Effect of indium low doping in ZnO based TFTs on electrical parameters and bias stress stability
Source abstract
Abstract
Some applications of thin film transistors (TFTs) need the bottom-gate architecture and unpassivated channel backside. We propose a simple routine to fabricate indium doped ZnO-based TFT with satisfactory characteristics and acceptable stability against a bias stress in ambient room air. To this end, a channel layer of 15 nm in thickness was deposited on cold substrate by DC reactive magnetron co-sputtering of metal Zn-In target. It is demonstrated that the increase of In concentration in ZnO matrix up to 5% leads to negative threshold voltage (VT) shift and an increase of field effect mobility (μ) and a decrease of subthreshold swing (SS). When dopant concentration reaches the upper level of 5% the best TFT parameters are achieved such as VT = 3.6 V, μ = 15.2 cm2/V s, SS = 0.5 V/dec. The TFTs operate in enhancement mode exhibiting high turn on/turn off current ratio more than 106. It is shown that the oxidative post-fabrication annealing at 250oC in pure oxygen and next ageing in dry air for several hours provide highly stable operational characteristics under negative and positive bias stresses despite open channel backside. A possible cause of this effect is discussed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Thin-Film Transistor Technologies · ZnO doping and properties · Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Petrozavodsk State University Physico-Technical Department, , Petrozavodsk 185910, Russian Federation
Funding
Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. S.-S. Electronics · 2014 · 91 · 910.1016/j.sse.2013.09.008 ↗
2. IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2011 · 32 · 155210.1109/LED.2011.2165694 ↗
3. Elect. Mater. Lett. · 2013 · 9 · 38110.1007/s13391-013-0005-5 ↗
4. J. Mater. Chem. · 2004 · 14 · 410.1039/b310846p ↗
5. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 104 · 11350110.1063/1.4868978 ↗
6. Journal of Crystal Growth · 2003 · 255 · 13010.1016/S0022-0248(03)01243-0 ↗
7. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. · 2013 · 8 · 977310.1016/S1452-3981(23)13011-2 ↗
8. J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 115 · 21450110.1063/1.4880163 ↗
9. Journal of the SID · 2010 · 18 · 749
10. Adv. Mater. · 2012 · 24 · 294510.1002/adma.201103228 ↗
11. Semicond. Sci. Technol. · 2015 · 30 · 02400210.1088/0268-1242/30/2/024002 ↗
12. J. Display Tech. · 2013 · 9 · 88310.1109/JDT.2013.2256878 ↗
13. Thin Solid Films · 2014 · 562 · 59710.1016/j.tsf.2014.04.003 ↗
14. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 93 · 09350410.1063/1.2977865 ↗
15. Applied Physics Express · 2013 · 6 · 03110110.7567/APEX.6.031101 ↗
16. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 95 · 23350410.1063/1.3272016 ↗
17. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 92 · 03350210.1063/1.2824758 ↗
18. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A · 1996 · 14 · 222010.1116/1.580050 ↗
19. IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2011 · 31 · 141610.1109/LED.2010.2080350 ↗
20. ECS J. Solid State Sci. and Tech. · 2013 · 2 · P5-P810.1149/2.006303jss ↗
21. Physical Review B · 2006 · 73 · 11520710.1103/PhysRevB.73.115207 ↗