Decoupling Intrinsic Molecular Efficacy From Platform Effects: An Interpretable Machine Learning Framework for Unbiased Perovskite Passivator Discovery
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT Rational design of interface passivators for perovskite solar cells is hindered by the entanglement of intrinsic molecular efficacy with extrinsic platform‐dependent performance—a confounding factor that obscures true chemical advances. Here, we present a generalizable, interpretable machine learning framework that decouples these effects via an asymptotic saturation model, enabling unbiased discovery of molecules with genuine intrinsic gains. Trained on a curated dataset of 240 experimental entries, our model identifies hydrogen bond acceptor strength and electrostatic potential difference as key descriptors. Guided by these insights, we screened >121 million PubChem compounds using a hierarchical strategy integrating diversity clustering and uncertainty quantification. Five dual‐functional candidates (e.g., TDZ‐S, TZC‐F) are identified, exhibiting superior predicted efficacy (surpassing experimental benchmarks) and high confidence. First‐principles calculations confirm strong chemisorption (E ads <−1.7 eV), net electron donation, and optimized interfacial energetics. Crucially, our closed‐loop “data–interpretation–screening–verification” pipeline establishes a transferable paradigm for rational materials design, extendable to other optoelectronic interfaces beyond perovskites.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Perovskite Materials and Applications · Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Physical Science and Technology Ningbo University Ningbo China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (93)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/advs.20160026910.1002/advs.201600269 ↗
2. 10.1002/smll.20240954610.1002/smll.202409546 ↗
3. 10.1002/adma.20221212610.1002/adma.202212126 ↗
4. 10.1002/ange.20191570210.1002/ange.201915702 ↗
5. 10.1126/science.adw878010.1126/science.adw8780 ↗
6. 10.1002/aenm.20210403010.1002/aenm.202104030 ↗
7. 10.1002/admi.20210213710.1002/admi.202102137 ↗
8. 10.1038/s41560‐018‐0192‐210.1038/s41560‐018‐0192‐2 ↗
9. 10.1038/s41560‐019‐0382‐610.1038/s41560‐019‐0382‐6 ↗
10. 10.1039/D0TA08656H10.1039/D0TA08656H ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b0096310.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00963 ↗
12. 10.1002/adma.20190372110.1002/adma.201903721 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41566‐021‐00829‐410.1038/s41566‐021‐00829‐4 ↗
14. 10.1038/s41467‐025‐55815‐z10.1038/s41467‐025‐55815‐z ↗
15. 10.1038/s41560‐023‐01362‐010.1038/s41560‐023‐01362‐0 ↗
16. 10.1126/science.aax329410.1126/science.aax3294 ↗
17. 10.1039/C7TA11280G10.1039/C7TA11280G ↗
18. 10.1126/science.adr209110.1126/science.adr2091 ↗
19. 10.1002/anie.20220130010.1002/anie.202201300 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.matt.2022.04.00610.1016/j.matt.2022.04.006 ↗
21. 10.1039/D2TA08878A10.1039/D2TA08878A ↗
22. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.14210.1038/nenergy.2016.142 ↗
23. 10.1038/s41467‐019‐08455‐z10.1038/s41467‐019‐08455‐z ↗
24. 10.1038/nature2598910.1038/nature25989 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.cej.2025.16569510.1016/j.cej.2025.165695 ↗
26. 10.1039/D3TA03423B10.1039/D3TA03423B ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5c0386010.1021/acs.nanolett.5c03860 ↗
28. 10.1039/D5EE00524H10.1039/D5EE00524H ↗
29. 10.1002/adfm.20251045810.1002/adfm.202510458 ↗
30. 10.1063/5.028185510.1063/5.0281855 ↗
31. 10.1038/s41524‐021‐00494‐910.1038/s41524‐021‐00494‐9 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.physrep.2021.08.00210.1016/j.physrep.2021.08.002 ↗
33. 10.1021/acsami.1c1847710.1021/acsami.1c18477 ↗
34. 10.1039/D5EL00041F10.1039/D5EL00041F ↗
35. 10.1016/j.cej.2025.16570410.1016/j.cej.2025.165704 ↗
