journal article·2017-05-01Open access

Effect of disorder on the resistivity of CoFeCrAl films

Y. Jin, R. Skomski, P. Kharel, S. R. Valloppilly, D. J. Sellmyer

AIP Advances· Volume 7· Issue 5

Abstract

Structural and electron-transport properties of thin films of the ferrimagnetic Heusler compound CoFeCrAl have been investigated to elucidate structure-property relationships. The alloy is, ideally, a spin-gapless semiconductor, but structural disorder destroys the spin-gapless character and drastically alters the transport behavior. Two types of CoFeCrAl films were grown by magnetron sputtering deposition at 973 K, namely polycrystalline films on Si substrates and epitaxial films on MgO (001) substrates. The resistivity decreases with increasing temperature, with relatively small temperature coefficients of –0.19 μΩcm/K for the polycrystalline films and –0.12 μΩcm/K for the epitaxial films. The residual resistivity of the polycrystalline films deposited on Si is higher than that of the epitaxial film deposited on MgO, indicating that the polycrystalline films behave as so-called dirty metals.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Heusler alloys: electronic and magnetic properties · Multiferroics and related materials · 2D Materials and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

University of Nebraska 1 Department of Physics and Astronomy, , Lincoln, Nebraska 68588, USA

University of Nebraska 2 Nebraska Center for Materials and Nanoscience, , Lincoln, Nebraska 68588, USA

South Dakota State University 3 Department of Physics, , Brookings, South Dakota 57007, USA

Funding

Division of Materials Research · Division of Electrical, Communications and Cyber Systems

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 100 · 15640410.1103/physrevlett.101.069902 ↗
2. Adv. Mater. · 2009 · 21 · 219610.1002/adma.200802868 ↗
3. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2013 · 110 · 10040110.1103/physrevlett.110.100401 ↗
4. AIP Adv. · 2016 · 6 · 05630410.1063/1.4943306 ↗
5. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2015 · 394 · 8210.1016/j.jmmm.2015.05.095 ↗
6. Phys. Rev. B · 2015 · 91 · 10440810.1103/physrevb.91.104408 ↗
7. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 103 · 14240310.1063/1.4823601 ↗
8. 1996
9. Science · 2004 · 306 · 66610.1038/nature04233 ↗
10. J. Appl. Phys. · 2016 · 120 · 05390310.1063/1.4960350 ↗
11. J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 113 · 19390310.1063/1.4805063 ↗
12. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 104 · 24240810.1063/1.4884203 ↗
13. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 48 · 24500210.1088/0022-3727/48/24/245002 ↗
14. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2016 · 109 · 14241010.1063/1.4964464 ↗
15. Phys. Stat. Sol. (a) · 1973 · 17 · 52110.1002/pssa.2210170217 ↗
16. Z. Phys. B · 1981 · 41 · 29110.1007/BF01307318 ↗
17. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2003 · 83 · 45510.1063/1.1593826 ↗
18. Phys. Rev. B · 1984 · 29 · 592110.1103/physrevb.29.5920 ↗
19. 2006 · 165
20. Phys. Rev. B · 1998 · 58 · 278810.1103/physrevb.58.2788 ↗
21. NPG Asia Mater. · 2010 · 2 · 3110.1038/asiamat.2010.7 ↗
22. J. Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 105 · 07B10910.1063/1.3075989 ↗
23. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. · 2003 · 15 · R112310.1088/0953-8984/15/25/202 ↗