journal article·2018-03-01Open access

Effect of channel-width and chirality on graphene field-effect transistor based real-time biomolecule sensing

Letian Lyu, Perveshwer Jaswal, Guangyu Xu

AIP Advances· Volume 8· Issue 3

Abstract

Graphene field-effect transistors (GFET) hold promise in biomolecule sensing due to the outstanding properties of graphene materials. Charges in biomolecules are transduced into a change in the GFET current, which allows real-time monitoring of the biomolecule concentrations. Here we theoretically evaluate the performance of GFET based real-time biomolecule sensing, aiming to better understand the width-scaling limit in GFET based biosensors. In particular, we study the effect of the channel-width and the chirality on FET sensitivity by taking the percentage change of the FET current per unit charge density as the sensing signal. Firstly, GFETs made of graphene nanoribbons (GNR) and graphene sheets (GS) show comparable sensing signals to each other when gated at 1011 – 1012 cm-2 carrier densities. Sensing signals in GNRs are enhanced when gated near the sub-band thresholds, and increase their values in wider GNRs due to the change in device conductance and quantum capacitance. Secondly, the GNR chirality is found to fine tune the sensing signals. Armchair GNRs with smaller energy bandgaps appear to have an enhanced sensing signal close to 1011 cm-2 carrier densities. These results may help understand the scaling limit in GFET based biosensors along the width direction, and shed light on forming all-electrical bio-arrays.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications · Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Massachusetts , Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, USA

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. IEEE Sensors J. · 2011 · 11 · 315310.1109/jsen.2011.2167143 ↗
2. Sens. Actuators B, Chem. · 2005 · 111–112 · 47010.1016/j.snb.2005.03.083 ↗
3. ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 615010.1021/nn301495k ↗
4. Chem. Rev. · 2008 · 108 · 10910.1021/cr0684467 ↗
5. Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2011 · 6 · 12610.1038/nnano.2010.275 ↗
6. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2016 · 63 · 3249
7. Science · 2001 · 293 · 128910.1126/science.1062711 ↗
8. Nano Lett. · 2004 · 4 · 5110.1021/nl034853b ↗
9. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA · 2006 · 103 · 92110.1073/pnas.0504146103 ↗
10. Nat. Commun. · 2014 · 5 · 486610.1038/ncomms5866 ↗
11. Nat. Commun. · 2013 · 4 · 222510.1038/ncomms3225 ↗
12. Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2012 · 41 · 228310.1039/c1cs15270j ↗
13. Proc. IEEE · 2013 · 101 · 178010.1109/jproc.2013.2261031 ↗
14. Adv. Mater. · 2010 · 22 · 164910.1002/adma.200903645 ↗
15. Nature · 2012 · 490 · 19210.1038/nature11458 ↗
16. Nano Lett. · 2009 · 9 · 331810.1021/nl901596m ↗
17. Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 109810.1021/nl1002608 ↗
18. Proc. IEEE · 2013 · 101 · 167010.1109/jproc.2013.2247971 ↗
19. Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2009 · 81 · 10910.1103/revmodphys.81.109 ↗
20. Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2011 · 83 · 40710.1103/revmodphys.83.407 ↗
21. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 91 · 09210910.1063/1.2776887 ↗
22. Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 78 · 161409(R)10.1103/physrevb.78.161409 ↗
23. Nano Lett. · 2007 · 7 · 193510.1021/nl0706190 ↗
24. Nat. Commun. · 2014 · 5 · 331710.1038/ncomms4317 ↗
25. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 96 · 10310910.1063/1.3352559 ↗
26. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 98 · 24311810.1063/1.3599596 ↗
27. Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 98 · 16540410.1103/physrevb.79.165404 ↗
28. Nano Letters · 2010 · 10 · 459010.1021/nl1025979 ↗
29. 2004
30. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 91 · 11210810.1063/1.2783196 ↗