journal article·2023-09Open access

Unveiling the Fatigue Behavior of 2D Hybrid Organic–Inorganic Perovskites: Insights for Long‐Term Durability

Doyun Kim, Eugenia S. Vasileiadou, Ioannis Spanopoulos, Xuguang Wang, Jinhui Yan, Mercouri G. Kanatzidis, Qing Tu

Advanced Science· Volume 10· Issue 26

Abstract

Abstract 2D hybrid organic–inorganic perovskites (HOIPs) are commonly found under subcritical cyclic stresses and suffer from fatigue issues during device operation. However, their fatigue properties remain unknown. Here, the fatigue behavior of (C4H9‐NH3)2(CH3NH3)2Pb3I10, the archetype 2D HOIP, is systematically investigated by atomic force microscopy (AFM). It is found that 2D HOIPs are much more fatigue resilient than polymers and can survive over 1 billion cycles. 2D HOIPs tend to exhibit brittle failure at high mean stress levels, but behave as ductile materials at low mean stress levels. These results suggest the presence of a plastic deformation mechanism in these ionic 2D HOIPs at low mean stress levels, which may contribute to the long fatigue lifetime, but is inhibited at higher mean stresses. The stiffness and strength of 2D HOIPs are gradually weakened under subcritical loading, potentially as a result of stress‐induced defect nucleation and accumulation. The cyclic loading component can further accelerate this process. The fatigue lifetime of 2D HOIPs can be extended by reducing the mean stress, stress amplitude, or increasing the thickness. These results can provide indispensable insights into designing and engineering 2D HOIPs and other hybrid organic–inorganic materials for long‐term mechanical durability.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Conducting polymers and applications · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Science & Engineering Texas A&M University College Station TX 77840 USA

Department of Chemistry Northwestern University Evanston IL 60201 USA

Department of Chemistry University of South Florida Tampa FL 33620 USA

Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering University of Illinois Urbana‐Champaign Urbana IL 61801‐2352 USA

Funding

University of South Florida · National Science Foundation

References (64)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adma.20160026510.1002/adma.201600265 ↗
2. 10.1038/s41565-020-00811-110.1038/s41565-020-00811-1 ↗
3. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Best Research‐Cell Efficiency Chart2023.
4. 10.1038/s41586-021-03285-w10.1038/s41586-021-03285-w ↗
5. 10.1038/nnano.2016.11010.1038/nnano.2016.110 ↗
6. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c0040410.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00404 ↗
7. 10.1002/smll.20170210710.1002/smll.201702107 ↗
8. 10.1126/science.286.5441.94510.1126/science.286.5441.945 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.matt.2021.06.02810.1016/j.matt.2021.06.028 ↗
10. 10.1002/aesr.20220013310.1002/aesr.202200133 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.nantod.2021.10115510.1016/j.nantod.2021.101155 ↗
12. 10.1093/nsr/nwab12910.1093/nsr/nwab129 ↗
13. 10.1021/jacs.8b1085110.1021/jacs.8b10851 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0562310.1021/acsnano.8b05623 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsami.8b0513810.1021/acsami.8b05138 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsami.0c0231310.1021/acsami.0c02313 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsami.1c0614010.1021/acsami.1c06140 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b0012010.1021/acsenergylett.9b00120 ↗
19. 10.1126/sciadv.aao561610.1126/sciadv.aao5616 ↗
20. 10.1038/s41586-019-1868-x10.1038/s41586-019-1868-x ↗
21. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.02.02210.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.02.022 ↗
22. 10.1002/solr.20180031710.1002/solr.201800317 ↗
23. 10.1002/solr.20200067210.1002/solr.202000672 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.0c0030810.1021/acsmaterialslett.0c00308 ↗
25. 10.1017/CBO978051180657510.1017/CBO9780511806575 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.mser.2020.10054510.1016/j.mser.2020.100545 ↗
27. 10.1038/nnano.2008.9610.1038/nnano.2008.96 ↗
28. 10.1002/adma.20130356910.1002/adma.201303569 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsami.7b0965210.1021/acsami.7b09652 ↗
30. 10.1038/s41563-019-0586-y10.1038/s41563-019-0586-y ↗
31. 10.1016/j.matt.2022.06.01410.1016/j.matt.2022.06.014 ↗
32. 10.1126/sciadv.abj699610.1126/sciadv.abj6996 ↗
33. 10.1126/science.aay522010.1126/science.aay5220 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jmps.2022.10490710.1016/j.jmps.2022.104907 ↗
35. 10.1016/S0924-4247(02)00268-610.1016/S0924-4247(02)00268-6 ↗
36. 10.1063/5.006046510.1063/5.0060465 ↗
37. 10.1039/C9EE03757H10.1039/C9EE03757H ↗
38. 10.1021/acsami.2c1778310.1021/acsami.2c17783 ↗
39. 10.1109/JMEMS.2008.200858310.1109/JMEMS.2008.2008583 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.carbon.2021.07.06210.1016/j.carbon.2021.07.062 ↗
41. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c0386810.1021/acs.nanolett.0c03868 ↗
42. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b0033610.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00336 ↗
43. 10.1039/C8TA06950F10.1039/C8TA06950F ↗
44. 10.1557/mrs.2017.310.1557/mrs.2017.3 ↗
45. 10.1016/B0-08-043749-4/04067-210.1016/B0-08-043749-4/04067-2 ↗
46. 10.1007/BF0226521510.1007/BF02265215 ↗
47. 10.1002/adma.20220530110.1002/adma.202205301 ↗
48. 10.1002/adma.20160655610.1002/adma.201606556 ↗
49. 10.1126/science.115799610.1126/science.1157996 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.matdes.2007.05.00510.1016/j.matdes.2007.05.005 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.08.01710.1016/j.compositesb.2012.08.017 ↗
52. 10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2007)20:2(97)10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2007)20:2(97) ↗
53. 10.1038/s41598-017-09843-510.1038/s41598-017-09843-5 ↗
54. 10.1038/ncomms1581510.1038/ncomms15815 ↗
55. 10.1021/nl504206610.1021/nl5042066 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.eml.2016.11.00110.1016/j.eml.2016.11.001 ↗
57. 10.1088/1361-6528/ab3cd310.1088/1361-6528/ab3cd3 ↗
58. 10.1038/ncomms902910.1038/ncomms9029 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.04.07410.1016/j.carbon.2018.04.074 ↗
60. 10.1126/sciadv.aao720210.1126/sciadv.aao7202 ↗
61. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0084710.1021/acs.chemmater.6b00847 ↗
62. 10.1039/c0cs00163e10.1039/c0cs00163e ↗
63. 10.1063/1.114717710.1063/1.1147177 ↗
64. 10.1063/1.114397010.1063/1.1143970 ↗