Localization and other properties of electronic states in a semiconductor revealed by their response to surface doping and band-bending potential
Source abstract
Abstract
Using photoelectron spectroscopy (PES), we study InAs(001) and InAs(110) surfaces, doped with Te atoms to induce strong band-bending phenomena and a formation of two-dimensional electron gases (2DEGs). The band structure of the 2DEGs as well as the coexisting 3D bulk electronic structure are investigated. We discuss several schemes to estimate the band-bending potentials at surfaces by PES methods, appropriate in different situations, e.g. in the presence of a significant band tailing. We use the Schroedinger–Poisson scheme as well as the Thomas–Fermi method to model the band-bending potential profiles and the 2DEG band energies. For the InAs crystal we find that the valence bands investigated with PES closely follow the band-bending potential which evidences that valence electronic states are localized to within few nm. In contrast, the conduction band is entirely insensitive to the band-bending potential, evidencing that the extent of electronic states within this band is at least 1 0 3 nm . • We study n-doped InAs surfaces showing strong band-bending and a formation of 2DEG. • The band-bending potential is a physical phenomenon, sole band-bending is confusing. • We discuss schemes to estimate the band-bending potentials in different situations. • We find the valence band states localized and the conduction band states delocalized.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Topological Materials and Phenomena · Advanced Semiconductor Detectors and Materials · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (76)
Show source-provided references
1. Schottky · Physics · 1939 · 113 · 367
2. Mott · Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. · 1939 · 171 · p27
3. Zhang · J. Chem. Rev. · 2012 · 112 · 552010.1021/cr3000626 ↗
4. Leon · J. Phys. Chem. C (Phys. Prop. Mater. Interfaces) · 2021 · 125 · 3206
5. Huang · Adv. Mat. · 2024
6. Chang · Appl. Phys. Express · 2013 · 6
7. Mondal · Solid State Commun. · 2014 · 197 · 2010.1016/j.ssc.2014.08.011 ↗
8. Umanski · J. Cryst. Growth · 2009 · 165810.1016/j.jcrysgro.2008.09.151 ↗
9. Tschirky · Phys. Rev. B · 2017 · 9510.1103/PhysRevB.95.115304 ↗
10. Kostakis · IET Optoelectron. · 2013 · 8 · 3310.1049/iet-opt.2013.0057 ↗
11. Baig · Nano Lett. · 2017 · 17 · 260310.1021/acs.nanolett.7b00401 ↗
12. Hur · Sci. Rep. · 2016 · 6 · 2200110.1038/srep22001 ↗
13. 2022
14. Sau · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 10410.1103/PhysRevLett.104.040502 ↗
15. Alicea · Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 8110.1103/PhysRevB.81.125318 ↗
16. Lutchyn · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 10510.1103/PhysRevLett.105.077001 ↗
17. Lutchyn · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2017 · 11910.1103/PhysRevLett.119.057002 ↗
18. Thomas · Phys. Rev. Mater. · 2018 · 2
19. Virtanen · Phys. Rev. B · 2018 · 9810.1103/PhysRevB.98.020501 ↗
20. Lee · Nano Lett. · 2019 · 19 · 308310.1021/acs.nanolett.9b00494 ↗
21. Mittag · Phys. Rev. B · 2019 · 10010.1103/PhysRevB.100.075422 ↗
22. Lei · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2019 · 115
23. Casparis · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2018 · 13 · 91510.1038/s41565-018-0207-y ↗
24. Graziano · Phys. Rev. B · 2020 · 10110.1103/PhysRevB.101.054510 ↗
25. Awschalom · Physics · 2009 · 2 · 5010.1103/Physics.2.50 ↗
26. Premasiri · J. Phys. Condens. Matter · 2019 · 3110.1088/1361-648X/ab04c7 ↗
27. Martinez · Phys. Rev. Appl. · 2020 · 1310.1103/PhysRevApplied.13.014030 ↗
28. Zawadzki · Adv. Phys. · 1974 · 23 · 34510.1080/00018737400101371 ↗
29. Noguchi · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1991 · 66 · 224310.1103/PhysRevLett.66.2243 ↗
30. Weber · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 97
31. Love · Surf. Sci. · 2003 · 523 · 17910.1016/S0039-6028(02)02416-0 ↗
