Monolithic 3D Oscillatory Ising Machine Using Reconfigurable FeFET Routing for Large‐Scalability and Low‐Power Consumption
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Ising machines are attractive for efficiently solving NP‐hard combinatorial optimization problems (COPs). In this work, a scalable monolithic‐3D (M3D) oscillatory Ising machine (OIM) is proposed using ferroelectric field‐effect transistors (FeFETs) serving as an in‐memory routing switch (RS) and bi‐stable resistor (biristor)‐based oscillators for the first time. The M3D OIM achieves low static power consumption while offering high reconfigurability. Through careful control of FeFET routing switches, weights of the Ising model are embedded in coupled biristors. The performance is validated through simulations and experiments, in successfully solving King's graph sub‐problems and the MaxCUT problem. By leveraging the intrinsic OIM features of parallel computing together with M3D integration, it is reported that the M3D OIM outperforms reported OIMs in scalability and speed. Such an approach provides new insights and significant potential for solving COPs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices · Advanced Memory and Neural Computing · Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Electrical Engineering Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST) 291 Daehak‐ro Yuseong‐gu Daejeon 34141 Republic of Korea
School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering Eindhoven Technical University Eindhoven AZ 5612 The Netherlands
Device Technology Division Korea Advanced Nano Fab Center (KANC) 109 Gwanggyo‐ro Yeongtong‐gu Suwon 16229 Republic of Korea
Funding
National Research Foundation of Korea · National Research Council of Science and Technology · IC Design Education Center
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.3389/fphy.2014.0000510.3389/fphy.2014.00005 ↗
2. 10.1038/s42005-021-00792-010.1038/s42005-021-00792-0 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.vlsi.2019.07.00310.1016/j.vlsi.2019.07.003 ↗
4. 10.7566/JPSJ.88.06101010.7566/JPSJ.88.061010 ↗
5. 10.1038/s42254-022-00440-810.1038/s42254-022-00440-8 ↗
6. 10.1145/3149526.314953110.1145/3149526.3149531 ↗
7. 10.3389/fphy.2014.0005610.3389/fphy.2014.00056 ↗
8. 10.1038/s41567-022-01741-610.1038/s41567-022-01741-6 ↗
9. 10.1126/science.aah424310.1126/science.aah4243 ↗
10. 10.1126/sciadv.aau082310.1126/sciadv.aau0823 ↗
11. 10.1126/sciadv.abh095210.1126/sciadv.abh0952 ↗
12. 10.1109/JSSC.2019.294923010.1109/JSSC.2019.2949230 ↗
13. Yamaoka M. · IEEE J. Solid‐State Circuits · 2015 · 51 · 303
14. T.Okuyama C.Yoshimura M.Hayashi M.Yamaoka in2016 IEEE international conference on rebooting computing (ICRC) IEEE San Diego CA USA2016 1‐8.10.1109/ICRC.2016.7738673 ↗
15. T.Wang J.Roychowdhury in18th International Conference Unconventional Computation and Natural Computation: UCNC Springer Tokyo Japan2019 232‐256.10.1007/978-3-030-19311-9_19 ↗
16. A.Neogy J.Roychowdhury in2012 Design Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE)IEEE Dresden Germany2012 1209‐1214.10.1109/DATE.2012.6176677 ↗
17. 10.1038/s41598-023-28217-810.1038/s41598-023-28217-8 ↗
18. a)A.Mallick M.Bashar D.Truesdell B.Calhoun N.Shukla in2021 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) IEEE San Francisco CA USA2021 40.2. 1‐40.2. 4;10.1109/IEDM19574.2021.9720612 ↗
19. 10.1109/JSSC.2021.306282110.1109/JSSC.2021.3062821 ↗
20. 10.1038/s41928-021-00616-710.1038/s41928-021-00616-7 ↗
21. 10.1007/s00500-020-05502-610.1007/s00500-020-05502-6 ↗
22. M.Graber M.Wesp K.Hofmann in2022 Austrochip Workshop on Microelectronics (Austrochip) IEEE IEEE Villach Austria2022 41‐44.10.1109/Austrochip56145.2022.9940722 ↗
23. 10.1002/aelm.20230032710.1002/aelm.202300327 ↗
24. 10.1109/TED.2022.315468710.1109/TED.2022.3154687 ↗
25. 10.1109/JXCDC.2019.293028410.1109/JXCDC.2019.2930284 ↗
26. J. P.Kim H. W.Kim J.Jeong J.Park S. K.Kim J.Kim J.Woo S.Kim in2023 International Electron Devices Meeting IEEE San Francisco CA USA2023 1‐4.10.1109/IEDM45741.2023.10413826 ↗
27. 10.1109/LED.2022.320443610.1109/LED.2022.3204436 ↗
28. 10.1002/adfm.20230793510.1002/adfm.202307935 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevE.88.06291110.1103/PhysRevE.88.062911 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.490678310.1063/1.4906783 ↗
31. 10.1038/s41467-024-47642-510.1038/s41467-024-47642-5 ↗
32. 10.1007/978-3-540-68279-0_810.1007/978-3-540-68279-0_8 ↗
33. Wiegele A. · Preprint · 2007 · 51 · 112
34. S.Subramanian M.Hosseini T.Chiarella S.Sarkar P.Schuddinck B.Chan D.Radisic G.Mannaert A.Hikavyy E.Rosseel in2020 IEEE Symp. Vlsi Technol. IEEE Honolulu HI USA 2020 1‐2.
35. 10.1186/s40580-024-00429-210.1186/s40580-024-00429-2 ↗
36. 10.1109/JETCAS.2023.332888710.1109/JETCAS.2023.3328887 ↗
37. 10.1038/s41928-022-00749-310.1038/s41928-022-00749-3 ↗
38. 10.1038/s41467-023-41647-210.1038/s41467-023-41647-2 ↗
39. 10.1002/advs.20231009610.1002/advs.202310096 ↗