journal article·2023-11-01Open access

Design of SiO2/4H–SiC MOS interfaces by sputter deposition of SiO2 followed by high-temperature CO2-post deposition annealing

Tae-Hyeon Kil, Takuma Kobayashi, Takayoshi Shimura, Heiji Watanabe

AIP Advances· Volume 13· Issue 11

Abstract

Oxidation of silicon carbide (SiC) is known to induce defects at the interface of the SiO2/SiC system. NO-annealing is a standard industrial method of nitridation, but oxidation may progress during NO-nitridation, which may generate interface defects. Here, we propose a new method of fabricating SiO2/SiC metal-oxide-semiconductor (MOS) devices: sputter deposition of SiO2 in an Ar/N2 gas mixture followed by high-temperature CO2-post deposition annealing to form SiO2 and incorporate nitrogen at the interface while suppressing oxidation of the SiC. We obtained the nitrogen depth profile by performing x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and confirmed that most of the nitrogen atoms exist at the abrupt interface. While maintaining a low interface state density and good insulating property, we demonstrated much improved reliability of MOS devices compared to conventional NO-annealed samples, thanks to the well-designed SiO2/SiC interface by the proposed method.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies · Semiconductor materials and devices · Copper Interconnects and Reliability

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University , Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan

Funding

Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology · Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. Microelectron. Eng. · 2006 · 83 · 44010.1016/j.mee.2005.11.007 ↗
2. IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2012 · 34 · 11710.1109/led.2012.2228161 ↗
3. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2000 · 77 · 328110.1063/1.1326046 ↗
4. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2008 · 55 · 204610.1109/ted.2008.926674 ↗
5. Mater. Sci. Forum · 2020 · 1004 · 62010.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.1004.620 ↗
6. Appl. Phys. Express · 2020 · 13 · 12010110.35848/1882-0786/abc787 ↗
7. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 99 · 02190710.1063/1.3610487 ↗
8. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 40 · 624210.1088/0022-3727/40/20/s09 ↗
9. J. Appl. Phys. · 2019 · 126 · 14530210.1063/1.5100754 ↗
10. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2021 · 118 · 03160110.1063/5.0037241 ↗
11. Appl. Phys. Express · 2020 · 13 · 09100310.35848/1882-0786/ababed ↗
12. Appl. Phys. Express · 2020 · 13 · 12100210.35848/1882-0786/abc6ed ↗
13. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1997 · 70 · 202810.1063/1.118773 ↗
14. IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2001 · 22 · 17610.1109/55.915604 ↗
15. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2013 · 60 · 126010.1109/ted.2012.2236333 ↗
16. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2003 · 50 · 158210.1109/ted.2003.814974 ↗
17. Appl. Phys. Express · 2017 · 10 · 04660110.7567/apex.10.046601 ↗
18. J. Appl. Phys. · 2003 · 93 · 225710.1063/1.1539541 ↗
19. Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2014 · 317 · 59310.1016/j.apsusc.2014.08.181 ↗
20. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2022 · 61 · SC106510.35848/1347-4065/ac4685 ↗
21. AIP Adv. · 2015 · 5 · 09713410.1063/1.4930980 ↗
22. Appl. Phys. Express · 2021 · 14 · 10100110.35848/1882-0786/ac23e8 ↗
23. Appl. Phys. Express · 2023 · 16 · 07400410.35848/1882-0786/ace7ac ↗
24. Appl. Phys. Express · 2018 · 11 · 10130310.7567/apex.11.101303 ↗
25. Appl. Phys. Express · 2022 · 15 · 04100210.35848/1882-0786/ac5ace ↗
26. Appl. Phys. Express · 2022 · 15 · 06100310.35848/1882-0786/ac6f42 ↗
27. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2016 · 108 · 20160710.1063/1.4951677 ↗