Gate dielectric layer mitigated device degradation of AlGaN/GaN-based devices under proton irradiation
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study, the simulations of AlGaN/GaN-based devices, including AlGaN/GaN high electron mobility transistor (HEMT), Al2O3 metal–oxide–semiconductor high electron mobility transistor (MOSHEMT), and SiNx metal–insulator–semiconductor high electron mobility transistor (MISHEMT), were studied to investigate the degradation mechanism after proton irradiation. The vacancies produced by proton irradiation, especially Ga vacancy (VGa), are found to be responsible for the device degradation by carrier removal and mobility degradation, which directly influence the saturation drain current and maximum transconductance of AlGaN/GaN-based devices. Furthermore, AlGaN/GaN HEMTs with gate dielectrics (Al2O3, SiNx) exhibit better irradiation resistance than traditional AlGaN/GaN HEMTs, which produce fewer vacancies at the channel after proton irradiation. Al2O3 MOSHEMTs also show better performance than SiNx MISHEMTs in resisting proton damage. Therefore, a high-quality dielectric layer is a key factor to improve the reliability of AlGaN/GaN-based devices after proton irradiation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials · Ga2O3 and related materials · ZnO doping and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electronics and Key Laboratory of Polar Materials and Devices (MOE), East China Normal University 1 , Shanghai 200241, China
State Key Laboratory of ASIC and System, School of Microelectronics, Fudan University 2 , Shanghai 200433, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality · Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Proc. IEEE · 2008 · 96 · 28710.1109/jproc.2007.911060 ↗
2. J. Appl. Phys. · 1999 · 86 · 110.1063/1.371145 ↗
3. IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 1996 · 17 · 45510.1109/55.536291 ↗
4. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. · 2020 · 2 · 98010.1021/acsaelm.0c00048 ↗
5. AIP Adv. · 2020 · 10 · 06511110.1063/5.0007650 ↗
6. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2001 · 79 · 283210.1063/1.1412591 ↗
7. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 86 · 06350110.1063/1.1861122 ↗
8. AIP Adv. · 2020 · 10 · 12501710.1063/5.0023735 ↗
9. Phys. Status Solidi C · 2007 · 4 · 270010.1002/pssc.200674769 ↗
10. AIP Adv. · 2021 · 11 · 10520410.1063/5.0064695 ↗
11. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2012 · 59 · 265010.1109/ted.2012.2208463 ↗
12. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. · 2019 · 8 · Q24510.1149/2.0251912jss ↗
13. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B · 2018 · 36 · 05220210.1116/1.5049596 ↗
14. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. · 2016 · 5 · Q3510.1149/2.0251602jss ↗
15. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. · 2020 · 67 · 133910.1109/tns.2020.2974916 ↗
16. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. · 2003 · 50 · 179110.1109/tns.2003.820792 ↗
17. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2019 · 52 · 33510410.1088/1361-6463/ab2033 ↗
18. Microelectron. Reliab. · 2011 · 51 · 216810.1016/j.microrel.2011.04.022 ↗
19. J. Appl. Phys. · 2004 · 95 · 385110.1063/1.1682673 ↗
20. IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2014 · 35 · 82610.1109/led.2014.2331001 ↗
21. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. · 2004 · 51 · 380110.1109/tns.2004.839199 ↗
22. Radiat. Phys. Chem. · 2021 · 184 · 10947310.1016/j.radphyschem.2021.109473 ↗