Packing-induced selectivity switching in molecular nanoparticle photocatalysts for hydrogen and hydrogen peroxide production
Source abstract
Abstract
Molecular packing controls optoelectronic properties in organic molecular nanomaterials. Here we report a donor-acceptor organic molecule (2,6-bis(4-cyanophenyl)-4-(9-phenyl-9H-carbazol-3-yl)pyridine-3,5-dicarbonitrile) that exhibits two aggregate states in aqueous dispersions: amorphous nanospheres and ordered nanofibres with π-π molecular stacking. The nanofibres promote sacrificial photocatalytic H2 production (31.85 mmol g-1 h-1) while the nanospheres produce hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) (3.20 mmol g-1 h-1 in the presence of O2). This is the first example of an organic photocatalyst that can be directed to produce these two different solar fuels simply by changing the molecular packing. These different packings affect energy band levels, the extent of excited state delocalization, the excited state dynamics, charge transfer to O2 and the light absorption profile. We use a combination of structural and photophysical measurements to understand how this influences photocatalytic selectivity. This illustrates the potential to achieve multiple photocatalytic functionalities with a single organic molecule by engineering nanomorphology and solid-state packing.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. Weingarten, A. S. et al. Self-assembling hydrogel scaffolds for photocatalytic hydrogen production. Nat. Chem. 6, 964–970 (2014).10.1038/nchem.2075 ↗
2. Wagner, A., Sahm, C. D. & Reisner, E. Towards molecular understanding of local chemical environment effects in electro- and photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Nat. Catal. 3, 775–786 (2020).10.1038/s41929-020-00512-x ↗
3. Liu, D., Wang, J., Bai, X., Zong, R. & Zhu, Y. Self-assembled PDINH supramolecular system for photocatalysis under visible light. Adv. Mater. 28, 7284–7290 (2016).10.1002/adma.201601168 ↗
4. Shigemitsu, H. et al. Aggregation-induced photocatalytic activity and efficient photocatalytic hydrogen evolution of amphiphilic rhodamines in water. Chem. Sci. 11, 11843–11848 (2020).10.1039/D0SC04285D ↗
5. Giri, G. et al. Tuning charge transport in solution-sheared organic semiconductors using lattice strain. Nature 480, 504–508 (2011).10.1038/nature10683 ↗
6. Aida, T., Meijer, E. W. & Stupp, S. I. Functional supramolecular polymers. Science 335, 813–817 (2012).10.1126/science.1205962 ↗
7. Tantakitti, F. et al. Energy landscapes and functions of supramolecular systems. Nat. Mater. 15, 469–476 (2016).10.1038/nmat4538 ↗
8. Li, Q. & Li, Z. Molecular packing: another key point for the performance of organic and polymeric optoelectronic materials. Acc. Chem. Res. 53, 962–973 (2020).10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00060 ↗
9. Rivnay, J. et al. Large modulation of carrier transport by grain-boundary molecular packing and microstructure in organic thin films. Nat. Mater. 8, 952–958 (2009).10.1038/nmat2570 ↗
10. Mutai, T., Satou, H. & Araki, K. Reproducible on–off switching of solid-state luminescence by controlling molecular packing through heat-mode interconversion. Nat. Mater. 4, 685–687 (2005).10.1038/nmat1454 ↗
11. Coropceanu, V. et al. Charge transport in organic semiconductors. Chem. Rev. 107, 926–952 (2007).10.1021/cr050140x ↗
12. Kazantsev, R. V. et al. Crystal-phase transitions and photocatalysis in supramolecular scaffolds. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 6120–6127 (2017).10.1021/jacs.6b13156 ↗
13. McDowall, D. et al. Controlling photocatalytic activity by self-assembly—tuning perylene bisimide photocatalysts for the hydrogen evolution reaction. Adv. Energy Mater. 10, 2002469 (2020).10.1002/aenm.202002469 ↗
14. Weingarten, A. S. et al. Supramolecular packing controls H2 photocatalysis in chromophore amphiphile hydrogels. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 15241–15246 (2015).10.1021/jacs.5b10027 ↗
15. Korevaar, P. A. et al. Pathway complexity in supramolecular polymerization. Nature 481, 492–496 (2012).10.1038/nature10720 ↗
16. Ogi, S., Sugiyasu, K., Manna, S., Samitsu, S. & Takeuchi, M. Living supramolecular polymerization realized through a biomimetic approach. Nat. Chem. 6, 188–195 (2014).10.1038/nchem.1849 ↗
17. Kudo, A. & Miseki, Y. Heterogeneous photocatalyst materials for water splitting. Chem. Soc. Rev. 38, 253–278 (2009).10.1039/B800489G ↗
18. Zhang, G., Lan, Z. A. & Wang, X. Conjugated polymers: catalysts for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 15712–15727 (2016).10.1002/anie.201607375 ↗
19. Hou, H., Zeng, X. & Zhang, X. Production of hydrogen peroxide by photocatalytic processes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 17356–17376 (2020).10.1002/anie.201911609 ↗
20. Kosco, J. et al. Enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution from organic semiconductor heterojunction nanoparticles. Nat. Mater. 19, 559–565 (2020).10.1038/s41563-019-0591-1 ↗
21. Shiraishi, Y. et al. Resorcinol–formaldehyde resins as metal-free semiconductor photocatalysts for solar-to-hydrogen peroxide energy conversion. Nat. Mater. 18, 985–993 (2019).10.1038/s41563-019-0398-0 ↗
22. Lin, L. et al. Molecular-level insights on the reactive facet of carbon nitride single crystals photocatalysing overall water splitting. Nat. Catal. 3, 649–655 (2020).10.1038/s41929-020-0476-3 ↗
23. Benniston, A. C., Harriman, A., Lawrie, D. J. & Mayeux, A. The photophysical properties of a pyrene–thiophene–terpyridine conjugate and of its zinc(II) and ruthenium(II) complexes. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 6, 51–57 (2004).10.1039/B312286G ↗
24. Zhou, C. et al. Enhancing the electroluminescent efficiency of acridine-based donor–acceptor materials: quasi-equivalent hybridized local and charge-transfer state. J. Phys. Chem. C 122, 18376–18382 (2018).10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b07083 ↗
25. Dhara, A. et al. Zero-overlap fluorophores for fluorescent studies at any concentration. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 12167–12180 (2020).10.1021/jacs.0c02450 ↗
26. Guo, Y., Shi, W. & Zhu, Y. Internal electric field engineering for steering photogenerated charge separation and enhancing photoactivity. EcoMat 1, 1–20 (2019).
