journal article·2021-10-01Open access

Temperature-dependent characteristics for the p-type CuO gate HEMT and high-k HfO2 MIS-HEMT on the Si substrates

Yaopeng Zhao, Chong Wang, Xuefeng Zheng, Yunlong He, Xiaohua Ma, Kai Liu, Ang Li, Yue Hao

AIP Advances· Volume 11· Issue 10

Abstract

This work presents the temperature-dependent characteristics of the thin-barrier Al0.45Ga0.55N/GaN high electron mobility transistor (HEMT), p-type CuO gate HEMT, and high-k HfO2 metal–insulator–semiconductor HEMT (MIS-HEMT). As the temperature rises from 20 to 300 °C, the maximum trans-conductance of the HfO2 MIS-HEMT and CuO gate HEMT reduces by 56.9% and 43.2%, respectively. The sub-threshold swing of the CuO gate HEMT is smaller than that of the HfO2 device when the temperature reaches 300 °C. According to the C–V test results from 20 to 300 °C, the relative dielectric constant of CuO increases from 18.1 to 47.4, whereas HfO2 has a relatively stable dielectric constant. The calculation models are presented to investigate the effect of the dielectric constant on the drain current and the trans-conductance. The calculated results show that the maximum transconductance of the HfO2 MIS-HEMT and CuO gate HEMT decreases by 52.3% and 38.9%, respectively, which is in good agreement with the experimental results.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials · ZnO doping and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Key Lab of Wide Band Gap Semiconductor Materials and Devices 1 , Xi’an 710071, China

School of Microelectronics, Xidian University 2 , Xi’an 710071, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · China Postdoctoral Science Foundation

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2019 · 115 · 15350310.1063/1.5115013 ↗
2. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2019 · 115 · 10350210.1063/1.5108832 ↗
3. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2018 · 113 · 24210210.1063/1.5064407 ↗
4. IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2020 · 41 · 82810.1109/led.2020.2988074 ↗
5. IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2020 · 41 · 68910.1109/led.2020.2984727 ↗
6. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2019 · 115 · 19350510.1063/1.5123192 ↗
7. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2020 · 67 · 480810.1109/ted.2020.3020293 ↗
8. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2020 · 67 · 276010.1109/ted.2020.2992014 ↗
9. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2017 · 64 · 313910.1109/ted.2017.2712782 ↗
10. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 89 · 21290510.1063/1.2393001 ↗
11. IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2020 · 41 · 13510.1109/led.2019.2957376 ↗
12. IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2021 · 42 · 21210.1109/led.2021.3049245 ↗
13. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2020 · 117 · 14350610.1063/5.0025351 ↗
14. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2020 · 67 · 21710.1109/ted.2019.2954282 ↗
15. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2021 · 68 · 267310.1109/ted.2021.3075425 ↗
16. J. Appl. Phys. · 2018 · 123 · 03450410.1063/1.5017668 ↗
17. IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2015 · 36 · 31810.1109/led.2015.2403954 ↗
18. IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2010 · 31 · 18910.1109/led.2009.2039026 ↗
19. J. Mater. Sci. · 2020 · 55 · 249210.1007/s10853-019-04129-9 ↗
20. Solid-State Electron. · 2020 · 163 · 10764910.1016/j.sse.2019.107649 ↗
21. Semicond. Sci. Technol. · 2019 · 34 · 02500410.1088/1361-6641/aaf518 ↗
22. Superlattices Microstruct. · 2013 · 60 · 4710.1016/j.spmi.2013.04.015 ↗
23. J. Mater. Sci. · 2018 · 53 · 814110.1007/s10853-018-2160-4 ↗
24. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1998 · 73 · 63210.1063/1.121930 ↗