32. Aristov · Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 60 · 775210.1103/PhysRevB.60.7752 ↗
33. Olsson · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1996 · 76 · 362610.1103/PhysRevLett.76.3626 ↗
34. Betti · Phys. Rev. B · 2001 · 6310.1103/PhysRevB.63.155315 ↗
35. Karlsson · Surf. Sci. · 1998 · 402-404 · 59010.1016/S0039-6028(98)00002-8 ↗
36. N. Tomaszewska, L. Walczak, J. Lis, J.J. Kolodziej, Surf. Sci. 632, 103.10.1016/j.susc.2014.09.019 ↗
37. Olszowska · Surf. Sci. · 2016 · 644 · 9510.1016/j.susc.2015.09.007 ↗
38. Veal · Phys. Rev. B · 2001 · 6410.1103/PhysRevB.64.085311 ↗
39. Goryl · Surf. Sci. · 2011 · 605 · 207310.1016/j.susc.2011.08.008 ↗
40. Olszowska · Phys. Rev. B · 2016 · 9410.1103/PhysRevB.94.115305 ↗
41. Wutke · Phys. Rev. B · 2023 · 10710.1103/PhysRevB.107.155139 ↗
42. Kim · Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 80
43. Fang · J. Appl. Phys. · 1990 · 67 · 703410.1063/1.345050 ↗
44. Powell · 2010
45. Bourke · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 10410.1103/PhysRevLett.104.206601 ↗
46. Pi · J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. · 2000 · 107 · 16310.1016/S0368-2048(00)00099-2 ↗
47. Antonsson · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2023 · 25 · 1517310.1039/D3CP01284K ↗
48. Offi · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. · 2010 · 22
49. Zdyb · Phys. Rev. B · 2013 · 8710.1103/PhysRevB.87.075436 ↗
50. Seah · Surf. Interface Anal. · 1979 · 1 · 210.1002/sia.740010103 ↗
51. Chambers · J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B · 2004 · 22 · 220510.1116/1.1768525 ↗
52. Chen · Phys. Lett. A · 2016 · 380 · 97010.1016/j.physleta.2015.12.038 ↗
53. Zhang · IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices · 2017 · 64 · 403610.1109/TED.2017.2733547 ↗
54. Gansukh · Sci. Rep. · 2020 · 1838810.1038/s41598-020-73828-0 ↗
55. Veal · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 89
56. Liu · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2015 · 107
57. Fares · ECS J. Solid State Technol. · 2019 · 8 · Q315410.1149/2.0281907jss ↗
58. If the integrated angle-resolved spectra are used than, close to the edge, the parabolic approximation is justified. To within small Δky range defined with a spectrometer slitwidth the uptake-function bears the similarity to the parabolic 3D DOS. If the energy distribution curve is used, it is more similar to the 2D DOS. Within the one-electron model both forms increase vertically at the edge. The InAs VB close to the VBM is composed of two aligned bands (lh, hh) but the DOS is simply additive, and thus the model uptake-function remains sharp at the VB edge.
59. Olsson · Phys. Rev. B · 1995 · 52 · 646
60. Horn · Appl. Phys. A · 1990 · 51 · 28910.1007/BF00324309 ↗
61. Kakushima · J. Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 10410.1063/1.3021461 ↗
62. King · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 10410.1103/PhysRevLett.104.256803 ↗
63. Betti · Solid State Commun. · 1999 · 110 · 66110.1016/S0038-1098(99)00156-8 ↗
64. Aristov · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2000 · 166 · 26310.1016/S0169-4332(00)00402-5 ↗
65. Yu · 2010 · 223
66. Luth · 2001 · 333
67. Palankowski · Mater. Sci. Eng. B · 1999 · 66 · 4610.1016/S0921-5107(99)00118-X ↗
68. Bergren · Phys. Rev. B · 1971 · 24 · 4704
69. Trankle · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1987 · 58 · 41910.1103/PhysRevLett.58.419 ↗
70. Das Sarma · Phys. Rev. B · 1989 · 39 · 551610.1103/PhysRevB.39.5516 ↗
71. Kane · Phys. Rev. · 1963 · 131 · 7910.1103/PhysRev.131.79 ↗
72. Orlova · Phys. Status Solidi · 1979 · 93 · 50310.1002/pssb.2220930206 ↗
73. Bell · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 1996 · 104/105 · 1710.1016/S0169-4332(96)00115-8 ↗
74. Bell · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1997 · 71 · 368810.1063/1.120482 ↗
75. King · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 101
76. Watanabe · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 1997 · 117/118 · 73510.1016/S0169-4332(97)80174-2 ↗