Amorphous oxide thin-film transistors and inverters enabled by solution-processed multi-layers as active channels
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper reports an indium zinc oxide (IZO) thin film transistor (TFT) with a multi-stacked structure that showed improved performance compared to the TFT with a single active-layer structure. Devices with a multi-stacked active-layer structure were fabricated using an IZO solution process. The determination results showed that the electrical operation and environmental stability of multi-stacked IZO TFTs were improved significantly compared to those of single active-layer IZO TFTs. The roughness of the device surface was measured by atomic force microscopy. The root mean square calculation showed that the multi-stacked active-layer IZO TFT had a smoother surface. The multi-stack structured IZO TFT showed an exceptional electron mobility of 7.75 ± 0.2 cm2/V s, an on–off current ratio of 4.67 × 105 ± 0.55 × 105, and a subthreshold swing of 1.11 V/decade. In addition, a weak threshold voltage (0.35 ± 0.42 V) that is more conducive to device driving was obtained. These results highlight the great potential of multi-stack structured IZO TFTs for applications in active-matrix backplane displays.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Thin-Film Transistor Technologies · ZnO doping and properties · Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Chungbuk National University 1 , Cheongju 28644, South Korea
College of Information Engineering, Yangzhou University 2 , Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225009, China
Funding
National Research Foundation of Korea · Institute for Information and Communications Technology Promotion
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2012 · 4 · 400110.1021/am3008278 ↗
2. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2016 · 8 · 786210.1021/acsami.5b10778 ↗
3. Chem. Mater. · 2016 · 28 · 830510.1021/acs.chemmater.6b03499 ↗
4. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 105 · 11350910.1063/1.4895782 ↗
5. Sci. Adv. · 2017 · 3 · e160264010.1126/sciadv.1602640 ↗
6. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2014 · 6 · 1533510.1021/am5037934 ↗
7. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2014 · 6 · 337110.1021/am4054139 ↗
8. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2016 · 63 · 432010.1109/ted.2016.2612630 ↗
9. Ceram. Int. · 2015 · 41 · S33710.1016/j.ceramint.2015.03.120 ↗
10. J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B · 2017 · 35 · 04E10310.1116/1.4994803 ↗
11. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2018 · 65 · 101810.1109/ted.2018.2797300 ↗
12. J. Alloys Compd. · 2010 · 507 · L110.1016/j.jallcom.2010.06.166 ↗
13. J. Inf. Disp. · 2016 · 17 · 9310.1080/15980316.2016.1200501 ↗
14. Thin Solid Films · 2017 · 641 · 1910.1016/j.tsf.2017.05.024 ↗
15. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2018 · 65 · 52010.1109/ted.2017.2779743 ↗
16. IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2018 · 39 · 70310.1109/led.2018.2822180 ↗
17. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2000 · 47 · 40410.1109/16.822287 ↗
18. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2007 · 54 · 297510.1109/ted.2007.906968 ↗
19. IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2019 · 40 · 89710.1109/led.2019.2909282 ↗