Overall performance evaluation using an equivalent circuit model for radio-frequency single-electron transistors
Source abstract
Abstract
Charge sensitivities of a radio-frequency single-electron transistor (RF-SET) by using amplitude (AD) and phase-shift detection (PSD) of the reflected RF signals were experimentally studied. It was found that AD is most sensitive at the resonant frequency while PSD is most sensitive at a frequency slightly off the resonance. The best PSD sensitivity is better than the best AD one when the quality factor of a tank circuit is higher than 10; the higher Q-value is, the superior PSD. The maximal change in reflection amplitude and phase-shift were found proportional to the SET conductance change. The above experimental findings were confirmed by the calculation based on an equivalent circuit model.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Quantum and electron transport phenomena · Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
National Chung Hsing University 1 Department of Physics, , Taichung 402, Taiwan
National Chung Hsing University 2 Center of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, and Institute of Nanoscience, , Taichung 402, Taiwan
Funding
National Science Council Taiwan
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. J. Low Temp. Phys. · 1986 · 62 · 34510.1007/BF00683469 ↗
2. Physical Review Letters · 1987 · 59 · 10910.1103/PhysRevLett.59.109 ↗
3. 1992
4. Journal of Applied Physics · 2006 · 100 · 11432110.1063/1.2388134 ↗
5. Science · 1998 · 280 · 123810.1126/science.280.5367.1238 ↗
6. Applied Physics Letters · 2001 · 79 · 403110.1063/1.1424477 ↗
7. Journal of Applied Physics · 2004 · 96 · 450810.1063/1.1786671 ↗
8. Physical Review B · 2004 · 69 · 14050310.1103/PhysRevB.69.140503 ↗
9. Nature · 2003 · 423 · 42210.1038/nature01642 ↗
10. Nature · 2005 · 434 · 36110.1038/nature03375 ↗
11. Applied Physics Letters · 2004 · 84 · 234310.1063/1.1691491 ↗
12. Nano Letters · 2008 · 8 · 87210.1021/nl0731062 ↗
13. Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 464810.1021/nl801992j ↗
14. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 92 · 11210310.1063/1.2831664 ↗
15. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2007 · 98 · 22700110.1103/PhysRevLett.98.227001 ↗
16. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2006 · 97 · 10660310.1103/PhysRevLett.97.106603 ↗
17. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2004 · 93 · 6680510.1103/PhysRevLett.93.066805 ↗
18. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 87 · 11311210.1063/1.2048813 ↗
19. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2004 · 84 · 446910.1063/1.1755417 ↗
20. New Journal of Physics · 2008 · 10 · 07302510.1088/1367-2630/10/7/073025 ↗
21. See supplementary materials at http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4751251 for the excitation on SET at a high RF power and the RF noise at various input RF power; for the validity of Eq. (7); for detail discussions on the RLC model and the modified model.
22. Physical Review Letters · 1963 · 10 · 48610.1103/PhysRevLett.10.486 ↗
23. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1999 · 74 · 405210.1063/1.123258 ↗
24. Phys. Rev. B · 2004 · 69 · 19531010.1103/PhysRevB.69.195310 ↗
25. Journal of Applied Physics · 2004 · 95 · 127410.1063/1.1635972 ↗
26. Applied Physics Letters · 2006 · 88 · 08350610.1063/1.2179145 ↗
27. Applied Physics Letters · 1968 · 12 · 27710.1063/1.1651991 ↗
28. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2005 · 95 · 20680610.1103/PhysRevLett.95.206806 ↗
29. Physical Review Letters · 2005 · 95 · 20680710.1103/PhysRevLett.95.206807 ↗