Compositional dependence of the electronic structures of Co2FeSi x Al1− x /Ge half-metal/semiconductor interfaces
Source abstract
Abstract
The performances of Co-based Heusler alloys in spintronic devices are often degraded by interfacial effects. We used density functional theory to analyze the electronic structures of Co2FeSixAl1−x/Ge interfaces with Si content x from 0 to 1.0. Consistent with experimental data, interfaces with an antiparallel epitaxial relationship are more stable than those with a parallel epitaxy by ∼0.4 eV/supercell. The interfacial spin polarization of the more stable antiparallel interfaces varies significantly with composition, decreasing from ∼40% for an Al-rich interface (x = 0) to −24% at x = 1. Furthermore, local potential calculations show that the Co2FeAl/Ge interface has a better band alignment, with an energy barrier of 0.4 eV for majority spin-up electron injection, which increases to 0.5 eV for the Co2FeSi/Ge interface. These results suggest that Al-rich interfaces enable a more efficient spin injection into Ge, highlighting interfacial atomic control as a key strategy for optimization of spintronic heterostructures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Heusler alloys: electronic and magnetic properties · Magnetic properties of thin films · Semiconductor materials and interfaces
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Technical Sciences, Mother Theresa University 1 , 1669 11A, Skopje,
Department of Physics, University of York, Heslington 2 , YO10 5DD, York,
Institute of Physics, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University 3 , Arhimedova 3, Skopje,
Funding
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2004 · 76 · 32310.1103/RevModPhys.76.323 ↗
2. Nat. Mater. · 2012 · 11 · 40010.1038/nmat3293 ↗
3. Nat. Phys. · 2007 · 3 · 15310.1038/nphys551 ↗
4. Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2008 · 80 · 31510.1103/revmodphys.80.315 ↗
5. npj Spintron. · 2025 · 3 · 1010.1038/s44306-024-00070-z ↗
6. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2007 · 46 · 66810.1002/anie.200601815 ↗
7. J. Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 101 · 02391510.1063/1.2424529 ↗
8. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2016 · 108 · 17241210.1063/1.4948466 ↗
9. Phys. Rev. B · 2000 · 62 · R479010.1103/physrevb.62.r4790 ↗
10. Appl. Phys. A · 2013 · 111 · 42310.1007/s00339-013-7679-2 ↗
11. MRS Bull. · 2022 · 47 · 59310.1557/s43577-022-00350-1 ↗
12. Phys. Rev. B · 2018 · 98 · 11530410.1103/physrevb.98.115304 ↗
13. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2009 · 102 · 24660110.1103/physrevlett.102.246601 ↗
14. Sci. Rep. · 2016 · 6 · 3728210.1038/srep37282 ↗
15. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2016 · 28 · 39500310.1088/0953-8984/28/39/395003 ↗
16. Z. Kristallogr.-Crystalline Mater. · 2005 · 220 · 56710.1524/zkri.220.5.567.65075 ↗
17. Phys. Rev. Appl. · 2025 · 23 · L05100510.1103/physrevapplied.23.l051005 ↗
18. Phys. Rev. B · 2022 · 105 · 19530810.1103/physrevb.105.195308 ↗
19. Phys. Rev. Appl. · 2017 · 8 · 01400710.1103/PhysRevApplied.8.014007 ↗
20. NPG Asia Mater. · 2020 · 12 · 4710.1038/s41427-020-0228-5 ↗
21. J. Appl. Phys. · 2021 · 129 · 18390110.1063/5.0048321 ↗
22. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 42 · 08400210.1088/0022-3727/42/8/084002 ↗
23. Phys. Rev. B · 2001 · 63 · 03331110.1103/physrevb.63.033311 ↗
24. Comput. Phys. Commun. · 2014 · 185 · 147710.1016/j.cpc.2014.02.013 ↗
25. J. Appl. Crystallogr. · 2011 · 44 · 127210.1107/s0021889811038970 ↗
26. J. Open Source Software · 2018 · 3 · 71710.21105/joss.00717 ↗