journal article·2020-10-01Open access

Magnetic flux modulation with electric controlled permeability for magnetoresistive sensor

Yulu Che, Jiafei Hu, Long Pan, Peisen Li, Mengchun Pan, Dixiang Chen, Kun Sun, Xinmiao Zhang, Qingfa Du, Yang Yu, Yueguo Hu, Minhui Ji, Lan Yang, Junping Peng, Weicheng Qiu, Qi Zhang

AIP Advances· Volume 10· Issue 10

Abstract

Owing to the attractive advantages of the simple preparation process, convenient frequency adjustment, and stable mechanical structure, magnetic flux modulation with electric controlled permeability exhibits a better performance in the reduction of 1/f noise for magnetoresistive (MR) sensors than other schemes of magnetic flux modulation. However, the magnetic flux electric modulation (MFEM) has not been experimentally verified. In this work, a prototype of the MFEM structure was established by preparing an FeGaB film on a Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)0.7O3–PbTi0.3O3 substrate, and the modulation structure was integrated into an MR sensor. A test system was built to evaluate the modulation efficiency of the MFEM structure, and the results showed that the modulation efficiency reached 9.8% with an applied electric field of 2 kV/cm at a frequency of 10 010 Hz. Meanwhile, experiments were carried out to study the effects of driving electric fields’ amplitude and frequency on modulation efficiency, and it was revealed that the modulation efficiency could be further improved by increasing the amplitude of driving voltage and reducing the thickness of the ferroelectric layer.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Field Sensors Techniques · Magnetic Properties and Applications · Multiferroics and related materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Intelligence Science and Technology, National University of Defense Technology , Changsha 410073, China

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation · National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. IEEE Magn. Lett. · 2020 · 11 · 110.1109/lmag.2020.2982851 ↗
2. AIP Adv. · 2017 · 7 · 05667610.1063/1.4978465 ↗
3. Sens. Actuators, A · 2006 · 129 · 8610.1016/j.sna.2005.11.023 ↗
4. Science · 2004 · 304 · 164810.1126/science.1096841 ↗
5. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 86 · 25390110.1063/1.1952582 ↗
6. J. Appl. Phys. · 2006 · 99 · 08B30710.1063/1.2165148 ↗
7. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 91 · 10250410.1063/1.2775802 ↗
8. Mod. Phys. Lett. B · 2019 · 33 · 195008510.1142/s0217984919500854 ↗
9. J. Appl. Phys. · 2003 · 93 · 838210.1063/1.1555975 ↗
10. Measurement · 2017 · 109 · 29710.1016/j.measurement.2017.05.062 ↗
11. J. Appl. Phys. · 2005 · 97 · 10Q10710.1063/1.1861375 ↗
12. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2006 · 42 · 330610.1109/tmag.2006.879752 ↗
13. J. Appl. Phys. · 2002 · 91 · 779510.1063/1.1451901 ↗
14. J. Appl. Phys. · 2006 · 99 · 08B31710.1063/1.2170067 ↗
15. IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2019 · 40 · 182410.1109/led.2019.2944645 ↗
16. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 101 · 23410110.1063/1.4769903 ↗
17. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 24410210.1063/1.4729427 ↗
18. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2013 · 84 · 3500410.1063/1.4796094 ↗
19. Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2012 · 83 · 5500910.1063/1.4723823 ↗
20. Sensors · 2020 · 20 · 144010.3390/s20051440 ↗
21. Adv. Electron. Mater. · 2020 · 6 · 190106110.1002/aelm.201901061 ↗
22. Sci. Rep. · 2015 · 5 · 1111110.1038/srep11111 ↗
23. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 98 · 20250210.1063/1.3590771 ↗
24. Mater. Res. Express · 2015 · 2 · 05500610.1088/2053-1591/2/5/055006 ↗
25. Measurement · 2018 · 127 · 51210.1016/j.measurement.2018.06.027 ↗
26. Adv. Mater. · 2009 · 21 · 471110.1002/adma.200901131 ↗
27. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 98 · 01250410.1063/1.3534788 ↗
28. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 02240110.1063/1.3675458 ↗
29. Sens. Actuators, A · 2009 · 155 · 21710.1016/j.sna.2009.08.016 ↗