journal article·2006-11

Enhanced hardness in B-doped ZnO thin films on fused quartz substrates by pulsed-laser deposition

Songqing Zhao, Yueliang Zhou, Yuzi Liu, Kun Zhao, Shufang Wang, Wenfeng Xiang, Zhen Liu, Peng Han, Ze Zhang, Zhenghao Chen, Huibin Lu, Kuijuan Jin, Bolin Cheng, Guozhen Yang

Applied Surface Science· Volume 253· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract B-doped ZnO thin films have been fabricated on fused quartz substrates using boron–ZnO mosaic target by pulsed-laser deposition technique, and the mechanical properties have been studied by nanoindentation continuous stiffness measurement technique and transmission electron microscope (TEM). Nanoindentation measurement revealed that the hardness of B-doped ZnO films, 9.32 ± 0.90 to 12.10 ± 1.00 GPa, is much greater than that of undoped ZnO films and very close to that of traditional semiconductor Si. The mean transmittance (%) is larger than 81% in the visible range (380–780 nm) for all the films, and the Hall effect measurement showed that the carrier density is around 2 × 1020 cm−3 and the resistivity lower than 3 × 10−3 Ω cm. TEM characteristics show undoped thin films have more amorphous area between grains while the B-doped ZnO films have thin grain boundaries. We suggest that the grain boundaries act as the strain compensation sites and the decrease in thickness of grain boundaries enhances the hardness of the B-doped ZnO films.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: ZnO doping and properties · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. Cuo · Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2001 · 40 · L17710.1143/JJAP.40.L177 ↗
2. Cao · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1999 · 82 · 27810.1103/PhysRevLett.82.2278 ↗
3. Nause · III–Vs Rev. · 1999 · 12 · 28
4. Look · Mater. Sci. Eng. B · 2001 · 80 · 38310.1016/S0921-5107(00)00604-8 ↗
5. Bradby · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2002 · 80 · 453710.1063/1.1486264 ↗
6. Mayo · J. Mater. Res. · 1992 · 7 · 97310.1557/JMR.1992.0973 ↗
7. Prasad · Wear · 1997 · 203/204 · 49810.1016/S0043-1648(96)07448-0 ↗
8. Coleman · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 86 · 20310510.1063/1.1929874 ↗
9. Kucheyev · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2002 · 80 · 95610.1063/1.1448175 ↗
10. Klopfstein · Phys. Status Solidi A · 2003 · 196 · R110.1002/pssa.200306429 ↗
11. Huang · Philos. Mag. · 2004 · 84 · 123310.1080/14786430310001653116 ↗
12. Zeng · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2002 · 197–198 · 36210.1016/S0169-4332(02)00425-7 ↗
13. Wang · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2003 · 218 · 2410.1016/S0169-4332(03)00587-7 ↗
14. Hayamizu · J. Appl. Phys. · 1996 · 80 · 78710.1063/1.362887 ↗
15. Wang · Supercond. Sci. Technol. · 2001 · 14 · 88510.1088/0953-2048/14/11/301 ↗
16. Lee · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1999 · 74 · 315510.1063/1.124095 ↗
17. Norton · Mater. Sci. Eng. R · 2004 · 43 · 13910.1016/j.mser.2003.12.002 ↗
18. Sun · J. Appl. Phys. · 1999 · 86 · 40810.1063/1.370744 ↗
19. Chen · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2004 · 223 · 31810.1016/j.apsusc.2003.09.015 ↗
20. Li · Mater. Charact. · 2002 · 48 · 1110.1016/S1044-5803(02)00192-4 ↗
21. Oliver · J. Mater. Res. · 1992 · 7 · 156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
22. Gao · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2003 · 91 · 550210.1103/PhysRevLett.91.015502 ↗