journal article·2025-01Open access

Flux Synthesis of A‐site Disordered Perovskite La0.5M0.5TiO3 (M═Li, Na, K) Nanorods Tailored for Solid Composite Electrolytes

Tao Wang, Jiyoung Ock, X. Chelsea Chen, Fan Wang, Meijia Li, Matthew S. Chambers, Gabriel M. Veith, Lauren B. Shepard, Susan B. Sinnott, Albina Borisevich, Miaofang Chi, Amit Bhattacharya, Raphaële J. Clément, Alexei P Sokolov, Sheng Dai

Advanced Science· Volume 12· Issue 3

Abstract

Abstract Inorganic fillers play an important role in improving the ionic conductivity of solid composite electrolytes (SCEs) for Li‐ion batteries. Among inorganic fillers, perovskite‐type lithium lanthanum titanate (LLTO) stands out for its high bulk Li+ conductivity on the order of 10−3 S cm−1 at room temperature. According to a literature survey, the optimal LLTO filler should possess the following characteristics: i) a single‐crystal structure to minimize grain boundaries; ii) a small particle size to increase the filler/polymer interface area; iii) a 1D morphology for efficient interface channels; and iv) cubic symmetry to facilitate rapid bulk Li+ diffusion within the filler. However, the synthesis of single crystal, 1D LLTO nanomaterials with cubic symmetry is challenging. Herein, a flux strategy is developed to synthesize La0.5M0.5TiO3 (LMTO, M═Li, Na, and K) single‐crystal nanorods with an A‐site‐disordered, cubic perovskite phase. The flux media promotes the oriented growth of nanorods, prevents nanorods from sintering, and provides multiple alkali metal ion doping at M sites to stabilize the cubic phase. SCEs compositing the Li+‐conducting LMTO nanorods as fillers and poly[vinylene carbonate‐co‐lithium sulfonyl(trifluoromethane sulfonyl)imide methacrylate] matrix exhibit more than twice the conductivity of the neat polymer electrolyte (30.6 vs 14.0 µS cm−1 at 303 K).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Layered Double Hydroxides Synthesis and Applications · Thermal Expansion and Ionic Conductivity

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Chemical Sciences Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge TN 37831 USA

Department of Chemistry Institute for Advanced Materials and Manufacturing University of Tennessee Knoxville TN 37996 USA

Department of Materials Science and Engineering The Pennsylvania State University University Park PA 16802 USA

Department of Chemistry The Pennsylvania State University University Park PA 16802 USA

Institute for Computational and Data Sciences The Pennsylvania State University University Park PA 16802 USA

Materials Research Institute The Pennsylvania State University University Park PA 16802 USA

Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge Tennessee 37831 USA

Materials Department and Materials Research Laboratory University of California Santa Barbara CA 93106 USA

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41563-019-0431-310.1038/s41563-019-0431-3 ↗
2. 10.1039/c0cs00081g10.1039/c0cs00081g ↗
3. 10.1002/adma.20170570210.1002/adma.201705702 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0167-2738(01)00821-910.1016/S0167-2738(01)00821-9 ↗
5. 10.1021/cm030051610.1021/cm0300516 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ensm.2017.08.01510.1016/j.ensm.2017.08.015 ↗
7. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c0165510.1021/acs.nanolett.2c01655 ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.09430510.1103/PhysRevB.104.094305 ↗
9. 10.1038/2881810.1038/28818 ↗
10. 10.1002/adts.20190001510.1002/adts.201900015 ↗
11. 10.1002/anie.20221753810.1002/anie.202217538 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0114410.1021/acsenergylett.1c01144 ↗
13. 10.1021/acsami.9b1629410.1021/acsami.9b16294 ↗
14. 10.1038/s41467-022-31792-510.1038/s41467-022-31792-5 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ensm.2020.09.01610.1016/j.ensm.2020.09.016 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ensm.2021.01.00210.1016/j.ensm.2021.01.002 ↗
17. 10.1002/smll.20190281310.1002/smll.201902813 ↗
18. 10.3389/fchem.2023.119967710.3389/fchem.2023.1199677 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.11826510.1016/j.memsci.2020.118265 ↗
20. 10.1002/anie.20211422010.1002/anie.202114220 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2018.10.01410.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2018.10.014 ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0060010.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00600 ↗
23. 10.1038/nenergy.2017.3510.1038/nenergy.2017.35 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.10.00510.1016/j.electacta.2018.10.005 ↗
25. 10.1002/er.634710.1002/er.6347 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.22979610.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229796 ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.cgd.9b0082510.1021/acs.cgd.9b00825 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ssi.2009.08.00210.1016/j.ssi.2009.08.002 ↗
29. 10.1063/5.016131610.1063/5.0161316 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ssi.2019.03.01510.1016/j.ssi.2019.03.015 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.03.07410.1016/j.memsci.2019.03.074 ↗
32. 10.1016/S0167-2738(02)00142-X10.1016/S0167-2738(02)00142-X ↗
33. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.3c0192810.1021/acs.chemmater.3c01928 ↗
34. 10.1039/b614345h10.1039/b614345h ↗
35. 10.1002/aenm.20200120410.1002/aenm.202001204 ↗
36. 10.1039/a907147d10.1039/a907147d ↗
37. 10.1039/C5SC03521J10.1039/C5SC03521J ↗
38. 10.1021/ic900854x10.1021/ic900854x ↗
39. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.05.10510.1016/j.ceramint.2013.05.105 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jmst.2017.10.00510.1016/j.jmst.2017.10.005 ↗
41. 10.1007/s10971-016-4115-z10.1007/s10971-016-4115-z ↗
42. 10.1016/S1466-6049(99)00029-X10.1016/S1466-6049(99)00029-X ↗
43. 10.1002/adma.20180623610.1002/adma.201806236 ↗
44. 10.1039/C6TA03249D10.1039/C6TA03249D ↗
45. 10.1038/s41563-020-00816-010.1038/s41563-020-00816-0 ↗
46. 10.1007/s10853-020-04482-010.1007/s10853-020-04482-0 ↗
47. 10.1107/S002188980402255110.1107/S0021889804022551 ↗
48. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c0149010.1021/acs.chemmater.1c01490 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.23379810.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.233798 ↗
50. 10.1107/S056773947600155110.1107/S0567739476001551 ↗
51. 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.09430210.1103/PhysRevB.83.094302 ↗
52. 10.1021/acs.macromol.4c0061510.1021/acs.macromol.4c00615 ↗