1063/1.371708 ↗
7. Selvan · Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells · 2006 · 90 · 337110.1016/j.solmat.2005.09.018 ↗
8. Yang · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 89 · 05111610.1063/1.2240110 ↗
9. Maity · Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells · 2006 · 90 · 59710.1016/j.solmat.2005.05.001 ↗
10. Subramanyam · Mater. Lett. · 1998 · 35 · 21410.1016/S0167-577X(97)00246-2 ↗
11. Ueda · J. Appl. Phys. · 1998 · 84 · 617410.1063/1.368933 ↗
12. Liu · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2003 · 82 · 195010.1063/1.1562331 ↗
13. Gutierrez · Mater. Lett. · 2006 · 60 · 386610.1016/j.matlet.2006.03.131 ↗
14. Yan · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2001 · 78 · 234210.1063/1.1365410 ↗
15. Chrisey · 1994
16. Zhao · Thin Solid Films · 2002 · 413 · 20310.1016/S0040-6090(02)00344-9 ↗
17. Gupta · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2008 · 254 · 401810.1016/j.apsusc.2007.12.035 ↗
18. Van der Pauw · Philips Res. Rep. · 1958 · 13 · 1
19. Yasuhiro · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2001 · 169 · 508
20. Powder Diffraction File, JCPDS-International Center for Diffraction Data, Pennsylvania, 1972.
21. Khranovskyy · Thin Solid Films · 2006 · 515 · 47210.1016/j.tsf.2005.12.269 ↗
22. Lee · Solid State Electron. · 2002 · 46 · 47710.1016/S0038-1101(01)00307-0 ↗
23. Tak · Thin Solid Films · 2002 · 411 · 1210.1016/S0040-6090(02)00165-7 ↗
24. Zhou · Mater. Lett. · 2007 · 61 · 53110.1016/j.matlet.2006.05.004 ↗
25. Yong · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2005 · 248 · 38810.1016/j.apsusc.2005.03.093 ↗
26. Miao · Thin Solid Films · 2006 · 500 · 7010.1016/j.tsf.2005.11.012 ↗
27. Shinde · Mater. Chem. Phys. · 2006 · 96 · 32610.1016/j.matchemphys.2005.07.045 ↗
28. Saha · Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells · 2007 · 91 · 169210.1016/j.solmat.2007.05.025 ↗
29. Park · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2006 · 253 · 152210.1016/j.apsusc.2006.02.046 ↗
30. Ueda · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1998 · 84 · 617
31. Ferro · Phys. Stat. Sol. B · 2000 · 220 · 29910.1002/1521-3951(200007)220:1<299::AID-PSSB299>3.0.CO;2-Y ↗