Extraction of interface trap density by analyzing organohalide perovskite and metal contacts using device simulation
Source abstract
Abstract
We estimated the interface trap density by examining methylamine-lead-iodide (MALI, CH3NH3PbI3) and metal contacts. We analyzed experimental current-voltage curves from two MALI-based resistive memory devices, which are Au/MALI/indium-tin-oxide and Ag/MALI/Pt, using a device simulator. We obtained effective work functions (EWFs) for MALI/metal contacts by considering Fermi level pinning attributed to the interface states comprising metal-induced gap states (MIGSs) and interface traps. Through our theoretical consideration, we concluded that the interface trap density is about 1015 eV−1 cm−2 at MALI/metal contacts because the low MIGS density of about 1013 eV−1 cm−2 obtained from a theoretical equation makes little contribution to the interface state density of 1015 eV−1 cm−2 obtained from the linear fitting between the metal work functions and the EWFs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Advanced Memory and Neural Computing · Conducting polymers and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Hongik University , Seoul 04066, South Korea
Funding
National Research Foundation of Korea · Hongik University · IC Design Education Center
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Solid-State Electron. · 2014 · 102 · 210.1016/j.sse.2014.06.009 ↗
2. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 12350810.1063/1.3697648 ↗
3. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 08350910.1063/1.3688944 ↗
4. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 42 · 05511210.1088/0022-3727/42/5/055112 ↗
5. ACS Nano · 2010 · 4 · 616210.1021/nn1017582 ↗
6. Proc. IEEE · 2010 · 98 · 223710.1109/jproc.2010.2070830 ↗
7. 2008 · 1
8. Nanotechnology · 2009 · 20 · 21520110.1088/0957-4484/20/21/215201 ↗
9. J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 107 · 07450710.1063/1.3357283 ↗
10. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. · 2016 · 67 · 6510.1146/annurev-physchem-040215-112222 ↗
11. Sci. Rep. · 2012 · 2 · 59110.1038/srep00591 ↗
12. J. Korean Ceram. Soc. · 2018 · 55 · 32510.4191/kcers.2018.55.4.09 ↗
13. J. Mater. Chem. C · 2016 · 4 · 137510.1039/c6tc00141f ↗
14. Vacuum · 2016 · 130 · 10910.1016/j.vacuum.2016.05.010 ↗
15. ACS Nano · 2016 · 10 · 541310.1021/acsnano.6b01643 ↗
16. Adv. Mater. · 2016 · 28 · 656210.1002/adma.201600859 ↗
17. AIP Adv. · 2017 · 7 · 08520710.1063/1.4998432 ↗
18. Rep. Prog. Phys. · 1990 · 53 · 22110.1088/0034-4885/53/3/001 ↗
19. Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2001 · 11 · 37410.1002/1616-3028(200110)11:5<374::aid-adfm374>3.0.co;2-w ↗
20. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2013 · 60 · 328510.1109/ted.2013.2276888 ↗
21. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2000 · 84 · 607810.1103/physrevlett.84.6078 ↗
22. IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2015 · 36 · 88410.1109/led.2015.2453479 ↗
23. J. Appl. Phys. · 2017 · 122 · 19570210.1063/1.5005570 ↗
24. J. Appl. Phys. · 1965 · 36 · 321210.1063/1.1702952 ↗
25. J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 113 · 23450510.1063/1.4811340 ↗
26. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. · 2001 · 120 · 14910.1016/s0368-2048(01)00310-3 ↗
27. J. Mater. Sci. · 2001 · 36 · 496910.1023/a:1011817128242 ↗
28. 2016
29. Nanoscale · 2019 · 11 · 1682810.1039/c9nr02643f ↗