Influence of the gate edge on the reverse leakage current of AlGaN/GaN HEMTs
Source abstract
Abstract
By comparing the Schottky diodes of different area and perimeter, reverse gate leakage current of AlGaN/GaN high mobility transistors (HEMT) at gate bias beyond threshold voltage is studied. It is revealed that reverse current consists of area-related and perimeter-related current. An analytical model of electric field calculation is proposed to obtain the average electric field around the gate edge at high revers bias and estimate the effective range of edge leakage current. When the reverse bias increases, the increment of electric field is around the gate edge of a distance of ΔL, and perimeter-related gate edge current keeps increasing. By using the calculated electric field and the temperature-dependent current-voltage measurements, the edge gate leakage current mechanism is found to be Fowler-Nordheim tunneling at gate bias bellows -15V caused by the lateral extended depletion region induced barrier thinning. Effective range of edge current of Schottky diodes is about hundred to several hundred nano-meters, and is different in different shapes of Schottky diodes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials · Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design · Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Xidian University 1 Key Laboratory of Wide Band Gap Semiconductor Materials and Devices, School of Microelectronics, , Xi’an 710071, People’s Republic of China
Xidian University 2 School of Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology, , Xi’an 710071, People’s Republic of China
Funding
National Key Basic Research Program of China · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Electron Device Letters, IEEE · 2004 · 25 · 11710.1109/LED.2003.822667 ↗
2. Journal of Applied Physics · 2006 · 99 · 02370310.1063/1.2159547 ↗
3. Applied Physics Letters · 2004 · 84 · 488410.1063/1.1762980 ↗
4. Electron Devices, IEEE Transactions on · 2008 · 55 · 55710.1109/TED.2007.912993 ↗
5. Solid-state Electron. · 1971 · 14 · 90110.1016/0038-1101(71)90157-2 ↗
6. Electron Devices, IEEE Transactions on · 1980 · 27 · 101310.1109/T-ED.1980.19979 ↗
7. Applied Physics Letters · 2010 · 97 · 15350310.1063/1.3499364 ↗
8. Applied Physics Letters · 2013 · 102 · 11351010.1063/1.4798257 ↗
9. Electron Devices, IEEE Transactions on · 2011 · 58 · 198610.1109/TED.2011.2146254 ↗
10. Applied Physics Letters · 2014 · 104 · 09350410.1063/1.4867525 ↗
11. Applied Surface Science · 2002 · 190 · 32210.1016/S0169-4332(01)00902-3 ↗
12. Electron Devices, IEEE Transactions on · 2013 · 60 · 315710.1109/TED.2013.2272700 ↗
13. Applied Physics Letters · 2004 · 84 · 53510.1063/1.1644029 ↗
14. Applied Physics Letters · 2012 · 101 · 25351910.1063/1.4773244 ↗
15. Journal of Applied Physics · 2004 · 95 · 641410.1063/1.1719264 ↗
16. Journal of Applied Physics · 1999 · 85 · 322210.1063/1.369664 ↗
17. Electron Devices, IEEE Transactions on · 2014 · 61 · 75510.1109/TED.2014.2298255 ↗
18. Journal of Applied Physics · 2015 · 118 · 03450310.1063/1.4926478 ↗
19. M. H. Somerville and J. A. del Alamo, Electron Devices Meeting, 1996. IEDM ’96., International (1996) p. 35.
20. Journal of Applied Physics · 1982 · 53 · 505210.1063/1.331336 ↗