27. Schubert, S., Delaney, J. T. & Schubert, U. S. Nanoprecipitation and nanoformulation of polymers: from history to powerful possibilities beyond poly(lactic acid). Soft Matter 7, 1581–1588 (2011).10.1039/C0SM00862A ↗
28. Ramírez, C. L., Mangione, M. I., Bertolotti, S. G., Arbeloa, E. M. & Parise, A. R. A photophysical and spectroelectrochemical study on N-phenyl-carbazoles and their oxidized species. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 365, 199–207 (2018).10.1016/j.jphotochem.2018.07.039 ↗
29. Neelambra, A. U., Govind, C., Devassia, T. T., Somashekharappa, G. M. & Karunakaran, V. Direct evidence of solvent polarity governing the intramolecular charge and energy transfer: ultrafast relaxation dynamics of push–pull fluorene derivatives. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 21, 11087–11102 (2019).10.1039/C9CP00796B ↗
30. Wang, X. et al. Sulfone-containing covalent organic frameworks for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution from water. Nat. Chem. 10, 1180–1189 (2018).10.1038/s41557-018-0141-5 ↗
31. Maeda, K. et al. Photocatalytic activities of graphitic carbon nitride powder for water reduction and oxidation under visible light. J. Phys. Chem. C. 113, 4940–4947 (2009).10.1021/jp809119m ↗
32. Liu, L. et al. Linear conjugated polymers for solar-driven hydrogen peroxide production: the importance of catalyst stability. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 19287–19293 (2021).10.1021/jacs.1c09979 ↗
33. CrysAlisPRO, 2020 version (Oxford Diffraction/Agilent Technologies UK, 2020).
34. Sheldrick, G. M. A short history of SHELX. Acta Cryst. A6 4, 112–122 (2008).10.1107/S0108767307043930 ↗
35. Dolomanov, O. V., Bourhis, L. J., Gildea, R. J., Howard, J. A. K. & Puschmann, H. OLEX2: a complete structure solution, refinement and analysis program. J. Appl. Cryst. 42, 339–341 (2009).10.1107/S0021889808042726 ↗
36. Sheldrick, G. M. Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL. Acta Cryst. C7 1, 3–8 (2015).
37. Nowell, H., Barnett, S. A., Christensen, K. E., Teat, S. J. & Allan, D. R. I19, the small-molecule single-crystal diffraction beamline at Diamond Light Source. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 19, 435–441 (2012).10.1107/S0909049512008801 ↗
38. Allan, D. et al. Novel dual air-bearing fixed-χ diffractometer for small-molecule single-crystal X-ray diffraction on beamline I19 at Diamond Light Source. Crystals 7, 336 (2017).10.3390/cryst7110336 ↗
39. Coelho, A. A. TOPAS and TOPAS-Academic: an optimization program integrating computer algebra and crystallographic objects written in C++. J. Appl. Cryst. 51, 210–218 (2018).10.1107/S1600576718000183 ↗
40. Dollase, W. A. Correction of intensities for preferred orientation in powder diffractometry: application of the March model. J. Appl. Cryst. 19, 267–272 (1986).10.1107/S0021889886089458 ↗
41. Wei, Z. et al. Efficient visible-light-driven selective oxygen reduction to hydrogen peroxide by oxygen-enriched graphitic carbon nitride polymers. Energy Environ. Sci. 11, 2581–2589 (2018).10.1039/C8EE01316K ↗
42. Yanai, T., Tew, D. P. & Handy, N. C. A new hybrid exchange-correlation functional using the Coulomb-attenuating method (CAM-B3LYP). Chem. Phys. Lett. 393, 51–57 (2004).10.1016/j.cplett.2004.06.011 ↗
43. Lu, T. & Chen, F. Multiwfn: a multifunctional wavefunction analyzer. J. Comput. Chem. 33, 580–592 (2012).10.1002/jcc.22885 ↗
44. Liu, Z., Lu, T. & Chen, Q. An sp-hybridized all-carboatomic ring, cyclo[18]carbon: electronic structure, electronic spectrum, and optical nonlinearity. Carbon 165, 461–467 (2020).10.1016/j.carbon.2020.05.023 ↗
45. Frisch, M. J. et al. Gaussian 16, Revision C.01 (Gaussian, 2016).
46. Bannwarth, C. & Grimme, S. A simplified time-dependent density functional theory approach for electronic ultraviolet and circular dichroism spectra of very large molecules. Comput. Theor. Chem. 1040, 45–53 (2014).10.1016/j.comptc.2014.02.023 ↗
47. Hanwell, M. D. et al. Avogadro: an advanced semantic chemical editor, visualization, and analysis platform. J. Cheminform. 4, 1–17 (2012).10.1186/1758-2946-4-17 ↗