Pulse discharge properties of PLZST antiferroelectric ceramics compared with ferroelectric and linear dielectrics
Source abstract
Abstract
The pulse discharge properties of lead lanthanum zirconate stannate titanate (PLZST) antiferroelectric (AFE) ceramics, ferroelectric (FE) dielectrics, and linear dielectrics were compared in this paper. It is found that as the voltage increases, those three types of dielectrics display three different voltage-dependent regularities: the peak current (Imax) of linear dielectrics increases linearly with increasing voltage; the Imax of FE dielectrics rises up with a gradually declined increase rate; the Imax of PLZST AFE ceramics presents a three-stage growth and during the third stage, the regularity is similar with that of FE dielectrics. Furthermore, three advantages of PLZST AFE ceramics for pulse discharge can be determined: a large increase rate of Imax due the field-forced AFE-FE phase transition, a great enhanced power density and a relatively short discharge period time. These results would pave the way for understanding and utilizing AFE ceramics in pulse power application.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Dielectric materials and actuators · Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Key Laboratory of Inorganic Functional Materials and Devices, Shanghai Institute of Ceramics, Chinese Academy of Sciences 1 , 1295 Dingxi Road, Shanghai 200050, People’s Republic of China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences 2 , Beijing 100049, P. R. China
Funding
Shanghai Sailing Program · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2001 · 37 · 32410.1109/20.911847 ↗
2. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2001 · 37 · 33210.1109/20.911849 ↗
3. Proc IRE · 1961 · 49 · 126410.1109/jrproc.1961.287917 ↗
4. J. Appl. Phys. · 2016 · 119 · 02410410.1063/1.4939617 ↗
5. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2016 · 99 · 356910.1111/jace.14406 ↗
6. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2016 · 99 · 385310.1111/jace.14592 ↗
7. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2016 · 109 · 26290110.1063/1.4973425 ↗
8. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2016 · 99 · 290910.1111/jace.14446 ↗
9. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2005 · 41 · 28110.1109/tmag.2004.839281 ↗
10. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2010 · 93 · 401510.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.04226.x ↗
11. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2015 · 106 · 26290110.1063/1.4923373 ↗
12. J. Appl. Phys. · 2016 · 120 · 07410710.1063/1.4961329 ↗
13. J. Appl. Phys. · 2016 · 120 · 14410210.1063/1.4964736 ↗
14. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1989 · 72 · 57110.1111/j.1151-2916.1989.tb06177.x ↗
15. J. Appl. Phys. · 1989 · 66 · 601410.1063/1.343578 ↗
16. Prog. Mater. Sci. · 2014 · 63 · 110.1016/j.pmatsci.2014.01.002 ↗
17. Materials · 2015 · 8 · 543910.3390/ma8125439 ↗