Impurity charge compensation in graphene by a polarized ferroelectric polymer and its effect on charge transport near the Dirac point
Source abstract
Abstract
Charge transport near the Dirac point (DP) was investigated in graphene using ferroelectric (FE) gating in the temperature range of 300 < T < 350 K. We observed that the conductivity (σ) near the DP had a positive temperature gradient that switched to a negative temperature gradient with increasing temperature. The switch to a negative temperature gradient shifted to higher temperatures and gradually weakened upon moving away from the DP. Impurity charge compensation via polarization of the FE together with a temperature-dependent graphene–impurity charge separation was proposed as being responsible for the non-monotonicity in σ(T). A self-consistent theory for graphene transport with impurity charge scattering and phonon scattering was used to analyze the results. Non-monotonic charge transport was also observed in the temperature dependence of the residual conductivity (σr). Theoretical analysis of both σ and σr revealed a temperature independent contribution of ∼1.16e2h that is probably inherent to pristine graphene.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Thermal properties of materials · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physics and Electronics, University of Puerto Rico 1 , Humacao, Puerto Rico 00791, USA
Electrical and Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania 2 , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania 3 , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
Funding
Division of Materials Research
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Nat. Mater. · 2007 · 6 · 18310.1038/nmat1849 ↗
2. Science · 2004 · 306 · 66610.1126/science.1102896 ↗
3. Nature · 2005 · 438 · 19710.1038/nature04233 ↗
4. Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2009 · 81 · 10910.1103/revmodphys.81.109 ↗
5. Nature · 2009 · 458 · 87710.1038/nature07919 ↗
6. Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2008 · 3 · 27010.1038/nnano.2008.83 ↗
7. ACS Nano · 2008 · 2 · 203710.1021/nn800354m ↗
8. Carbon · 2012 · 50 · 172710.1016/j.carbon.2011.12.008 ↗
9. Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 84 · 03542110.1103/physrevb.84.035421 ↗
10. Eur. Phys. J.: Spec. Top. · 2007 · 148 · 1510.1140/epjst/e2007-00221-9 ↗
11. Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2008 · 3 · 20610.1038/nnano.2008.58 ↗
12. Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 80 · 23540210.1103/physrevb.80.235402 ↗
13. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2011 · 107 · 20660110.1103/physrevlett.107.206601 ↗
14. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2009 · 102 · 23680510.1103/physrevlett.102.236805 ↗
15. J. Appl. Phys. · 2020 · 127 · 12550310.1063/5.0003099 ↗
16. Nat. Phys. · 2008 · 4 · 37710.1038/nphys935 ↗
17. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2007 · 104 · 1839210.1073/pnas.0704772104 ↗
18. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2007 · 98 · 18680610.1103/physrevlett.98.186806 ↗
19. Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 82 · 08140910.1103/PhysRevB.82.081409 ↗
20. Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 79 · 16540410.1103/physrevb.79.165404 ↗
21. Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 77 · 11544910.1103/PhysRevB.77.115449 ↗
22. Ferroelectrics · 1992 · 135 · 40110.1080/00150199208230041 ↗
23. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2007 · 99 · 21660210.1103/physrevlett.99.216602 ↗
24. Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 77 · 19541510.1103/physrevb.77.195415 ↗
25. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1995 · 66 · 328110.1063/1.113730 ↗
26. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 94 · 16350510.1063/1.3119215 ↗
27. Nanotechnology · 2018 · 29 · 13400210.1088/1361-6528/aaa852 ↗
28. Solid-State Electron. · 2018 · 144 · 9010.1016/j.sse.2018.03.008 ↗
29. Carbon · 2016 · 96 · 69510.1016/j.carbon.2015.10.006 ↗
30. Nanotechnology · 2013 · 24 · 17520210.1088/0957-4484/24/17/175202 ↗
31. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. · 2020 · 2 · 210.1021/acsaelm.9b00532 ↗
32. Sci. Rep. · 2014 · 4 · 477210.1038/srep04772 ↗
33. Eur. Phys. J.: Spec. Top. · 2007 · 148 · 6310.1140/epjst/e2007-00226-4 ↗