Compensation effects on hole transport in C-doped p-type GaPN dilute nitrides
Source abstract
Abstract
Experimental studies of transport in GaPN dilute nitrides have evidenced low hole mobilities, which limit their applications in optoelectronics. Theoretical work to date has not explained the origin of such low hole mobilities. Here, we use full band cellular Monte Carlo methods to investigate hole transport in C-doped GaPN dilute nitrides as a function of hole concentration. Good agreement between simulation and experiment is obtained by introducing a doping-dependent self-compensation. The results suggest that the reduction in the hole mobility is caused by the compensation for the p-type C doping, which is likely due to the formation of C–N complexes that act as donor scattering centers. This agrees well with the low C activation ratio reported by Liu et al. [Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 032106 (2010)] and other studies on C–N complexes in GaP.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials · Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices · Radio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Electrical, Computer and Energy Engineering, Arizona State University , Tempe, Arizona 85281, USA
Funding
National Science Foundation
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 2 · 1992 · 31 · L85310.1143/jjap.31.l853 ↗
2. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1992 · 60 · 254010.1063/1.106906 ↗
3. Phys. Rev. B · 1995 · 51 · 1056810.1103/physrevb.51.10568 ↗
4. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2001 · 79 · 130610.1063/1.1395519 ↗
5. Physica B · 2012 · 407 · 11210.1016/j.physb.2011.09.135 ↗
6. 2002 · 864
7. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 88 · 09211010.1063/1.2181627 ↗
8. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 99 · 07110910.1063/1.3624927 ↗
9. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2001 · 79 · 415110.1063/1.1425451 ↗
10. J. Cryst. Growth · 1998 · 195 · 40110.1016/s0022-0248(98)00563-6 ↗
11. Semicond. Sci. Technol. · 2002 · 17 · 76910.1088/0268-1242/17/8/305 ↗
12. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2003 · 83 · 373110.1063/1.1622444 ↗
13. Phys. Rev. B · 2001 · 64 · 11520810.1103/physrevb.64.115208 ↗
14. Phys. Rev. B · 2001 · 64 · 113308110.1103/physrevb.64.113308 ↗
15. J. Cryst. Growth · 2003 · 251 · 39210.1016/s0022-0248(02)02201-7 ↗
16. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 96 · 03210610.1063/1.3291664 ↗
17. J. Cryst. Growth · 2017 · 473 · 5510.1016/j.jcrysgro.2017.05.025 ↗
18. Phys. Status Solidi C · 2010 · 7 · 249810.1002/pssc.200983851 ↗
19. Phys. Rev. B · 1988 · 38 · 972110.1103/physrevb.38.9721 ↗
20. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2000 · 47 · 190910.1109/16.870571 ↗
21. Phys. Rev. B · 1998 · 57 · 649310.1103/physrevb.57.6493 ↗
22. J. Appl. Phys. · 2020 · 127 · 07570310.1063/1.5140482 ↗
23. IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. · 2011 · 10 · 146410.1109/tnano.2011.2166164 ↗
24. J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. · 1977 · 10 · 158910.1088/0022-3719/10/10/003 ↗
25. J. Appl. Phys. · 1969 · 40 · 294510.1063/1.1658106 ↗
26. Phys. Rev. B · 2003 · 67 · 08120210.1103/physrevb.67.081202 ↗
27. J. Appl. Phys. · 1983 · 54 · 246810.1063/1.332362 ↗
28. Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 72 · 04520310.1103/physrevb.72.045203 ↗
29. Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 77 · 19520910.1103/physrevb.77.195209 ↗