journal article·2022-03-01Open access

A discussion on various experimental methods of impact ionization coefficient measurement in GaN

Dong Ji, Ke Zeng, Zhengliang Bian, Bhawani Shankar, Brendan P. Gunning, Andrew Binder, Jeramy R. Dickerson, Ozgur Aktas, Travis J. Anderson, Robert J. Kaplar, Srabanti Chowdhury

AIP Advances· Volume 12· Issue 3

Abstract

Impact ionization coefficients play a critical role in semiconductors. In addition to silicon, silicon carbide and gallium nitride are important semiconductors that are being seen more as mainstream semiconductor technologies. As a reflection of the maturity of these semiconductors, predictive modeling has become essential to device and circuit designers, and impact ionization coefficients play a key role here. Recently, several studies have measured impact ionization coefficients. We dedicated the first part of our study to comparing three experimental methods to estimate impact ionization coefficients in GaN, which are all based on photomultiplication but feature characteristic differences. The first method inserts an InGaN hole-injection layer, the accuracy of which is challenged by the dominance of ionization in InGaN, leading to possible overestimation of the coefficients. The second method utilizes the Franz–Keldysh effect for hole injection but not for electrons, where the mixed injection of induced carriers would require a margin of error. The third method uses complementary p–n and n–p structures that have been at the basis of this estimation in Si and SiC and leans on the assumption of a constant electric field, and any deviation would require a margin of error. In the second part of our study, we evaluated the models using recent experimental data from diodes demonstrating avalanche breakdown.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials · Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies · Ga2O3 and related materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Stanford University 1 , Stanford, California 94305, USA

Sandia National Laboratory 2 , Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185, USA

Edynx, Inc. 3 , Pleasanton, California 94566, USA

Naval Research Laboratory 4 , Washington, DC 20375, USA

Funding

Advanced Research Projects Agency–Energy

References (57)

Show source-provided references
1. 2008 · 91
2. 2013 · 59
3. IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2016 · 37 · 16110.1109/led.2015.2506638 ↗
4. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2019 · 58 · SCCD2510.7567/1347-4065/ab106c ↗
5. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2019 · 58 · SCCD0310.7567/1347-4065/ab0cfa ↗
6. IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2020 · 41 · 132810.1109/led.2020.3010784 ↗
7. IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2020 · 41 · 26410.1109/led.2019.2960349 ↗
8. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2020 · 117 · 25210710.1063/5.0031504 ↗
9. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2019 · 115 · 07350310.1063/1.5099245 ↗
10. 2020 · 1
11. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2018 · 112 · 26210310.1063/1.5031785 ↗
12. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2021 · 68 · 122810.1109/ted.2021.3054355 ↗
13. Phys. Status Solidi B · 2020 · 257 · 190037310.1002/pssb.201900373 ↗
14. 2018 · 689
15. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2019 · 115 · 14210110.1063/1.5114844 ↗
16. 2019 · 59
17. 2019 · 70
18. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2021 · 118 · 21210210.1063/5.0051552 ↗
19. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2014 · 60 · 306710.1109/TED.2013.2266664 ↗
20. IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2020 · 41 · 46910.1109/led.2020.2970552 ↗
21. 2020 · 1
22. Electron. Lett. · 2015 · 51 · 100910.1049/el.2015.1551 ↗
23. L. Cao, Ph.D. thesis, Notre Dame University, 2020.
24. Appl. Phys. Express · 2021 · 14 · 04650110.35848/1882-0786/abe3dc ↗
25. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2020 · 116 · 21110210.1063/1.5140005 ↗
26. Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol. · 2017 · 10 · 129
27. Proc. SPIE · 2019 · 10918 · 109181410.1117/12.2507880 ↗
28. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. · 2020 · 32 · 135710.1109/lpt.2020.3025290 ↗
29. IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 1999 · 20 · 60810.1109/55.806100 ↗
30. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 89 · 18352410.1063/1.2385216 ↗
31. 2012
32. IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2020 · 41 · 89210.1109/led.2020.2987282 ↗
33. Solid-State Electron. · 1970 · 13 · 58310.1016/0038-1101(70)90139-5 ↗
34. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2003 · 50 · 202710.1109/ted.2003.816918 ↗
35. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2015 · 62 · 332610.1109/ted.2015.2466445 ↗
36. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2008 · 55 · 198410.1109/ted.2008.926679 ↗
37. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1997 · 71 · 257210.1063/1.120191 ↗
38. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 96 · 02190810.1063/1.3291055 ↗
39. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. · 2003 · 18 · 90710.1109/tpel.2003.810840 ↗
40. Solid-State Electron. · 1982 · 25 · 118910.1016/0038-1101(82)90079-x ↗
41. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1996 · 68 · 278410.1063/1.116606 ↗
42. Appl. Phys. Express · 2016 · 9 · 09100210.7567/apex.9.091002 ↗
43. Phys. Rev. B · 1995 · 52 · 813210.1103/physrevb.52.8132 ↗
44. Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 85 · 19514710.1103/physrevb.85.195147 ↗
45. J. Appl. Phys. · 2021 · 129 · 18570210.1063/5.0050793 ↗
46. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. · 2014 · 26 · 99910.1109/lpt.2014.2312022 ↗
47. J. Korean Phys. Soc. · 2004 · 45 · 936
48. Levinshtein · 2001 · 1
49. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. · 2018 · 78 · 7510.1016/j.mssp.2017.09.033 ↗
50. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. · 2014 · 3 · N12710.1149/2.0201410jss ↗
51. J. Mater. Chem. C · 2017 · 5 · 833810.1039/c7tc02221b ↗
52. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2020 · 67 · 245710.1109/ted.2020.2987040 ↗
53. Phys. Status Solidi A · 2021 · 218 · 200046910.1002/pssa.202000469 ↗
54. Phys. Status Solidi B · 2020 · 257 · 190052810.1002/pssb.201900528 ↗
55. J. Appl. Phys. · 1999 · 85 · 322210.1063/1.369664 ↗
56. J. Appl. Phys. · 2000 · 87 · 33410.1063/1.371866 ↗
57. Phys. Rev. B · 1973 · 7 · 74310.1103/physrevb.7.743 ↗