journal article·2016-07-01Open access

Design criteria for XeF2 enabled deterministic transformation of bulk silicon (100) into flexible silicon layer

Aftab M. Hussain, Sohail F. Shaikh, Muhammad M. Hussain

AIP Advances· Volume 6· Issue 7

Abstract

Isotropic etching of bulk silicon (100) using Xenon Difluoride (XeF2) gas presents a unique opportunity to undercut and release ultra-thin flexible silicon layers with pre-fabricated state-of-the-art Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor (CMOS) electronics. In this work, we present design criteria and mechanism with a comprehensive mathematical model for this method. We consider various trench geometries and parametrize important metrics such as etch time, number of cycles and area efficiency in terms of the trench diameter and spacing so that optimization can be done for specific applications. From our theoretical analysis, we conclude that a honeycomb-inspired hexagonal distribution of trenches can produce the most efficient release of ultra-thin flexible silicon layers in terms of the number of etch cycles, while a rectangular distribution of circular trenches provides the most area efficient design. The theoretical results are verified by fabricating and releasing (varying sizes) flexible silicon layers. We observe uniform translation of design criteria into practice for etch distances and number of etch cycles, using reaction efficiency as a fitting parameter.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Energy Harvesting in Wireless Networks · Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) Integrated Nanotechnology Laboratory (INL) and Integrated Disruptive Electronics Applications (IDEA) Laboratory, Computer Electrical Mathematical Science and Engineering Division, , Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Adv. Healthcare Mater. · 2015 · 4 · 66510.1002/adhm.201400647 ↗
2. Small · 2012 · 8 · 326310.1002/smll.201200933 ↗
3. Nanotechnology · 2012 · 23 · 34400410.1088/0957-4484/23/34/344004 ↗
4. Adv. Mater. Technol. · 2016 · 1 · 160000410.1002/admt.201600004 ↗
5. Anal. Lett. · 2006 · 39 · 175910.1080/00032710600714089 ↗
6. Mater. Today · 2011 · 14 · 42410.1016/S1369-7021(11)70187-0 ↗
7. Adv. Robotics · 2015 · 29 · 135910.1080/01691864.2015.1095653 ↗
8. Soft Robotics · 2013 · 1 · 5310.1089/soro.2013.0005 ↗
9. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2004 · 101 · 996610.1073/pnas.0401918101 ↗
10. Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2015 · 25 · 656510.1002/adfm.201503277 ↗
11. Electronics · 2015 · 4 · 42410.3390/electronics4030424 ↗
12. IEEE Antenn. Wireless Propag. Lett. · 2011 · 10 · 110810.1109/LAWP.2011.2170398 ↗
13. Adv. Mater. · 201510.1002/adma.201504236 ↗
14. Proc. IEEE · 2015 · 103 · 61910.1109/JPROC.2015.2396991 ↗
15. ACS Nano · 2014 · 8 · 146810.1021/nn405475k ↗
16. Small · 2013 · 9 · 391610.1002/smll.201301025 ↗
17. Phys. Status Solidi RRL · 2014 · 8 · 16310.1002/pssr.201308209 ↗
18. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2016 · 108 · 09410210.1063/1.4943020 ↗
19. AIP Adv. · 2015 · 5 · 12711510.1063/1.4938101 ↗
20. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2015 · 107 · 17410110.1063/1.4934355 ↗
21. Nature · 2011 · 477 · 4510.1038/nature10381 ↗
22. Phys. Status Solidi RRL · 2014 · 8 · 79410.1002/pssr.201409257 ↗