Ambipolar transport in CVD grown MoSe2 monolayer using an ionic liquid gel gate dielectric
Source abstract
Abstract
CVD grown MoSe2 monolayers were electrically characterized at room temperature in a field effect transistor (FET) configuration using an ionic liquid (IL) as the gate dielectric. During the growth, instead of using MoO3 powder, ammonium heptamolybdate was used for better Mo control of the source and sodium cholate added for lager MoSe2 growth areas. In addition, a high specific capacitance (∼7 μF/cm2) IL was used as the gate dielectric to significantly reduce the operating voltage. The device exhibited ambipolar charge transport at low voltages with enhanced parameters during n- and p-FET operation. IL gating thins the Schottky barrier at the metal/semiconductor interface permitting efficient charge injection into the channel and reduces the effects of contact resistance on device performance. The large specific capacitance of the IL was also responsible for a much higher induced charge density compared to the standard SiO2 dielectric. The device was successfully tested as an inverter with a gain of ∼2. Using a common metal for contacts simplifies fabrication of this ambipolar device, and the possibility of radiative recombination of holes and electrons could further extend its use in low power optoelectronic applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 2D Materials and Applications · MXene and MAX Phase Materials · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physics and Electronics, University of Puerto Rico-Humacao 1 , Humacao, PR 00791, USA
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania 2 , Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
Funding
Division of Materials Research · Directorate for Engineering
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 557610.1021/nl302584w ↗
2. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 101 · 22310410.1063/1.4768218 ↗
3. Nat. Nanotechnology · 2014 · 9 · 11110.1038/nnano.2013.277 ↗
4. ACS Nano · 2017 · 11 · 635510.1021/acsnano.7b02726 ↗
5. ACS Nano · 2014 · 8 · 512510.1021/nn501175k ↗
6. Nano Lett. · 2014 · 14 · 241910.1021/nl5000906 ↗
7. RSC Adv. · 2017 · 7 · 2796910.1039/c7ra03642f ↗
8. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2015 · 106 · 17310610.1063/1.4919524 ↗
9. Nano Lett. · 2014 · 14 · 46410.1021/nl4033704 ↗
10. ACS Nano · 2014 · 8 · 507910.1021/nn501150r ↗
11. ACS Nano · 2014 · 8 · 792310.1021/nn501693d ↗
12. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2015 · 106 · 19350410.1063/1.4921238 ↗
13. Thin Solid Films · 2017 · 636 · 73710.1016/j.tsf.2017.07.012 ↗
14. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 88 · 23211410.1063/1.2210294 ↗
15. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 102 · 01211110.1063/1.4774090 ↗
16. Curr. Appl. Phys. · 2017 · 17 · 32110.1016/j.cap.2016.10.006 ↗
17. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 104 · 11350410.1063/1.4868536 ↗
18. ACS Nano · 2013 · 7 · 444910.1021/nn401053g ↗
19. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 104 · 17111210.1063/1.4872002 ↗
20. Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 113610.1021/nl2021575 ↗
21. Nano Lett. · 2014 · 14 · 359410.1021/nl501275p ↗
22. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2015 · 106 · 08350710.1063/1.4913714 ↗
23. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2017 · 9 · 3600910.1021/acsami.7b10693 ↗