A comparative study on surfactant cetyltrimethylammoniumbromide modified clay‐based poly(p‐anisidine) nanocomposites: Synthesis, characterization, optical and electrochemical properties
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The preparation of hybrid materials, namely poly(p‐anisidine)@Clay (poly(pAnis)@Clay) and poly(p‐anisidine)@cetyltrimethylammoniumbromide‐Clay (poly(pAnis)@CTAB‐Clay), prepared by oxidative polymerization process is presented. The formation of nanomaterials has been confirmed by XRF, XPS, FT‐IR, and UV–Vis spectroscopy. Interestingly, the study of the optical band gap energy (Eg) evince lowest value of 3.22 eV for poly(pAnis)@CTAB‐Clay compared to poly(pAnis)@Clay with 3.26 eV. XRD results demonstrate that the intercalation of the poly(pAnis) into the Clay was confirmed by the increased interlayer spacing, the exfoliation and intercalation forms were affirmed in the TEM images. In addition, the electrochemical behavior indicates that the prepared nanocomposites are electroactive. These results are heartening in respect with the objective to utilize them in the field of technology and research related to the photovoltaics application.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Conducting polymers and applications · Polymer Nanocomposite Synthesis and Irradiation · Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
LSTE Laboratory University of Mustapha Stambouli Mascara Mascara Algeria
Université de Saida, Dr. Moulay Tahar Saïda Algeria
Faculty of Science and Technology University of Mustapha Stambouli Mascara Mascara Algeria
CRAPC Bou Ismaïl Algeria
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jece.2019.10324310.1016/j.jece.2019.103243 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.12.09810.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.12.098 ↗
3. 10.1021/acsomega.0c0423810.1021/acsomega.0c04238 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jece.2020.10400010.1016/j.jece.2020.104000 ↗
5. 10.1007/s00289-019-03036-y10.1007/s00289-019-03036-y ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jiec.2018.08.00910.1016/j.jiec.2018.08.009 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jpcs.2018.02.00310.1016/j.jpcs.2018.02.003 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.cplett.2020.13709510.1016/j.cplett.2020.137095 ↗
9. 10.1007/s10904-020-01508-710.1007/s10904-020-01508-7 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.synthmet.2018.02.00810.1016/j.synthmet.2018.02.008 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.synthmet.2018.08.00710.1016/j.synthmet.2018.08.007 ↗
12. 10.1002/pc.2383710.1002/pc.23837 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.molstruc.2017.09.02110.1016/j.molstruc.2017.09.021 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jiec.2018.02.03310.1016/j.jiec.2018.02.033 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.tsf.2015.01.05510.1016/j.tsf.2015.01.055 ↗
16. 10.1007/s00396-016-3955-y10.1007/s00396-016-3955-y ↗
17. 10.1007/s10973-018-7347-z10.1007/s10973-018-7347-z ↗
18. 10.1016/j.molstruc.2019.03.10010.1016/j.molstruc.2019.03.100 ↗
19. 10.1007/s10904-016-0433-410.1007/s10904-016-0433-4 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0924-2031(97)00002-710.1016/S0924-2031(97)00002-7 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2005.10.01210.1016/j.eurpolymj.2005.10.012 ↗
22. Nalwa H. S. · 1997
23. 10.1016/S0032-3861(99)00531-510.1016/S0032-3861(99)00531-5 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.493485110.1063/1.4934851 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.saa.2004.05.00110.1016/j.saa.2004.05.001 ↗
26. 10.1557/opl.2012.72010.1557/opl.2012.720 ↗
27. 10.1039/C6RA27343B10.1039/C6RA27343B ↗
28. Bekhti M. A. · Polym Compos · 2020 · 1
29. 10.1007/s00396-020-04720-610.1007/s00396-020-04720-6 ↗
30. Hammadi F. Z. · J Inorg Organomet Polym Mater · 2020
31. 10.1021/ma991847m10.1021/ma991847m ↗
32. 10.1007/s10904-018-01058-z10.1007/s10904-018-01058-z ↗
33. 10.1016/j.snb.2004.12.01910.1016/j.snb.2004.12.019 ↗
34. 10.1016/S0167-2738(01)00748-210.1016/S0167-2738(01)00748-2 ↗
35. 10.1039/f1986820238510.1039/f19868202385 ↗