journal article·2021-08-01Open access

Simulation of the effect of polarization Coulomb field scattering on device linearity in AlGaN/GaN heterostructure field effect transistors using the Monte Carlo method

Yongxiong Yang, Zhaojun Lin, Mingyan Wang, Heng Zhou, Yang Liu, Guangyuan Jiang

AIP Advances· Volume 11· Issue 8

Abstract

This paper demonstrates the improvement of device linearity in AlGaN/GaN heterostructure field effect transistors (HFETs) using polarization Coulomb field (PCF) scattering and investigates the relationship between device linearity and PCF scattering under 10 and 20 V drain bias. The mobility of the gate-to-source region in AlGaN/GaN HFETs is calculated using the Monte Carlo method. We find that PCF scattering decreases with an increase in gate bias (from −3 to −0.5 V) under high field conditions, leading to lower gate-to-source resistance. Under 20 V drain bias, linearity is worse than under 10 V drain bias. The transconductance drop is significant in AlGaN/GaN HFETs, which damages linearity. By adopting an appropriate drain bias, PCF scattering can alleviate transconductance drop and improve the linearity of AlGaN/GaN HFETs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials · Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies · Ga2O3 and related materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Microelectronics, Institute of Novel Semiconductors, Shandong University , Jinan 250100, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. · 2018 · 65 · 15110.1109/tcsii.2017.2677745 ↗
2. IEEE Microwave Wireless Compon. Lett. · 2018 · 28 · 43710.1109/lmwc.2018.2812107 ↗
3. IEEE Microwave Wireless Compon. Lett. · 2018 · 28 · 43410.1109/lmwc.2018.2811338 ↗
4. IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. · 2008 · 56 · 223710.1109/tmtt.2008.2003529 ↗
5. IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. · 2015 · 63 · 258910.1109/tmtt.2015.2447552 ↗
6. IEEE Microwave Wireless Compon. Lett. · 2003 · 13 · 37010.1109/lmwc.2003.817130 ↗
7. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2007 · 54 · 258910.1109/ted.2007.904476 ↗
8. IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2013 · 34 · 136410.1109/led.2013.2279882 ↗
9. Solid-State Electron. · 2016 · 115 · 6010.1016/j.sse.2015.10.008 ↗
10. IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2012 · 33 · 70910.1109/led.2012.2187169 ↗
11. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2005 · 52 · 31110.1109/TED.2005.843966 ↗
12. IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2013 · 60 · 321610.1109/TED.2013.2265320 ↗
13. J. Appl. Phys. · 2016 · 119 · 22450110.1063/1.4953645 ↗
14. AIP Adv. · 2020 · 10 · 07521210.1063/5.0012615 ↗
15. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2016 · 63 · 390810.1109/ted.2016.2597156 ↗
16. J. Appl. Phys. · 2017 · 122 · 12450810.1063/1.5005518 ↗
17. Sci. Rep. · 2018 · 8 · 98310.1038/s41598-018-19510-y ↗
18. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2016 · 63 · 147110.1109/ted.2016.2532919 ↗
19. Phys. E · 2020 · 119 · 11402710.1016/j.physe.2020.114027 ↗
20. J. Appl. Phys. · 1997 · 82 · 164910.1063/1.365963 ↗
21. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2017 · 64 · 103810.1109/ted.2017.2654262 ↗
22. J. Appl. Phys. · 2000 · 87 · 33410.1063/1.371866 ↗
23. J. Appl. Phys. · 2017 · 121 · 20450110.1063/1.4983761 ↗
24. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 1985 · 32 · 243110.1109/t-ed.1985.22291 ↗
25. Microelectron. J. · 2008 · 39 · 118110.1016/j.mejo.2008.01.043 ↗
26. J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. · 2014 · 25 · 46610.1007/s10854-013-1611-6 ↗