The effects of interfacial recombination and injection barrier on the electrical characteristics of perovskite solar cells
Source abstract
Abstract
Charge carrier recombination in the perovskite solar cells (PSCs) has a deep influence on the electrical performance, such as open circuit voltage, short circuit current, fill factor and ultimately power conversion efficiency. The impacts of injection barrier, recombination channels, doping properties of carrier transport layers and light intensity on the performance of PSCs are theoretically investigated by drift-diffusion model in this work. The results indicate that due to the injection barrier at the interfaces of perovskite and carrier transport layer, the accumulated carriers modify the electric field distribution throughout the PSCs. Thus, a zero electric field is generated at a specific applied voltage, with greatly increases the interfacial recombination, resulting in a local kink of current density-voltage (J-V) curve. This work provides an effective strategy to improve the efficiency of PSCs by pertinently reducing both the injection barrier and interfacial recombination.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies · solar cell performance optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Science, Huaihai Institute of Technology 1 , Lianyungang 222005, P. R. China
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The University of Hong Kong 2 , Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong
College of Information Science & Electronic Engineering, Zhejiang University 3 , Hangzhou 310027, P. R. China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Science · 2014 · 345 · 54210.1126/science.1254050 ↗
2. Science · 2015 · 348 · 123410.1126/science.aaa9272 ↗
3. Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2016 · 45 · 65510.1039/c4cs00458b ↗
4. ACS Energy Lett. · 2017 · 2 · 68110.1021/acsenergylett.7b00059 ↗
5. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2015 · 6 · 85210.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00289 ↗
6. Energy Environ. Sci. · 2014 · 7 · 369010.1039/c4ee02465f ↗
7. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2016 · 7 · 90510.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00215 ↗
8. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2014 · 5 · 235710.1021/jz5011187 ↗
9. ACS Nano · 2014 · 8 · 1270110.1021/nn505723h ↗
10. Energy Environ. Sci. · 2015 · 8 · 211810.1039/c5ee01265a ↗
11. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2014 · 5 · 333510.1021/jz501697b ↗
12. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells · 2018 · 174 · 20610.1016/j.solmat.2017.09.002 ↗
13. Adv. Energy Mater. · 2017 · 7 · 160243210.1002/aenm.201602432 ↗
14. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2015 · 18 · 447610.1039/c5cp05371d ↗
15. Nat. Commun. · 2016 · 7 · 1383110.1038/ncomms13831 ↗
16. Energy Environ. Sci. · 2016 · 9 · 147610.1039/c5ee02740c ↗
17. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2015 · 6 · 380810.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01645 ↗
18. Adv. Energy Mater. · 2017 · 7 · 170062310.1002/aenm.201700623 ↗
19. Energy Environ. Sci. · 2017 · 10 · 120710.1039/c7ee00421d ↗
20. R. Soc. Open Sci. · 2017 · 4 · 17098010.1098/rsos.170980 ↗
21. J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 116 · 5450510.1063/1.4891982 ↗
22. 1984
23. 2005
24. Opt. Express · 2012 · 20 · 257210.1364/oe.20.002572 ↗
25. J. Appl. Phys. · 2016 · 120 · 21310110.1063/1.4970958 ↗
26. Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2017 · 405 · 41210.1016/j.apsusc.2017.02.057 ↗
27. ACS Energy Lett. · 2017 · 2 · 121410.1021/acsenergylett.7b00236 ↗
28. APL Mater. · 2014 · 2 · 8150410.1063/1.4890056 ↗