journal article·2019-12-01Open access

Investigation of the Dyakonov-Shur instability for THz plasma waves in quantum gated cylindrical FET

Dongao Li, Liping Zhang, Junyan Su

AIP Advances· Volume 9· Issue 12

Abstract

Plasma waves may become unstable in the channel of field effect transistors (FETs) with asymmetric boundary conditions on source and drain, which is known as Dyakonov-Shur instability. In this letter, we extend the Dyakonov-Shur instability to the quantum gated cylindrical FET and obtain the dispersion equations describing unstable terahertz (THz) plasma waves using quantum cylindrical hydrodynamic equations. Research results show that the length of the channel and the wave vector of the circumferential direction inhibit the instability increment; however, the quantum effect, the radius of the channel, and the electron temperature enhance the instability increment. The oscillation frequency increases with the increase in the quantum effect, the wave vector of the circumferential direction, and the electron temperature, but the oscillation frequency increases with the decrease in the length and radius of the channel. Compared with the one-dimensional rectangular FET, THz plasma waves in the two-dimensional cylindrical FET have a higher oscillation frequency.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices · Strong Light-Matter Interactions · Quantum and electron transport phenomena

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Sciences, Lanzhou University of Technology , Lanzhou 730050, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Lanzhou University of Technology

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. Phys. Med. Biol. · 2018 · 63 · 03501610.1088/1361-6560/aa9e1a ↗
2. J. Biomed. Opt. · 2018 · 23 · 02600410.1117/1.jbo.23.2.026004 ↗
3. IEEE Sens. J. · 2018 · 18 · 407310.1109/jsen.2018.2819165 ↗
4. Appl. Opt. · 2018 · 57 · 767310.1364/ao.57.007673 ↗
5. Results Phys. · 2019 · 12 · 73210.1016/j.rinp.2018.12.029 ↗
6. AIP Adv. · 2018 · 8 · 10502910.1063/1.5043469 ↗
7. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1993 · 71 · 246510.1103/physrevlett.71.2465 ↗
8. C. R. Phys. · 2010 · 11 · 41310.1016/j.crhy.2010.05.003 ↗
9. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2004 · 84 · 233110.1063/1.1689401 ↗
10. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 88 · 14190610.1063/1.2191421 ↗
11. Solid-State Electron. · 2008 · 52 · 33810.1016/j.sse.2007.09.002 ↗
12. Phys. Rev. B · 1996 · 54 · 1402010.1103/physrevb.54.14020 ↗
13. Plasma Sci. Technol. · 2018 · 20 · 11500110.1088/2058-6272/aacaef ↗
14. Phys. Plasmas · 2013 · 20 · 08211810.1063/1.4818281 ↗
15. Plasma Sci. Technol. · 2017 · 19 · 04500110.1088/2058-6272/aa4ee2 ↗
16. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 87 · 11150110.1063/1.2042547 ↗
17. Semiconductors · 2008 · 42 · 98410.1134/s1063782608080186 ↗
18. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 97 · 26350410.1063/1.3532850 ↗
19. Superlattices Microstruct. · 2016 · 97 · 17610.1016/j.spmi.2016.06.014 ↗
20. Optik · 2016 · 127 · 829410.1016/j.ijleo.2016.06.031 ↗
21. Plasma Sci. Technol. · 2019 · 21 · 04500210.1088/2058-6272/aaf874 ↗
22. Fields Inst. Commun. · 2005 · 46 · 26310.1090/fic/046/10 ↗
23. Phys. Rev. B · 2001 · 64 · 07531610.1103/physrevb.64.075316 ↗
24. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 99 · 16350410.1063/1.3655200 ↗
25. Phys. Plasmas · 2016 · 23 · 10210410.1063/1.4963847 ↗