journal article·2022-04-01Open access

Fringing field induced current coupling in concentric metal–insulator–semiconductor (MIS) tunnel diodes with ultra-thin oxide

Jen-Hao Chen, Kung-Chu Chen, Jenn-Gwo Hwu

AIP Advances· Volume 12· Issue 4

Abstract

Coupling phenomenon between two Al/SiO2/Si(p) metal–insulator–semiconductor (MIS) tunneling diodes (TD) with various thin oxide thicknesses was studied in detail. When the bias voltage at one MIS TD is positive enough, the saturation currents of the two neighboring MIS TDs with concentric gate structures would be approximately the same due to saturation current coupling effect though the areas of these two devices are different. With thinner oxide, the saturation current coupling effect occurs earlier. This result indicates an enhancement of coupling sensitivity between two neighboring MIS TDs with thinner oxide. A physical mechanism of lateral minority carrier flow attracted by the fringing field was given to explain this phenomenon. Moreover, this oxide thickness dependent phenomenon of coupling effect was confirmed by capacitance–voltage (C–V) characteristics, and the fringing field extension and strengthening were clarified by 2D TCAD simulation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design · Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Graduate Institute of Electronics Engineering/Department of Electrical Engineering, National Taiwan University , Taipei, Taiwan 10617, Republic of China

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Solid-State Electron. · 1974 · 17 · 55110.1016/0038-1101(74)90172-5 ↗
2. Solid-State Electron. · 1974 · 17 · 56310.1016/0038-1101(74)90173-7 ↗
3. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. · 2014 · 3 · Q13210.1149/2.019406jss ↗
4. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2005 · 38 · A7310.1088/0022-3727/38/10a/014 ↗
5. IEEE Sens. J. · 2017 · 17 · 659910.1109/jsen.2017.2732499 ↗
6. IEEE Sens. J. · 2012 · 12 · 29810.1109/jsen.2010.2100039 ↗
7. J. Appl. Phys. · 2019 · 125 · 03310210.1063/1.5065507 ↗
8. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2014 · 61 · 321710.1109/ted.2014.2334704 ↗
9. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2014 · 61 · 356210.1109/ted.2014.2346238 ↗
10. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2015 · 62 · 206110.1109/ted.2015.2424245 ↗
11. J. Appl. Phys. · 2017 · 121 · 15450410.1063/1.4981891 ↗
12. AIP Adv. · 2020 · 10 · 10500210.1063/5.0022326 ↗
13. J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 115 · 12410910.1063/1.4870186 ↗
14. IEEE Sens. J. · 2012 · 12 · 146810.1109/jsen.2011.2173484 ↗
15. Solid-State Electron. · 2002 · 46 · 37310.1016/s0038-1101(01)00111-3 ↗
16. IEEE Trans. Compon., Hybrids, Manuf. Technol. · 1982 · 5 · 12710.1109/tchmt.1982.1135931 ↗
17. J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1990 · 137 · 188710.1149/1.2086825 ↗
18. J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1979 · 126 · 8910.1149/1.2128996 ↗
19. Mol. Struct. · 1999 · 480–481 · 60710.1016/s0022-2860(99)00017-4 ↗
20. ECS Trans. · 2016 · 75 · 7710.1149/07505.0077ecst ↗
21. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2016 · 63 · 286410.1109/ted.2016.2565688 ↗
22. J. Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 106 · 07450710.1063/1.3226853 ↗
23. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2022 · 69 · 197210.1109/ted.2022.3147747 ↗