Theoretical insights into kesterite and stannite phases of Cu2(Sn1–XGeX)ZnSe4 based alloys: A prospective photovoltaic material
Source abstract
Abstract
A comparative study of kesterite (KS) and stannite (ST) phases of Cu2(Sn1−xGex)ZnSe4 (CTGZSe) alloys has been carried out using a hybrid functional within the framework of density functional theory (DFT). Our calculations suggest that KS phase is energetically more stable. We find that the total energy of the KS phase decreases with increasing concentration (x) of Ge. The calculated positive binding energies suggest that the alloy systems are stable. The formation enthalpy clearly indicates that CTGZSe alloys are thermodynamically stable and its growth can be achieved by following the route of an exothermic reaction. The calculated energy band gaps of the alloys agree well with the experimental data for the KS phase. The band offsets of KS and ST phases as a function of Ge concentration (x) can be explained on the basis of the calculated energy band gaps. We find a slight upshift in the conduction band edges while the valence band edges remain almost the same on varying the concentration (x) of Ge. Our results could be useful for the development of CTGZSe alloys based solar cells.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Semiconductor materials and interfaces
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
M. J. P. Rohilkhand University 1 Applied Physics Department, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, , Bareilly 243 006, India
Department of Science and Technology 2 , New Delhi 110 016, India
CSIR-National Physical Laboratory 3 , Dr. K. S. Krishnan Marg, New Delhi 110 012, India
Funding
Science and Engineering Research Board
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Prog. Photovolt. : Res. App. · 2011 · 19 · 89410.1002/pip.1078 ↗
2. Chem. Mater. · 2011 · 23 · 262610.1021/cm2002836 ↗
3. Chem. Mater. · 2012 · 24 · 458810.1021/cm302881g ↗
4. Adv. Energy Mater. · 2014 · 4 · 130146510.1002/aenm.201301465 ↗
5. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 94 · 04190310.1063/1.3074499 ↗
6. Phys. Rev. Appl. · 2015 · 4 · 05400610.1103/PhysRevApplied.4.054006 ↗
7. Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 82 · 19520310.1103/PhysRevB.82.195203 ↗
8. RSC Adv. · 2013 · 3 · 118610.1039/C2RA22503D ↗
9. Phys. Rev. B · 2013 · 87 · 11520810.1103/PhysRevB.87.115208 ↗
10. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 53 · 04ER0910.7567/JJAP.53.04ER09 ↗
11. Phys. Rev. B · 1994 · 50 · 1795310.1103/physrevb.50.17953 ↗
12. Phys. Rev. B · 1996 · 54 · 1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
13. Comput. Mater. Sci. · 1996 · 6 · 1510.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
14. Phys. Rev. B · 1976 · 13 · 518810.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 ↗
15. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1980 · 45 · 56610.1103/PhysRevLett.45.566 ↗
16. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1996 · 77 · 386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
17. J. Chem. Phys. · 2003 · 118 · 820710.1063/1.1564060 ↗
18. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2014 · 16 · 2229910.1039/C4CP02870H ↗
19. J. Phys. Condens. Matter · 2007 · 19 · 25620110.1088/0953-8984/19/25/256201 ↗
20. RSC Adv. · 2016 · 6 · 9908810.1039/C6RA17693C ↗
21. Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 79 · 15510110.1103/PhysRevB.79.155101 ↗
22. Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 72 · 08510810.1103/PhysRevB.72.085108 ↗
23. 2003 · 45
24. J. Appl. Phys. · 1995 · 78 · 384610.1063/1.359901 ↗
25. J. Phys. C : Solid State Phy. · 1979 · 12 · 73110.1088/0022-3719/12/4/018 ↗
26. Phys. Rev. B · 1985 · 32 · 696810.1103/PhysRevB.32.6968 ↗
27. Phys. Rev. B · 1987 · 35 · 618210.1103/PhysRevB.35.6182 ↗
28. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 97 · 03211610.1063/1.3464562 ↗