Elimination of GeO2 and Ge3N4 interfacial transition regions and defects at n-type Ge interfaces: A pathway for formation of n-MOS devices on Ge substrates
Source abstract
Abstract
The contribution from relatively low-K SiON interfacial transition regions (ITRs) between Si and transition metal (TM) gate dielectrics places a significant limitation on equivalent oxide thickness (EOT) scaling for Si complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) devices. This limitation is equally significant and limiting for Ge CMOS devices. Low-K Ge-based ITRs in Ge devices have also been shown to limit performance and reliability, particular for n-MOS field effect transistors. This article identifies the source of significant electron trapping at interfaces between n-Ge or inverted p-Ge, and Ge oxide, nitride and oxynitride ITRs. This is shown to be an interfacial band alignment issue in which native Ge ITRs have conduction band offset energies smaller than those of TM dielectrics, and trap electrons for negative Ge substrate bias. This article also describes a novel remote plasma processing approach for effectively eliminating any significant native Ge ITRs and using a plasma-processing/annealing process sequence for bonding TM gate dielectrics directly to the Ge substrate surface.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design · Silicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Chui · J. Appl. Phys. · 2005 · 97 · 11351810.1063/1.1922090 ↗
2. Chui · IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. · 2006 · 53 · 150110.1109/TED.2006.875808 ↗
3. Takagi · Microelectron. Eng. · 2007 · 84 · 231410.1016/j.mee.2007.04.129 ↗
4. Krishnamohan · Microelectron. Eng. · 2007 · 84 · 206310.1016/j.mee.2007.04.085 ↗
5. Johnson · J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A · 2000 · 18 · 123010.1116/1.582331 ↗
6. Lucovsky · Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 46 · 189910.1143/JJAP.46.1899 ↗
7. Lucovsky · J. Mol. Struct. · 2007 · 838 · 18710.1016/j.molstruc.2007.01.010 ↗
8. Pasajova · Czech. J. Phys. B · 1969 · 19 · 126510.1007/BF01690313 ↗
9. Bohac · Vacuum · 1990 · 41 · 146810.1016/0042-207X(90)93992-R ↗
10. Cohen · J. Phys. Chem. Solids · 1958 · 7 · 30110.1016/0022-3697(58)90281-6 ↗
11. Hu · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1992 · 61 · 109810.1063/1.107680 ↗
12. Maeda · J. Appl. Phys. · 2006 · 100 · 01410110.1063/1.2206395 ↗
13. Chui · IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. · 2006 · 53 · 150910.1109/TED.2006.875812 ↗
14. Afanas’ev · Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. · 2006 · 9 · 76410.1016/j.mssp.2006.08.020 ↗
15. H. Seo, D.E. Aspnes, et al. (unpublished).
16. Niimi · J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B · 1999 · 17 · 261010.1116/1.591034 ↗
17. S. Lee, J.P. Long, H. Seo, X.J. Zhou, et al., Appl. Surface Sci., submitted to.
18. 1952
19. R. Vasic, M.D. Urlich, B-K. Chung, et al. (unpublished).
20. Chen · IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. · 2007 · 54 · 193110.1109/TNS.2007.910862 ↗