Insights into radiation displacement defect in an insulated-gate bipolar transistor
Source abstract
Abstract
The effects of the radiation displacement defect on an insulated-gate bipolar transistor are investigated using the computer-aided design simulation technology. DC characteristics, breakdown voltage, and power dissipation are analyzed according to the position, energy, and types of trap caused by the radiation effect. The on-current is degraded by 100% due to displacement defect, which is generated near the emitter–gate region. An acceptor-like trap with Ec − 0.4 eV shows the most significant degradation compared to an acceptor-like trap with Ec − 0.2 eV and a donor-like trap with Ev + 0.2 eV. At 300 K, the breakdown voltage is unaffected by radiation displacement defects but is significantly reduced in a high-temperature environment (425 K) because the depletion width becomes shorter due to the displacement defect. Power dissipation exhibits immunity to the displacement defect induced by radiation at both room temperature and high temperatures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design · Radiation Effects in Electronics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Division of Electronics Engineering, Jeonbuk National University 1 , Jeonju 54896, Republic of Korea
Future Semiconductor Convergence Technology Research Center and ICT Convergence Research Center, Jeonbuk National University 2 , Jeonju 54896, Republic of Korea
Department of Electrical Engineering, Gyeongsang National University 3 , Jinju 52828, Republic of Korea
Engineering Research Institute (ERI), Gyeongsang National University 4 , Jinju 52828, Republic of Korea
Funding
National Research Foundation of Korea
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. · 2014 · 29 · 215510.1109/tpel.2013.2268900 ↗
2. NPG Asia Mater. · 2018 · 10 · 70310.1038/s41427-018-0062-1 ↗
3. Mater. Today Phys. · 2021 · 16 · 10029010.1016/j.mtphys.2020.100290 ↗
4. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2018 · 10 · 2972410.1021/acsami.8b07030 ↗
5. Microelectron. Reliab. · 1998 · 38 · 131910.1016/s0026-2714(98)00150-4 ↗
6. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. · 2019 · 66 · 154810.1109/tns.2019.2902441 ↗
7. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2020 · 91 · 08330110.1063/5.0010968 ↗
8. Rep. Prog. Phys. · 2007 · 70 · 49310.1088/0034-4885/70/4/r01 ↗
9. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. · 2018 · 65 · 279310.1109/tns.2018.2874191 ↗
10. 2010
11. 2007
12. Microelectron. Reliab. · 2015 · 55 · 151210.1016/j.microrel.2015.06.136 ↗
13. Microelectron. Reliab. · 2013 · 53 · 129310.1016/j.microrel.2013.07.108 ↗
14. IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2018 · 39 · 184010.1109/led.2018.2877882 ↗
15. IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2019 · 40 · 49410.1109/led.2019.2897685 ↗
16. Microelectron. Reliab. · 2016 · 62 · 7410.1016/j.microrel.2016.03.027 ↗
17. 1981
18. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1998 · 81 · 208810.1103/physrevlett.81.2088 ↗
19. Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 72 · 19520610.1103/physrevb.72.195206 ↗
20. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. · 2000 · 3 · 22710.1016/s1369-8001(00)00037-8 ↗
21. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. · 2011 · 58 · 49910.1109/tns.2010.2101615 ↗
22. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2019 · 66 · 188710.1109/ted.2019.2899056 ↗
23. 2015
24. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. · 1992 · 39 · 46810.1109/23.277547 ↗
25. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. · 1995 · 10 · 11110.1109/63.372596 ↗