journal article·2017-08-01Open access

High performance MoS2 TFT using graphene contact first process

Chih-Shiang Chang Chien, Hsun-Ming Chang, Wei-Ta Lee, Ming-Ru Tang, Chao-Hsin Wu, Si-Chen Lee

AIP Advances· Volume 7· Issue 8

Abstract

An ohmic contact of graphene/MoS2 heterostructure is determined by using ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS). Since graphene shows a great potential to replace metal contact, a direct comparison of Cr/Au contact and graphene contact on the MoS2 thin film transistor (TFT) is made. Different from metal contacts, the work function of graphene can be modulated. As a result, the subthreshold swing can be improved. And when Vg<VFB, the intrinsic graphene changes into p-type, so graphene contact can achieve lower off current by lowering the Fermi level. To further improve the performance of MoS2 TFT, a new method using graphene contact first and MoS2 layer last process that can avoid PMMA residue and high processing temperature is applied. MoS2 TFT using this method shows on/off current ratio up to 6×106 order of magnitude, high mobility of 116 cm2/V-sec, and subthreshold swing of only 0.515 V/dec.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: 2D Materials and Applications · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Electrical Engineering, Graduate Institute of Electronics Engineering, National Taiwan University 1 , Taipei 10617, Taiwan

Department of Electrical Engineering, Graduate Institute of Photonics and Optoelectronics, National Taiwan University 2 , Taipei 10617, Taiwan

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. Nat Nanotechnol · 2010 · 5 · 48710.1038/nnano.2010.89 ↗
2. IEEE Electron Device Letters · 1998 · 19 · 38510.1109/55.720194 ↗
3. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices · 1992 · 39 · 170410.1109/16.141237 ↗
4. Applied Physics Letters · 2016 · 108 · 02350610.1063/1.4939933 ↗
5. Applied Physics Letters · 2015 · 107 · 15350710.1063/1.4933346 ↗
6. Applied Physics Letters · 2006 · 89 · 08351310.1063/1.2234724 ↗
7. Nat Nanotechnol · 2011 · 6 · 14710.1038/nnano.2010.279 ↗
8. Applied Physics Letters · 2011 · 99 · 10210910.1063/1.3636402 ↗
9. Nano Lett · 2012 · 12 · 401310.1021/nl301335q ↗
10. Small · 2014 · 10 · 235610.1002/smll.201303908 ↗
11. Sci Rep · 2015 · 5 · 1374310.1038/srep13743 ↗
12. Nano Lett · 2015 · 15 · 303010.1021/nl504957p ↗
13. Sci Rep · 2016 · 6 · 3309610.1038/srep33096 ↗
14. Nano Lett · 2010 · 10 · 127110.1021/nl903868w ↗
15. Applied Physics Letters · 2012 · 101 · 04310310.1063/1.4738986 ↗
16. IEEE Electron Device Letters · 2012 · 33 · 127310.1109/led.2012.2202630 ↗
17. Nano Lett · 2014 · 14 · 318510.1021/nl500515q ↗
18. Journal of Materials Chemistry C · 2013 · 1 · 780310.1039/c3tc31796j ↗
19. Nano Lett · 2013 · 13 · 10010.1021/nl303583v ↗