Accuracy balancing for the simulation of gate-all-around junctionless nanowire transistors using discrete Wigner transport equation
Source abstract
Abstract
We report the application of the discrete Wigner transport equation to the simulation of gate-all-around junctionless nanowire transistors (JLNWTs). We show that unphysical simulation results are obtained unless we pay attention to the accuracy balancing problem. An empirical criterion based on the subthreshold swing of the JLNWT is proposed for the accuracy balancing. Using this criterion, we investigate the characteristics of JLNWTs with the quantum effect fully considered.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design · Quantum and electron transport phenomena · Semiconductor materials and devices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electrical Engineering, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Korea
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, USA
Department of Information and Communications Engineering, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Gyeonggi-Do 17035, Korea
Funding
Hankuk University of Foreign Studies · National Research Foundation of Korea
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1103/revmodphys.62.74510.1103/revmodphys.62.745 ↗
2. 10.1088/0034-4885/67/7/r0110.1088/0034-4885/67/7/r01 ↗
3. 10.1103/physrevb.42.942910.1103/physrevb.42.9429 ↗
4. 10.1063/1.322685610.1063/1.3226856 ↗
5. 10.1109/ted.2009.202135710.1109/ted.2009.2021357 ↗
6. 10.1137/072700310.1137/0727003 ↗
7. 10.1137/s003614299223882x10.1137/s003614299223882x ↗
8. J. Cervenka, P. Ellinghaus, and M. Nedjalkov, inNumerical Methods and Applications, edited by I. Dimov, S. Fidanova, and I. Lirkov (Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 2015), pp. 149–156.10.1007/978-3-319-15585-2_17 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jcp.2014.12.02610.1016/j.jcp.2014.12.026 ↗
10. 10.1109/ted.2003.80943410.1109/ted.2003.809434 ↗
11. 10.1103/physrevb.70.11531910.1103/physrevb.70.115319 ↗
12. 10.1007/s10825-009-0281-310.1007/s10825-009-0281-3 ↗
13. 10.1515/mcma-2013-001810.1515/mcma-2013-0018 ↗
14. 10.1007/s10825-014-0635-310.1007/s10825-014-0635-3 ↗
15. 10.1007/s10825-015-0730-010.1007/s10825-015-0730-0 ↗
16. 10.1063/1.34555110.1063/1.345551 ↗
17. 10.1016/s0038-1101(99)00168-910.1016/s0038-1101(99)00168-9 ↗
18. 10.1007/s10825-016-0944-910.1007/s10825-016-0944-9 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.281836310.1063/1.2818363 ↗
20. 10.1007/s10825-013-0510-710.1007/s10825-013-0510-7 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.sse.2015.04.00710.1016/j.sse.2015.04.007 ↗
22. 10.1063/1.347801210.1063/1.3478012 ↗
23. 10.1109/ted.2009.202135510.1109/ted.2009.2021355 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.495423710.1063/1.4954237 ↗
25. Savio A. · Int. J. Adv. Syst. Meas. · 2010 · 3 · 99
26. 10.1063/1.352696910.1063/1.3526969 ↗
27. 10.1088/1361-6633/aa56f010.1088/1361-6633/aa56f0 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.307941110.1063/1.3079411 ↗
29. 10.1109/ted.2009.203909310.1109/ted.2009.2039093 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.sse.2011.06.00410.1016/j.sse.2011.06.004 ↗