Ultrafast inverse design of quantum dot optical spectra via a joint TD-DFT learning scheme and deep reinforcement learning
Source abstract
Abstract
Here, we report a case study on inverse design of quantum dot optical spectra using a deep reinforcement learning algorithm for the desired target optical property of semiconductor CdxSeyTex−y quantum dots. Machine learning models were trained to predict the optical absorption and emission spectra by using the training dataset by time dependent density functional theory simulation. We show that the trained deep deterministic policy gradient inverse design agent can infer the molecular structure with an accuracy of less than 1 Å at a fixed computational time of milliseconds and up to 100–1000 times faster than the conventional heuristic particle swam optimization method. Most of the effective inverse design problems based on the surrogate machine learning and reinforcement learning model have been focused on the field of nano-photonics. Few attempts have been made in the field of quantum optical system in a similar manner. For the first time, our results, to our knowledge, provide concrete evidence that for computationally challenging tasks, a well-trained deep reinforcement learning agent can replace the existing quantum simulation and heuristics optimization tool, enabling fast and scalable simulations of the optical property of nanometer sized semiconductor quantum dots.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Machine Learning in Materials Science · Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Engineering Department, The University of Electro-Communications 1 , Tokyo, Japan
i-Powered Energy System Research Center, The University of Electro-Communications 2 , Tokyo, Japan
Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology (RCAST), The University of Tokyo 3 , Tokyo, Japan
Funding
New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Science · 2000 · 290 · 31410.1126/science.290.5490.314 ↗
2. Nat. Photonics · 2012 · 6 · 13310.1038/nphoton.2012.33 ↗
3. Sci. Rep. · 2015 · 4 · 479210.1038/srep04792 ↗
4. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 105 · 11390410.1063/1.4896114 ↗
5. Science · 2005 · 307 · 53810.1126/science.1104274 ↗
6. Adv. Energy Mater. · 2022 · 12 · 220167610.1002/aenm.202201676 ↗
7. Eur. Phys. J. B · 2019 · 92 · 28010.1140/epjb/e2019-100406-y ↗
8. J. Phys. Chem. C · 2019 · 123 · 3071410.1021/acs.jpcc.9b09152 ↗
9. J. Chem. Theory Comput. · 2014 · 10 · 7610.1021/ct400513s ↗
10. Nano Lett. · 2018 · 18 · 657010.1021/acs.nanolett.8b03171 ↗
11. J. Phys. Mater. · 2019 · 2 · 03200110.1088/2515-7639/ab084b ↗
12. APL Mater. · 2016 · 4 · 05320810.1063/1.4946894 ↗
13. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2012 · 108 · 05830110.1103/physrevlett.108.058301 ↗
14. New J. Phys. · 2013 · 15 · 09500310.1088/1367-2630/15/9/095003 ↗
15. Nat. Photonics · 2018 · 12 · 65910.1038/s41566-018-0246-9 ↗
16. Laser Photonics Rev. · 2011 · 5 · 30810.1002/lpor.201000014 ↗
17. Photonics Res. · 2021 · 9 · B18210.1364/prj.415960 ↗
18. Nat. Mater. · 2021 · 20 · 166310.1038/s41563-021-01094-0 ↗
19. ACS Photonics · 2018 · 5 · 136510.1021/acsphotonics.7b01377 ↗
20. Mach. Learn. Sci. Technol. · 2021 · 2 · 02501310.1088/2632-2153/abc327 ↗
21. ACS Cent. Sci. · 2019 · 5 · 31910.1021/acscentsci.8b00802 ↗
22. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2021 · 119 · 06110110.1063/5.0055733 ↗
23. Sci. Adv. · 2018 · 4 · eaar420610.1126/sciadv.aar4206 ↗
24. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2019 · 114 · 18110510.1063/1.5094838 ↗
25. Adv. Sci. · 2021 · 8 · 200292310.1002/advs.202002923 ↗
26. Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. · 2020 · 1 · 10025910.1016/j.xcrp.2020.100259 ↗
27. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2022 · 121 · 07170110.1063/5.0096869 ↗
28. Chem. Rev. · 2019 · 119 · 659510.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00759 ↗
29. 2016
30. Chem. Phys. Lett. · 2004 · 393 · 5110.1016/j.cplett.2004.06.011 ↗
31. 1990 · 255
32. Discuss. Faraday Soc. · 1950 · 9 · 1410.1039/df9500900014 ↗
33. J. Chem. Phys. · 1997 · 107 · 303210.1063/1.474659 ↗
34. T. Sogabe, https://github.com/KShiba24/INVERSE-DESIGN-DDPG, 2022.
35. 2014
36. Mach. Learn. Res. · 2011 · 12 · 2825
37. G. Brockman, V. Cheung, L. Pettersson, J. Schneider, J. Schulman, J. Tang, and W. Zaremba, arXiv:1606.01540 (2016).
38. Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning
39. 2018 · 3794
40. J. Renewable Sustainable Energy · 2022 · 14 · 04550110.1063/5.0097344 ↗
41. 1995 · 1942
42. Nature · 2017 · 550 · 35410.1038/nature24270 ↗