journal article·2021-04

A comparative study on surfactant cetyltrimethylammoniumbromide modified clay‐based poly(p‐anisidine) nanocomposites: Synthesis, characterization, optical and electrochemical properties

Nadia Boutaleb, Faiza Chouli, Abdelghani Benyoucef, Fatima Z. Zeggai, Khaldoun Bachari

Polymer Composites· Volume 42· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The preparation of hybrid materials, namely poly(p‐anisidine)@Clay (poly(pAnis)@Clay) and poly(p‐anisidine)@cetyltrimethylammoniumbromide‐Clay (poly(pAnis)@CTAB‐Clay), prepared by oxidative polymerization process is presented. The formation of nanomaterials has been confirmed by XRF, XPS, FT‐IR, and UV–Vis spectroscopy. Interestingly, the study of the optical band gap energy (Eg) evince lowest value of 3.22 eV for poly(pAnis)@CTAB‐Clay compared to poly(pAnis)@Clay with 3.26 eV. XRD results demonstrate that the intercalation of the poly(pAnis) into the Clay was confirmed by the increased interlayer spacing, the exfoliation and intercalation forms were affirmed in the TEM images. In addition, the electrochemical behavior indicates that the prepared nanocomposites are electroactive. These results are heartening in respect with the objective to utilize them in the field of technology and research related to the photovoltaics application.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Conducting polymers and applications · Polymer Nanocomposite Synthesis and Irradiation · Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

LSTE Laboratory University of Mustapha Stambouli Mascara Mascara Algeria

Université de Saida, Dr. Moulay Tahar Saïda Algeria

Faculty of Science and Technology University of Mustapha Stambouli Mascara Mascara Algeria

CRAPC Bou Ismaïl Algeria

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jece.2019.10324310.1016/j.jece.2019.103243 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.12.09810.1016/j.matchemphys.2018.12.098 ↗
3. 10.1021/acsomega.0c0423810.1021/acsomega.0c04238 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jece.2020.10400010.1016/j.jece.2020.104000 ↗
5. 10.1007/s00289-019-03036-y10.1007/s00289-019-03036-y ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jiec.2018.08.00910.1016/j.jiec.2018.08.009 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jpcs.2018.02.00310.1016/j.jpcs.2018.02.003 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.cplett.2020.13709510.1016/j.cplett.2020.137095 ↗
9. 10.1007/s10904-020-01508-710.1007/s10904-020-01508-7 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.synthmet.2018.02.00810.1016/j.synthmet.2018.02.008 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.synthmet.2018.08.00710.1016/j.synthmet.2018.08.007 ↗
12. 10.1002/pc.2383710.1002/pc.23837 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.molstruc.2017.09.02110.1016/j.molstruc.2017.09.021 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jiec.2018.02.03310.1016/j.jiec.2018.02.033 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.tsf.2015.01.05510.1016/j.tsf.2015.01.055 ↗
16. 10.1007/s00396-016-3955-y10.1007/s00396-016-3955-y ↗
17. 10.1007/s10973-018-7347-z10.1007/s10973-018-7347-z ↗
18. 10.1016/j.molstruc.2019.03.10010.1016/j.molstruc.2019.03.100 ↗
19. 10.1007/s10904-016-0433-410.1007/s10904-016-0433-4 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0924-2031(97)00002-710.1016/S0924-2031(97)00002-7 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2005.10.01210.1016/j.eurpolymj.2005.10.012 ↗
22. Nalwa H. S. · 1997
23. 10.1016/S0032-3861(99)00531-510.1016/S0032-3861(99)00531-5 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.493485110.1063/1.4934851 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.saa.2004.05.00110.1016/j.saa.2004.05.001 ↗
26. 10.1557/opl.2012.72010.1557/opl.2012.720 ↗
27. 10.1039/C6RA27343B10.1039/C6RA27343B ↗
28. Bekhti M. A. · Polym Compos · 2020 · 1
29. 10.1007/s00396-020-04720-610.1007/s00396-020-04720-6 ↗
30. Hammadi F. Z. · J Inorg Organomet Polym Mater · 2020
31. 10.1021/ma991847m10.1021/ma991847m ↗
32. 10.1007/s10904-018-01058-z10.1007/s10904-018-01058-z ↗
33. 10.1016/j.snb.2004.12.01910.1016/j.snb.2004.12.019 ↗
34. 10.1016/S0167-2738(01)00748-210.1016/S0167-2738(01)00748-2 ↗
35. 10.1039/f1986820238510.1039/f19868202385 ↗