journal article·2021-05-01Open access

Potential error from using ZT to optimize thermoelectric performance

Matt Beekman, Jean F. Ghantous, Kyle Thomson

AIP Advances· Volume 11· Issue 5

Abstract

Despite known shortcomings, the dimensionless figure of merit, ZT, continues to be the most widely used material performance metric in thermoelectrics research. Here, we expose yet another potential drawback of using the ZT to evaluate new thermoelectric materials. Specifically, by comparison with more accurate methods of estimating thermoelectric material energy conversion efficiency, we find that using the ZT as the optimization criterion could possibly lead to erroneous conclusions about the optimal doping density when optimizing performance. Using a simple semiconductor model, we find that optimal doping densities as determined using the ZT could be in error by a factor of two or more, potentially contributing a relatively small but non-negligible loss in device efficiency that could be easily avoided by using modern methods for estimation of material conversion efficiency.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Thermoelectric Materials and Devices · Thermal properties of materials · Thermal Radiation and Cooling Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics, California Polytechnic State University 1 , San Luis Obispo, California 93402, USA

Department of Aerospace Engineering, California Polytechnic State University 2 , San Luis Obispo, California 93402, USA

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. 2001
2. Science · 2008 · 321 · 145710.1126/science.1158899 ↗
3. Mater. Sci. Eng. R: Rep. · 2019 · 138 · 10050110.1016/j.mser.2018.09.001 ↗
4. Nat. Mater. · 2021 · 20 · 45410.1038/s41563-020-00852-w ↗
5. MRS Bull. · 2006 · 31 · 22410.1557/mrs2006.49 ↗
6. Nat. Mater. · 2008 · 7 · 10510.1038/nmat2090 ↗
7. Phys. Rev. B · 1993 · 47 · 1272710.1103/physrevb.47.12727 ↗
8. Rowe · 1995
9. Nat. Mater. · 2015 · 14 · 118210.1038/nmat4461 ↗
10. Chem. Mater. · 2010 · 22 · 64810.1021/cm902195j ↗
11. 1957
12. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2015 · 112 · 820510.1073/pnas.1510231112 ↗
13. J. Electron. Mater. · 2017 · 46 · 610.1007/s11664-016-4890-x ↗
14. Energy Environ. Sci. · 2017 · 10 · 228010.1039/c7ee02007d ↗
15. Materials · 2017 · 10 · 30910.3390/ma10030309 ↗
16. J. Electron. Mater. · 2018 · 47 · 308510.1007/s11664-017-5870-5 ↗
17. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2020 · 116 · 19390310.1063/5.0003749 ↗
18. Goupil · 201610.1002/9783527338405 ↗
19. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2003 · 91 · 14830110.1103/physrevlett.91.148301 ↗
20. Rowe · 2006
21. Phys. Rev. · 1950 · 80 · 7210.1103/physrev.80.72 ↗
22. 2006
23. Phys. Rev. · 1959 · 113 · 104610.1103/physrev.113.1046 ↗