journal article·2008-07

Interface characterization and current conduction in HfO2-gated MOS capacitors

H.W. Chen, F.C. Chiu, C.H. Liu, S.Y. Chen, H.S. Huang, P.C. Juan, H.L. Hwang

Applied Surface Science· Volume 254· Issue 19
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Metal-oxide-semiconductor (MOS) capacitors incorporating hafnium dioxide (HfO2) dielectrics were fabricated and investigated. In this work, the electrical and interfacial properties were characterized based on capacitance–voltage (C–V) and current–voltage (I–V) measurements. Thereafter the current conduction mechanism, electron effective mass (m*), mean density of interface traps per unit area and energy ( D ¯ it ), energy distribution of interface traps density and near-interface oxide traps density (NNIOT) were studied in details. The characterization reveals that the dominant conduction mechanism in the region of high temperature and high field is Schottky emission. The mean density of interface traps per unit area and energy is about 6.3 × 1012 cm−2 eV−1 by using high–low frequency capacitance method. The maximum Dit is about 7.76 × 1012 cm−2 eV−1 located at 0.27 eV above the valence band.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices · Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. Yang · IEDM Tech. Dig. · 1999 · 453
2. Lo · IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 1997 · 18 · 20910.1109/55.568766 ↗
3. Timp · IEDM Tech. Dig. · 1997 · 93010.1109/IEDM.1997.650534 ↗
4. Stathis · Int. Electron Devices Meeting Tech. Dig. · 1998 · 167
5. Misra · TENCON · 2004 · 320
6. Wilk · J. Appl. Phys. · 2001 · 89 · 524310.1063/1.1361065 ↗
7. Lee · IEDM Tech. Dig. · 1999 · 133
8. Gusev · IEDM Tech. Dig. · 2001 · 451
9. Iwai · IEDM Tech. Dig. · 2002 · 625
10. Lin · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2002 · 81 · 204110.1063/1.1506207 ↗
11. Robertson · J. Vac. Sci. Technol. · 2000 · 18 · 178510.1116/1.591472 ↗
12. Hubbard · J. Mater. Res. · 1996 · 11 · 275710.1557/JMR.1996.0350 ↗
13. Kang · IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2000 · 21 · 18110.1109/55.830975 ↗
14. Zhu · IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2002 · 23 · 9710.1109/55.981318 ↗
15. Xu · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2002 · 80 · 197510.1063/1.1435411 ↗
16. Kim · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2004 · 84 · 206410.1063/1.1667621 ↗
17. Cohen · IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 1995 · 42 · 200410.1109/16.469410 ↗
18. Buchanan · J. Appl. Phys. · 1990 · 67 · 743910.1063/1.344534 ↗
19. Zvanut · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1989 · 54 · 211810.1063/1.101512 ↗
20. Druijf · J. Appl. Phys. · 1996 · 79 · 150510.1063/1.360992 ↗
21. Fleetwood · IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. · 1992 · 39 · 26910.1109/23.277495 ↗
22. Hori · 1997
23. Masson · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2002 · 81 · 339210.1063/1.1518561 ↗
24. Mudanai · IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2002 · 23 · 72810.1109/LED.2002.805753 ↗
25. Schmidt · Microelectronic Eng. · 2005 · 80 · 7010.1016/j.mee.2005.04.023 ↗
26. Balog · Thin Solid Films · 1977 · 41 · 24710.1016/0040-6090(77)90312-1 ↗
27. Chiu · J. Appl. Phys. · 2006 · 100 · 11410210.1063/1.2401657 ↗