journal article·2019-12-01Open access

Extraction of interface trap density by analyzing organohalide perovskite and metal contacts using device simulation

Hayeon Shim, Yongwoo Kwon

AIP Advances· Volume 9· Issue 12

Abstract

We estimated the interface trap density by examining methylamine-lead-iodide (MALI, CH3NH3PbI3) and metal contacts. We analyzed experimental current-voltage curves from two MALI-based resistive memory devices, which are Au/MALI/indium-tin-oxide and Ag/MALI/Pt, using a device simulator. We obtained effective work functions (EWFs) for MALI/metal contacts by considering Fermi level pinning attributed to the interface states comprising metal-induced gap states (MIGSs) and interface traps. Through our theoretical consideration, we concluded that the interface trap density is about 1015 eV−1 cm−2 at MALI/metal contacts because the low MIGS density of about 1013 eV−1 cm−2 obtained from a theoretical equation makes little contribution to the interface state density of 1015 eV−1 cm−2 obtained from the linear fitting between the metal work functions and the EWFs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Advanced Memory and Neural Computing · Conducting polymers and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Hongik University , Seoul 04066, South Korea

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea · Hongik University · IC Design Education Center

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Solid-State Electron. · 2014 · 102 · 210.1016/j.sse.2014.06.009 ↗
2. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 12350810.1063/1.3697648 ↗
3. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 08350910.1063/1.3688944 ↗
4. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 42 · 05511210.1088/0022-3727/42/5/055112 ↗
5. ACS Nano · 2010 · 4 · 616210.1021/nn1017582 ↗
6. Proc. IEEE · 2010 · 98 · 223710.1109/jproc.2010.2070830 ↗
7. 2008 · 1
8. Nanotechnology · 2009 · 20 · 21520110.1088/0957-4484/20/21/215201 ↗
9. J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 107 · 07450710.1063/1.3357283 ↗
10. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. · 2016 · 67 · 6510.1146/annurev-physchem-040215-112222 ↗
11. Sci. Rep. · 2012 · 2 · 59110.1038/srep00591 ↗
12. J. Korean Ceram. Soc. · 2018 · 55 · 32510.4191/kcers.2018.55.4.09 ↗
13. J. Mater. Chem. C · 2016 · 4 · 137510.1039/c6tc00141f ↗
14. Vacuum · 2016 · 130 · 10910.1016/j.vacuum.2016.05.010 ↗
15. ACS Nano · 2016 · 10 · 541310.1021/acsnano.6b01643 ↗
16. Adv. Mater. · 2016 · 28 · 656210.1002/adma.201600859 ↗
17. AIP Adv. · 2017 · 7 · 08520710.1063/1.4998432 ↗
18. Rep. Prog. Phys. · 1990 · 53 · 22110.1088/0034-4885/53/3/001 ↗
20. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2013 · 60 · 328510.1109/ted.2013.2276888 ↗
21. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2000 · 84 · 607810.1103/physrevlett.84.6078 ↗
22. IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2015 · 36 · 88410.1109/led.2015.2453479 ↗
23. J. Appl. Phys. · 2017 · 122 · 19570210.1063/1.5005570 ↗
24. J. Appl. Phys. · 1965 · 36 · 321210.1063/1.1702952 ↗
25. J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 113 · 23450510.1063/1.4811340 ↗
26. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. · 2001 · 120 · 14910.1016/s0368-2048(01)00310-3 ↗
27. J. Mater. Sci. · 2001 · 36 · 496910.1023/a:1011817128242 ↗
28. 2016
29. Nanoscale · 2019 · 11 · 1682810.1039/c9nr02643f ↗