36. 10.1002/advs.20210364810.1002/advs.202103648 ↗
37. 10.1002/adfm.20231452910.1002/adfm.202314529 ↗
38. 10.1002/adfm.20251154910.1002/adfm.202511549 ↗
39. 10.1002/adfm.20250667210.1002/adfm.202506672 ↗
40. 10.1021/acsenergylett.4c0261010.1021/acsenergylett.4c02610 ↗
41. 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c0281810.1021/acsenergylett.2c02818 ↗
42. 10.1002/adfm.20251154910.1002/adfm.202511549 ↗
43. 10.1088/2632‐2153/ad7d5e10.1088/2632‐2153/ad7d5e ↗
44. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c0220110.1021/acs.jpclett.0c02201 ↗
45. 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c0112710.1021/acs.jcim.0c01127 ↗
46. 10.3390/ijms2304215610.3390/ijms23042156 ↗
47. 10.1021/accountsmr.1c0024410.1021/accountsmr.1c00244 ↗
48. 10.1007/s10115‐013‐0679‐x10.1007/s10115‐013‐0679‐x ↗
49. 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.3c0027510.1021/acsmaterialslett.3c00275 ↗
50. 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c0152210.1021/acsenergylett.3c01522 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.cej.2025.16196710.1016/j.cej.2025.161967 ↗
52. 10.1021/ci00001a01210.1021/ci00001a012 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.cej.2025.16740110.1016/j.cej.2025.167401 ↗
54. 10.1038/s41566‐023‐01180‐610.1038/s41566‐023‐01180‐6 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.15026710.1016/j.apsusc.2021.150267 ↗
56. 10.1007/s10854‐025‐14240‐010.1007/s10854‐025‐14240‐0 ↗
57. 10.20517/jmi.2024.6110.20517/jmi.2024.61 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.jmgm.2025.10907810.1016/j.jmgm.2025.109078 ↗
59. 10.1002/adma.20241330410.1002/adma.202413304 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.neucom.2017.11.07710.1016/j.neucom.2017.11.077 ↗
61. 10.1007/s40820‐023‐01131‐410.1007/s40820‐023‐01131‐4 ↗
62. 10.1038/s41524‐025‐01691‐610.1038/s41524‐025‐01691‐6 ↗
63. A.Shrivastava A.Gupta andR.Girshick “Training Region‐Based Object Detectors with Online Hard Example Mining ” paper presented at2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) Las Vegas NV USA June 27–30 2016 https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.89.10.1109/CVPR.2016.89 ↗
64. 10.1039/D5EL00163C10.1039/D5EL00163C ↗
65. 10.1016/j.jechem.2024.12.06710.1016/j.jechem.2024.12.067 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.mssp.2025.11027810.1016/j.mssp.2025.110278 ↗
67. 10.1038/s41560‐024‐01529‐310.1038/s41560‐024‐01529‐3 ↗
68. 10.1039/D1SC01171E10.1039/D1SC01171E ↗
69. 10.1039/D5SC06333G10.1039/D5SC06333G ↗
70. 10.1126/sciadv.aav069310.1126/sciadv.aav0693 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2025.11254810.1016/j.mtcomm.2025.112548 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.ssi.2021.11557110.1016/j.ssi.2021.115571 ↗
73. 10.1007/s10853‐020‐05685‐110.1007/s10853‐020‐05685‐1 ↗
74. 10.1021/acsami.4c0476210.1021/acsami.4c04762 ↗
75. 10.1021/acsami.5c0058110.1021/acsami.5c00581 ↗
76. 10.3390/ma1623730610.3390/ma16237306 ↗
77. 10.1021/jacs.3c0932710.1021/jacs.3c09327 ↗
78. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2023.10873110.1016/j.nanoen.2023.108731 ↗
79. 10.1016/j.joule.2024.01.02010.1016/j.joule.2024.01.020 ↗
80. 10.3390/ma1801017910.3390/ma18010179 ↗
81. 10.1016/j.solmat.2023.11249910.1016/j.solmat.2023.112499 ↗
82. 10.1021/acsami.2c0595610.1021/acsami.2c05956 ↗
83. 10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.01910.1016/j.addr.2012.09.019 ↗
84. 10.1021/ci100050t10.1021/ci100050t ↗
85. 10.1021/ci980338110.1021/ci9803381 ↗
86. 10.3389/fchem.2024.138231910.3389/fchem.2024.1382319 ↗
87. Visualizing High‐Dimensional Data Using T‐SNE
88. 10.1016/j.rineng.2025.10876710.1016/j.rineng.2025.108767 ↗
89. 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c0050210.1021/acs.jcim.0c00502 ↗
90. Quantile Regression Forests
91. 10.1038/s41467‐024‐54925‐410.1038/s41467‐024‐54925‐4 ↗
92. 10.1021/jacs.1c0512210.1021/jacs.1c05122 ↗
93. 10.1002/adom.20220242810.1002/adom.202202428 ↗