journal article·2013-06-01Open access

High-resolution photocurrent microscopy using near-field cathodoluminescence of quantum dots

Heayoung P. Yoon, Youngmin Lee, Christopher D. Bohn, Seung-Hyeon Ko, Anthony G. Gianfrancesco, Jonathan S. Steckel, Seth Coe-Sullivan, A. Alec Talin, Nikolai B. Zhitenev

AIP Advances· Volume 3· Issue 6

Abstract

We report a fast, versatile photocurrent imaging technique to visualize the local photo response of solar energy devices and optoelectronics using near-field cathodoluminescence (CL) from a homogeneous quantum dot layer. This approach is quantitatively compared with direct measurements of high-resolution Electron Beam Induced Current (EBIC) using a thin film solar cell (n-CdS / p-CdTe). Qualitatively, the observed image contrast is similar, showing strong enhancement of the carrier collection efficiency at the p-n junction and near the grain boundaries. The spatial resolution of the new technique, termed Q-EBIC (EBIC using quantum dots), is determined by the absorption depth of photons. The results demonstrate a new method for high-resolution, sub-wavelength photocurrent imaging measurement relevant for a wide range of applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Near-Field Optical Microscopy · Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

National Institute of Standards and Technology 1 Center for Nanoscale Science and Technology, , Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA

University of Maryland 2 Maryland Nanocenter, , College Park, MD 20742, USA

Worcester Polytechnic Institute 3 Department of physics, , Worcester, MA 01602, USA

QD Vision Inc. 4 , 29 Hartwell Ave., Lexington, MA 02421, USA

Sandia National Laboratories 5 , Livermore, CA 94550, USA

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. J Appl Phys · 1984 · 55 · 31810.1063/1.333047 ↗
2. Sol Energ Mat Sol C · 2003 · 76 · 59910.1016/S0927-0248(02)00270-2 ↗
3. Appl Phys Lett · 2004 · 85 · 385410.1063/1.1809271 ↗
4. Thin Solid Films · 2011 · 519 · 733210.1016/j.tsf.2010.12.213 ↗
5. Thin Solid Films · 2000 · 372 · 28410.1016/S0040-6090(00)00963-9 ↗
6. Nano Lett · 2012 · 12 · 145310.1021/nl204126n ↗
7. 38th IEEE PVSC · 2012 · 3217
8. Scanning · 2011 · 33 · 110.1002/sca.20222 ↗
9. Phys Chem Chem Phys · 2009 · 11 · 513010.1039/b816893h ↗
10. IEEE J Quantum Elect QE · 1968 · 4 · 18610.1109/JQE.1968.1075041 ↗
11. 1998
12. Rev Mod Phys · 2010 · 82 · 20910.1103/RevModPhys.82.209 ↗
13. J Appl Phys · 1968 · 39 · 202910.1063/1.1656484 ↗
14. J Appl Phys · 1982 · 53 · R5110.1063/1.331667 ↗
15. Opt Express · 2010 · 18 · 1289710.1364/OE.18.012897 ↗
16. Nat Nanotechnol · 2011 · 6 · 69510.1038/nnano.2011.161 ↗
17. Opt Express · 2012 · 20 · 562910.1364/OE.20.005629 ↗
18. See supplementary material at http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4811275 for fluorescence and photoluminescence spectra, size of the QDs and the thickness of the QD layer, a set of CL spectra at different acceleration voltages, details of analytical and FDTD calculations, estimated CL fractions, and for more comparison.
19. Science · 2011 · 334 · 153010.1126/science.1209845 ↗
20. Nano Lett · 2008 · 8 · 390410.1021/nl802353x ↗
21. Curr Sci India · 2011 · 101 · 849
22. Thin Solid Films · 2000 · 366 · 27210.1016/S0040-6090(00)00728-8 ↗
23. 2007
24. Scanning · 2007 · 29 · 9210.1002/sca.20000 ↗
25. J Appl Phys · 1977 · 48 · 82910.1063/1.323636 ↗
26. Adv Mater · 2006 · 18 · 7710.1002/adma.200501434 ↗
27. Nano Lett · 2005 · 5 · 86510.1021/nl0502672 ↗
28. Appl Phys Lett · 2011 · 98
29. J Appl Phys · 1986 · 59 · R110.1063/1.336491 ↗
30. J Appl Phys · 2007 · 10110.1063/1.2435075 ↗
31. J Appl Phys · 1984 · 55 · 155810.1063/1.333414 ↗
32. J Am Chem Soc · 1987 · 109 · 355910.1021/ja00246a011 ↗