Temperature-dependent characteristics for the p-type CuO gate HEMT and high-k HfO2 MIS-HEMT on the Si substrates
Source abstract
Abstract
This work presents the temperature-dependent characteristics of the thin-barrier Al0.45Ga0.55N/GaN high electron mobility transistor (HEMT), p-type CuO gate HEMT, and high-k HfO2 metal–insulator–semiconductor HEMT (MIS-HEMT). As the temperature rises from 20 to 300 °C, the maximum trans-conductance of the HfO2 MIS-HEMT and CuO gate HEMT reduces by 56.9% and 43.2%, respectively. The sub-threshold swing of the CuO gate HEMT is smaller than that of the HfO2 device when the temperature reaches 300 °C. According to the C–V test results from 20 to 300 °C, the relative dielectric constant of CuO increases from 18.1 to 47.4, whereas HfO2 has a relatively stable dielectric constant. The calculation models are presented to investigate the effect of the dielectric constant on the drain current and the trans-conductance. The calculated results show that the maximum transconductance of the HfO2 MIS-HEMT and CuO gate HEMT decreases by 52.3% and 38.9%, respectively, which is in good agreement with the experimental results.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials · ZnO doping and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Key Lab of Wide Band Gap Semiconductor Materials and Devices 1 , Xi’an 710071, China
School of Microelectronics, Xidian University 2 , Xi’an 710071, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · China Postdoctoral Science Foundation
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2019 · 115 · 15350310.1063/1.5115013 ↗
2. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2019 · 115 · 10350210.1063/1.5108832 ↗
3. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2018 · 113 · 24210210.1063/1.5064407 ↗
4. IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2020 · 41 · 82810.1109/led.2020.2988074 ↗
5. IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2020 · 41 · 68910.1109/led.2020.2984727 ↗
6. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2019 · 115 · 19350510.1063/1.5123192 ↗
7. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2020 · 67 · 480810.1109/ted.2020.3020293 ↗
8. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2020 · 67 · 276010.1109/ted.2020.2992014 ↗
9. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2017 · 64 · 313910.1109/ted.2017.2712782 ↗
10. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 89 · 21290510.1063/1.2393001 ↗
11. IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2020 · 41 · 13510.1109/led.2019.2957376 ↗
12. IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2021 · 42 · 21210.1109/led.2021.3049245 ↗
13. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2020 · 117 · 14350610.1063/5.0025351 ↗
14. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2020 · 67 · 21710.1109/ted.2019.2954282 ↗
15. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2021 · 68 · 267310.1109/ted.2021.3075425 ↗
16. J. Appl. Phys. · 2018 · 123 · 03450410.1063/1.5017668 ↗
17. IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2015 · 36 · 31810.1109/led.2015.2403954 ↗
18. IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2010 · 31 · 18910.1109/led.2009.2039026 ↗
19. J. Mater. Sci. · 2020 · 55 · 249210.1007/s10853-019-04129-9 ↗
20. Solid-State Electron. · 2020 · 163 · 10764910.1016/j.sse.2019.107649 ↗
21. Semicond. Sci. Technol. · 2019 · 34 · 02500410.1088/1361-6641/aaf518 ↗
22. Superlattices Microstruct. · 2013 · 60 · 4710.1016/j.spmi.2013.04.015 ↗
23. J. Mater. Sci. · 2018 · 53 · 814110.1007/s10853-018-2160-4 ↗
24. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1998 · 73 · 63210.1063/1.121930 ↗