journal article·2017-11-01Open access

Pulse discharge properties of PLZST antiferroelectric ceramics compared with ferroelectric and linear dielectrics

Chenhong Xu, Zhen Liu, Xuefeng Chen, Shiguang Yan, Fei Cao, Xianlin Dong, Genshui Wang

AIP Advances· Volume 7· Issue 11

Abstract

The pulse discharge properties of lead lanthanum zirconate stannate titanate (PLZST) antiferroelectric (AFE) ceramics, ferroelectric (FE) dielectrics, and linear dielectrics were compared in this paper. It is found that as the voltage increases, those three types of dielectrics display three different voltage-dependent regularities: the peak current (Imax) of linear dielectrics increases linearly with increasing voltage; the Imax of FE dielectrics rises up with a gradually declined increase rate; the Imax of PLZST AFE ceramics presents a three-stage growth and during the third stage, the regularity is similar with that of FE dielectrics. Furthermore, three advantages of PLZST AFE ceramics for pulse discharge can be determined: a large increase rate of Imax due the field-forced AFE-FE phase transition, a great enhanced power density and a relatively short discharge period time. These results would pave the way for understanding and utilizing AFE ceramics in pulse power application.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Dielectric materials and actuators · Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Key Laboratory of Inorganic Functional Materials and Devices, Shanghai Institute of Ceramics, Chinese Academy of Sciences 1 , 1295 Dingxi Road, Shanghai 200050, People’s Republic of China

University of Chinese Academy of Sciences 2 , Beijing 100049, P. R. China

Funding

Shanghai Sailing Program · National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (17)

Show source-provided references
1. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2001 · 37 · 32410.1109/20.911847 ↗
2. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2001 · 37 · 33210.1109/20.911849 ↗
3. Proc IRE · 1961 · 49 · 126410.1109/jrproc.1961.287917 ↗
4. J. Appl. Phys. · 2016 · 119 · 02410410.1063/1.4939617 ↗
5. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2016 · 99 · 356910.1111/jace.14406 ↗
6. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2016 · 99 · 385310.1111/jace.14592 ↗
7. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2016 · 109 · 26290110.1063/1.4973425 ↗
8. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2016 · 99 · 290910.1111/jace.14446 ↗
9. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2005 · 41 · 28110.1109/tmag.2004.839281 ↗
10. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2010 · 93 · 401510.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.04226.x ↗
11. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2015 · 106 · 26290110.1063/1.4923373 ↗
12. J. Appl. Phys. · 2016 · 120 · 07410710.1063/1.4961329 ↗
13. J. Appl. Phys. · 2016 · 120 · 14410210.1063/1.4964736 ↗
14. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1989 · 72 · 57110.1111/j.1151-2916.1989.tb06177.x ↗
15. J. Appl. Phys. · 1989 · 66 · 601410.1063/1.343578 ↗
16. Prog. Mater. Sci. · 2014 · 63 · 110.1016/j.pmatsci.2014.01.002 ↗
17. Materials · 2015 · 8 · 543910.3390/ma8125439 ↗