journal article·2021-05-01Open access

Dynamics of hole injection from p-GaN drain of a hybrid drain embedded GIT

Jinming Sun, Oliver Haeberlen, Clemens Ostermaier, Gerhard Prechtl, Ramakrishna Tadikonda, Eric Persson, Reenu Garg, Mohamed Imam, Sameh Khalil, Alain Charles

AIP Advances· Volume 11· Issue 5

Abstract

The addition of a p-GaN drain to a conventional gate-injection transistor (GIT), forming the so-called hybrid drain embedded GIT, is crucial in the suppression of the dynamic Rdson. The DC leakage due to hole injection is limited to around 10 nA/mm at 600 V (25 °C). However, an injected hole current of several amperes (W = 210 mm) has been observed during the hard switching event. To reconcile this difference over 6 orders of magnitude, a TCAD study is carried out to understand the dynamics of the hole injection and what leads to the difference between the static and the transient current. According to the scenario played out by the present simulation model, the high concentration of carbon, intentionally doped to control the vertical leakage, plays a crucial role in limiting the hole injection current to its DC level, while under fast switching, the hole injection current can be very high due to a lag in response on the part of the carbon trap.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials · Semiconductor materials and devices · Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Infineon Technologies Americas Corp. 1 , El Segundo, California 90245, USA

Infineon Technologies 2 , Siemensstraße, 29500 Villach, Austria

Renesas Electronics America, Inc. 3 , Tempe, Arizona 85264, USA

Microchip Technologies 4 , Chandler, Arizona 85224, USA

ABCs World Consulting 5 , Manhattan Beach, California 90266, USA

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2017 · 64 · 77910.1109/TED.2017.2657579 ↗
2. 2017 · 11
3. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 104 · 26350510.1063/1.4885695 ↗
4. IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2010 · 31 · 95110.1109/led.2010.2052587 ↗
5. IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2012 · 33 · 37510.1109/led.2011.2181815 ↗
6. IEEE Trans. Electron Device · 2005 · 52 · 10610.1109/ted.2004.841338 ↗
7. IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2010 · 31 · 99010.1109/led.2010.2055825 ↗
8. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1996 · 69 · 387210.1063/1.117133 ↗
9. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2007 · 54 · 339310.1109/ted.2007.908601 ↗
10. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2015 · 107 · 16350210.1063/1.4934184 ↗
11. 2015 · 41
12. Microelectron. Reliab. · 2018 · 88-90 · 61010.1016/j.microrel.2018.07.102 ↗
13. 2017 · 227
14. J. Appl. Phys. · 1974 · 45 · 302310.1063/1.1663719 ↗
15. IEEE Trans. Electron Device · 2016 · 63 · 347310.1109/ted.2016.2593791 ↗
16. IEEE Trans. Electron Device · 2012 · 59 · 332710.1109/ted.2012.2216535 ↗
17. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2017 · 110 · 16350610.1063/1.4980140 ↗
18. 2003