journal article·2025-09Open access

Quantum Kernel Learning for Small Dataset Modeling in Semiconductor Fabrication: Application to Ohmic Contact

Zeheng Wang, Fangzhou Wang, Liang Li, Zirui Wang, Timothy van der Laan, Ross C. C. Leon, Jing‐Kai Huang, Muhammad Usman

Advanced Science· Volume 12· Issue 35

Abstract

Abstract Modeling complex semiconductor fabrication processes such as Ohmic contact formation remains challenging due to high‐dimensional parameter spaces and limited experimental data. While classical machine learning (CML) approaches have been successful in many domains, their performance degrades in small‐sample, nonlinear scenarios. In this work, quantum machine learning (QML) is investigated as an alternative, exploiting quantum kernels to capture intricate correlations from compact datasets. Using only 159 experimental GaN HEMT samples, a quantum kernel‐aligned regressor (QKAR) is developed combining a shallow Pauli‐Z feature map with a trainable quantum kernel alignment (QKA) layer. All models, including seven baseline CML regressors, are evaluated under a unified PCA‐based preprocessing pipeline to ensure a fair comparison. QKAR consistently outperforms classical baselines across multiple metrics (MAE, MSE, RMSE), achieving a mean absolute error of 0.338 Ω·mm when validated on experimental data. Noise robustness and generalization are further assessed through cross‐validation and new device fabrication. These findings suggest that carefully constructed QML models can provide predictive advantages in data‐constrained semiconductor modeling, offering a foundation for practical deployment on near‐term quantum hardware. While challenges remain for both QML and CML, this study demonstrates QML's potential as a complementary approach in complex process modeling tasks.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices · Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Data61 CSIRO Clayton Melbourn VIC 3168 Australia

Manufacturing CSIRO West Lindfield Sydney NSW 2070 Australia

Songshan Lake Materials Laboratory Dongguan 523808 China

Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies Peking University Beijing 100871 China

School of Integrated Circuits Peking University Beijing 100871 China

Quantum Motion Ltd London N7 9HJ United Kingdom

Department of Systems Engineering City University of Hong Kong Hong Kong 999077 China

School of Physics The University of Melbourne Parkville VIC 3010 Australia

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/TED.2021.309384410.1109/TED.2021.3093844 ↗
2. 10.1109/TED.2020.303263410.1109/TED.2020.3032634 ↗
3. 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.301447010.1109/ACCESS.2020.3014470 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.sse.2022.10846810.1016/j.sse.2022.108468 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.sse.2024.10898810.1016/j.sse.2024.108988 ↗
6. 10.1109/TED.2023.330705110.1109/TED.2023.3307051 ↗
7. 10.1109/TED.2021.306321310.1109/TED.2021.3063213 ↗
8. Bishop C. M. · 2016
9. 10.1038/nature2347410.1038/nature23474 ↗
10. 10.1038/s43588-022-00311-310.1038/s43588-022-00311-3 ↗
11. 10.1038/s41467-022-32550-310.1038/s41467-022-32550-3 ↗
12. 10.1109/JSTARS.2023.331630610.1109/JSTARS.2023.3316306 ↗
13. 10.1002/qute.20230045010.1002/qute.202300450 ↗
14. 10.1038/s41567-023-02340-910.1038/s41567-023-02340-9 ↗
15. 10.1002/advs.20241157310.1002/advs.202411573 ↗
16. Schuld M. · arXiv · 2021
17. Tomono T. · arXiv · 2024
18. K.Tscharke S.Issel P.Debus presented at2024 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) IEEE Montreal QC Canada September2024.
19. Dowling N. · arXiv · 2024
20. 10.1038/s42256-023-00661-110.1038/s42256-023-00661-1 ↗
21. 10.1038/s41586-019-0980-210.1038/s41586-019-0980-2 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.23510.1016/j.procs.2023.01.235 ↗
23. 10.1007/s10916-024-02048-010.1007/s10916-024-02048-0 ↗
24. A.Daspal presented at2023 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) IEEE Bellevue WA USA September2023.
25. Creevey F. M. · arXiv · 2023
26. 10.1038/s42254-025-00813-910.1038/s42254-025-00813-9 ↗
27. Tomasi J. · arXiv · 2025
28. 10.1038/s41928-019-0234-110.1038/s41928-019-0234-1 ↗
29. 10.1038/s41586-024-07107-710.1038/s41586-024-07107-7 ↗
30. 10.1103/RevModPhys.95.04500510.1103/RevModPhys.95.045005 ↗
31. 10.1109/TED.2019.289975610.1109/TED.2019.2899756 ↗
32. 10.3390/mi1503033010.3390/mi15030330 ↗
33. 10.1049/mnl.2017.005710.1049/mnl.2017.0057 ↗
34. 10.1007/s10825-019-01383-710.1007/s10825-019-01383-7 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.spmi.2018.03.06310.1016/j.spmi.2018.03.063 ↗
36. 10.1109/TED.2019.289975610.1109/TED.2019.2899756 ↗
37. 10.1002/aelm.20200104510.1002/aelm.202001045 ↗
38. 10.3390/mi1207073710.3390/mi12070737 ↗
39. 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.334881010.1109/ACCESS.2023.3348810 ↗
40. 10.1103/PhysRevA.106.04243110.1103/PhysRevA.106.042431 ↗
41. 10.1103/PRXQuantum.4.01032810.1103/PRXQuantum.4.010328 ↗
42. 10.1109/TETCI.2024.349999310.1109/TETCI.2024.3499993 ↗
43. Steinacker P. · arXiv · 2024
44. 10.1002/adma.20220855710.1002/adma.202208557 ↗
45. 10.1038/s41565-023-01596-910.1038/s41565-023-01596-9 ↗