Design of SiO2/4H–SiC MOS interfaces by sputter deposition of SiO2 followed by high-temperature CO2-post deposition annealing
Source abstract
Abstract
Oxidation of silicon carbide (SiC) is known to induce defects at the interface of the SiO2/SiC system. NO-annealing is a standard industrial method of nitridation, but oxidation may progress during NO-nitridation, which may generate interface defects. Here, we propose a new method of fabricating SiO2/SiC metal-oxide-semiconductor (MOS) devices: sputter deposition of SiO2 in an Ar/N2 gas mixture followed by high-temperature CO2-post deposition annealing to form SiO2 and incorporate nitrogen at the interface while suppressing oxidation of the SiC. We obtained the nitrogen depth profile by performing x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and confirmed that most of the nitrogen atoms exist at the abrupt interface. While maintaining a low interface state density and good insulating property, we demonstrated much improved reliability of MOS devices compared to conventional NO-annealed samples, thanks to the well-designed SiO2/SiC interface by the proposed method.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies · Semiconductor materials and devices · Copper Interconnects and Reliability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University , Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
Funding
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology · Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Microelectron. Eng. · 2006 · 83 · 44010.1016/j.mee.2005.11.007 ↗
2. IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2012 · 34 · 11710.1109/led.2012.2228161 ↗
3. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2000 · 77 · 328110.1063/1.1326046 ↗
4. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2008 · 55 · 204610.1109/ted.2008.926674 ↗
5. Mater. Sci. Forum · 2020 · 1004 · 62010.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.1004.620 ↗
6. Appl. Phys. Express · 2020 · 13 · 12010110.35848/1882-0786/abc787 ↗
7. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 99 · 02190710.1063/1.3610487 ↗
8. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 40 · 624210.1088/0022-3727/40/20/s09 ↗
9. J. Appl. Phys. · 2019 · 126 · 14530210.1063/1.5100754 ↗
10. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2021 · 118 · 03160110.1063/5.0037241 ↗
11. Appl. Phys. Express · 2020 · 13 · 09100310.35848/1882-0786/ababed ↗
12. Appl. Phys. Express · 2020 · 13 · 12100210.35848/1882-0786/abc6ed ↗
13. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1997 · 70 · 202810.1063/1.118773 ↗
14. IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2001 · 22 · 17610.1109/55.915604 ↗
15. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2013 · 60 · 126010.1109/ted.2012.2236333 ↗
16. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2003 · 50 · 158210.1109/ted.2003.814974 ↗
17. Appl. Phys. Express · 2017 · 10 · 04660110.7567/apex.10.046601 ↗
18. J. Appl. Phys. · 2003 · 93 · 225710.1063/1.1539541 ↗
19. Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2014 · 317 · 59310.1016/j.apsusc.2014.08.181 ↗
20. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2022 · 61 · SC106510.35848/1347-4065/ac4685 ↗
21. AIP Adv. · 2015 · 5 · 09713410.1063/1.4930980 ↗
22. Appl. Phys. Express · 2021 · 14 · 10100110.35848/1882-0786/ac23e8 ↗
23. Appl. Phys. Express · 2023 · 16 · 07400410.35848/1882-0786/ace7ac ↗
24. Appl. Phys. Express · 2018 · 11 · 10130310.7567/apex.11.101303 ↗
25. Appl. Phys. Express · 2022 · 15 · 04100210.35848/1882-0786/ac5ace ↗
26. Appl. Phys. Express · 2022 · 15 · 06100310.35848/1882-0786/ac6f42 ↗
27. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2016 · 108 · 20160710.1063/1.4951677 ↗