journal article·2019-03-01Open access

Investigation of etching optimization in capacitively coupled SF6–O2 plasma

Khaled Ali Alshaltami, Stephen Daniels

AIP Advances· Volume 9· Issue 3

Abstract

The selective etching process is widely used for achieving the desired etch rate in semiconductor fabrication. Parameters such as input power, operating pressure, gas mixture, chamber geometry, and amplitude of the radio-frequency voltage govern the etch rate and etch quality in plasma. In this work, we experimentally investigated the optimum plasma etching conditions required to achieve an anisotropic etch profile and analyzed how the optimum etching can be carried out using an appropriate operating pressure and oxygen concentration. Optical emission spectroscopy was used to measure the concentrations of oxygen and fluorine, and Langmuir probe was used to measure the electron density in the plasma. The oxygen concentration was varied from zero to 100 vol. % for pressures in the range of 20–600 mTorr. The optimum etch conditions are used to study the ion energy distribution given by Kawamura et al., Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 8, R45 (1999). The results suggest that in addition to O2% and pressure, the DC bias is another crucial parameter for achieving the optimum etch conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Plasma Diagnostics and Applications · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Semiconductor materials and devices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

National Centre for Plasma Science and Technology (NCPST), Research and Engineering Building, Dublin City University 1 , Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland

School of Electronic Engineering, Dublin City University 2 , Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland

Funding

Ministry of Education

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. J. Appl. Phys. · 1981 · 52 · 16210.1063/1.328468 ↗
2. Bell Labs Tech. J. · 1999 · 4 · 155
3. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A · 2013 · 31 · 05082510.1116/1.4819316 ↗
4. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A · 2017 · 35 · 02130810.1116/1.4973299 ↗
5. J. Phys. D. · 1986 · 19 · 99110.1088/0022-3727/19/6/014 ↗
6. Vacuum. · 2004 · 77 · 110.1016/j.vacuum.2004.07.063 ↗
7. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A · 2014 · 32 · 04130210.1116/1.4880800 ↗
8. Microsystem Technologies. · 2004 · 10 · 60310.1007/s00542-003-0338-3 ↗
9. Plasma Science and Technology. · 2012 · 14 · 31610.1088/1009-0630/14/4/09 ↗
10. Vacuum. · 2008 · 82 · 119110.1016/j.vacuum.2008.01.047 ↗
11. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A · 2017 · 35 · 03130710.1116/1.4981785 ↗
12. Www.oxfordinstruments.com.
13. C. R. Scott and P. M. Troccolo, US patent 5, 935,777 (1999).
14. American Journal of Physics. · 2007 · 75 · 107810.1119/1.2772282 ↗
15. J. Phys. D. · 1975 · 8 · 14110.1088/0022-3727/8/2/007 ↗
16. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. · 2002 · 11 · A2610.1088/0963-0252/11/3a/303 ↗
17. Plasma Chem Plasma Process · 1985 · 5 · 23910.1007/bf00615123 ↗
18. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. · 2013 · 22 · 04500410.1088/0963-0252/22/4/045004 ↗
19. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. · 2008 · 17 · 03502610.1088/0963-0252/17/3/035026 ↗
20. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. · 1999 · 8 · R4510.1088/0963-0252/8/3/202 ↗
21. 2005 · 445
22. 2005 · 175
23. J. Appl. Phys. · 1980 · 51 · 313410.1063/1.328060 ↗
24. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci · 2010 · 38 · 151210.1109/tps.2010.2046500 ↗
25. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. · 2012 · 21 · 02400410.1088/0963-0252/21/2/024004 ↗