journal article·2016-01-01Open access

Measurements of the linewidth enhancement factor of mid-infrared quantum cascade lasers by different optical feedback techniques

L. Jumpertz, F. Michel, R. Pawlus, W. Elsässer, K. Schires, M. Carras, F. Grillot

AIP Advances· Volume 6· Issue 1

Abstract

Precise knowledge of the linewidth enhancement factor of a semiconductor laser under actual operating conditions is of prime importance since this parameter dictates various phenomena such as linewidth broadening or optical nonlinearities enhancement. The above-threshold linewidth enhancement factor of a mid-infrared quantum cascade laser structure operated at 10∘C is determined experimentally using two different methods based on optical feedback. Both Fabry-Perot and distributed feedback quantum cascade lasers based on the same active area design are studied, the former by following the wavelength shift as a function of the feedback strength and the latter by self-mixing interferometry. The results are consistent and unveil a clear pump current dependence of the linewidth enhancement factor, with values ranging from 0.8 to about 3.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices · Spectroscopy and Laser Applications · Photonic and Optical Devices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Université Paris-Saclay, Télécom ParisTech, CNRS LTCI 1 , 46 rue Barrault, F-75013 Paris, France

MirSense 2 , 8 avenue de la Vauve, F-91120 Palaiseau, France

Technische Universität Darmstadt 3 , Schlossgartenstr. 7, D-64289 Darmstadt, Germany

University of New-Mexico 4 also with Center for High Technology Materials, , 1313 Goddard SE, Albuquerque, NM, United States

Funding

Direction Générale de l'Armement

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Science · 1994 · 264 · 55310.1126/science.264.5158.553 ↗
2. Measurement Science and Technology · 2014 · 25 · 1200110.1088/0957-0233/25/1/012001 ↗
3. Opt. Lett. · 2013 · 38 · 197510.1364/OL.38.001975 ↗
4. Applied Physics Letters · 2014 · 105 · 13111210.1063/1.4897274 ↗
5. Laser & Photonics Reviews · 2014 · 8 · 44310.1002/lpor.201300189 ↗
6. IEEE J. Quantum Elect. · 1982 · 18 · 25910.1109/JQE.1982.1071522 ↗
7. Z. Phys. · 1967 · 204 · 26210.1007/BF01326200 ↗
8. IEEE J. Quantum Elect. · 1996 · 32 · 59010.1109/3.488831 ↗
9. IEEE J. Quantum Elect. · 1987 · 23 · 910.1109/JQE.1987.1073204 ↗
10. J. Appl. Phys. · 1975 · 46 · 129910.1063/1.321696 ↗
11. Electron. Lett. · 1983 · 19 · 92710.1049/el:19830633 ↗
12. IEEE Photon. J. · 2011 · 3 · 47610.1109/JPHOT.2011.2148194 ↗
13. 2013
14. J. Appl. Phys. · 2003 · 94 · 542610.1063/1.1611285 ↗
15. IEEE J. Quantum Elect. · 2004 · 40 · 166310.1109/JQE.2004.837666 ↗
16. Opt. Express · 2013 · 21 · 2780410.1364/OE.21.027804 ↗
17. Opt. Lett. · 2006 · 31 · 257410.1364/OL.31.002574 ↗
18. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 89 · 09112110.1063/1.2345035 ↗
19. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quant. · 2015 · 21 · 120041110.1109/JSTQE.2015.2422073 ↗
20. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2004 · 84 · 31410.1063/1.1641174 ↗
21. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 96 · 16110510.1063/1.3399779 ↗
22. IEEE J. Quantum Elect. · 1988 · 24 · 124210.1109/3.960 ↗
23. IEEE J. Quantum Elect. · 2004 · 4 · 23110.1109/JQE.2003.823031 ↗
24. Opt. Express · 2014 · 22 · 565110.1364/OE.22.005651 ↗
25. Opt. Express · 2014 · 22 · 722210.1364/OE.22.007222 ↗
26. J. Appl. Phys. · 1978 · 49 · 49510.1063/1.324672 ↗
27. J. Opt. A : Pure Appl. Opt. · 2002 · 4 · 28310.1088/1464-4258/4/6/371 ↗
28. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. · 2004 · 16 · 99010.1109/LPT.2004.824631 ↗
29. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. · 1989 · 1 · 21210.1109/68.36045 ↗
30. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 105 · 10310610.1063/1.4895123 ↗
31. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. · 1996 · 8 · 33410.1109/68.481108 ↗
32. IEEE J. Quantum Elect. · 2008 · 44 · 94610.1109/JQE.2008.2003106 ↗