journal article·2017-02-01Open access

Transient thermal analysis of semiconductor diode lasers under pulsed operation

G. K. Veerabathran, S. Sprengel, S. Karl, A. Andrejew, H. Schmeiduch, M.-C. Amann

AIP Advances· Volume 7· Issue 2

Abstract

Self-heating in semiconductor lasers is often assumed negligible during pulsed operation, provided the pulses are ‘short’. However, there is no consensus on the upper limit of pulse width for a given device to avoid-self heating. In this paper, we present an experimental and theoretical analysis of the effect of pulse width on laser characteristics. First, a measurement method is introduced to study thermal transients of edge-emitting lasers during pulsed operation. This method can also be applied to lasers that do not operate in continuous-wave mode. Secondly, an analytical thermal model is presented which is used to fit the experimental data to extract important parameters for thermal analysis. Although commercial numerical tools are available for such transient analyses, this model is more suitable for parameter extraction due to its analytical nature. Thirdly, to validate this approach, it was used to study a GaSb-based inter-band laser and an InP-based quantum cascade laser (QCL). The maximum pulse-width for less than 5% error in the measured threshold currents was determined to be 200 and 25 ns for the GaSb-based laser and QCL, respectively.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Spectroscopy and Laser Applications · Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices · Laser Design and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Technische Universität München Walter Schottky Institut, , Am Coulombwall 4, 85748 Garching, Germany

Funding

German excellence cluster"Nano-initiative Munich"

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. IEEE J. Quantum Electron · 1968 · 4 · 11910.1109/jqe.1968.1075062 ↗
2. Opt. Mater. Express · 2013 · 3 · 162410.1364/ome.3.001624 ↗
3. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2015 · 106 · 25110210.1063/1.4922995 ↗
4. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2004 · 84 · 369010.1063/1.1739518 ↗
5. Solid State Electron · 1965 · 8 · 58510.1016/0038-1101(65)90085-7 ↗
6. IEEE J. Quantum Electron · 2006 · 42 · 859
7. IEEE Trans. Compon. Packag. Manuf. Technol. · 2011 · 1 · 197510.1109/tcpmt.2011.2142309 ↗
8. J. Appl. Phys. · 1975 · 46 · 85510.1063/1.321657 ↗
9. Las. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 2 · 52510.1002/lapl.200510063 ↗
10. J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 108 · 08450410.1063/1.3493117 ↗
11. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1995 · 67 · 305710.1063/1.114005 ↗
12. J. Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 103 · 08311310.1063/1.2907862 ↗
13. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 87 · 09350610.1063/1.2037201 ↗
14. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 1992 · 63 · 200410.1063/1.1143318 ↗
15. J. Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 101 · 04450710.1063/1.2432478 ↗
16. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 1981 · 20 · L39510.1143/jjap.20.l395 ↗
17. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 98 · 18111010.1063/1.3587810 ↗
18. Proc. SPIE · 2012 · 8277 · 82771B10.1117/12.905930 ↗
19. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 94 · 15110610.1063/1.3119184 ↗
20. 1990
21. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1987 · 50 · 410.1063/1.97963 ↗
22. Levinshtein · 1996
23. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. · 2000 · 12 · 145010.1109/68.887653 ↗
24. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2003 · 83 · 250310.1063/1.1613354 ↗
25. J. Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 102 · 06350210.1063/1.2779259 ↗
26. J. Appl. Phys. · 2006 · 100 · 04310910.1063/1.2222074 ↗
27. J. Phys.: Condensed Matter · 1992 · 4 · 620910.1088/0953-8984/4/29/005 ↗
28. Gray · 1972
29. IEEE J. Quantum Electron · 1988 · 24 · 63510.1109/3.172 ↗
30. 1968