journal article·2023-02

Machine learning for nanoplasmonics

Jean-Francois Masson, John S. Biggins, Emilie Ringe

Nature Nanotechnology· Volume 18· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

Plasmonic nanomaterials have outstanding optoelectronic properties potentially enabling the next generation of catalysts, sensors, lasers and photothermal devices. Owing to optical and electron techniques, modern nanoplasmonics research generates large datasets characterizing features across length scales. Furthermore, optimizing syntheses leading to specific nanostructures requires time-consuming multiparametric approaches. These complex datasets and trial-and-error practices make nanoplasmonics research ripe for the application of machine learning (ML) and advanced data processing methods. ML algorithms capture relationships between synthesis, structure and performance in a way that far exceeds conventional simulation and theory approaches, enabling effective performance optimization. For example, neural networks can tailor the nanostructure morphology to target desired properties, identify synthetic conditions and extract quantitative information from complex data. Here we discuss the nascent field of ML for nanoplasmonics, describe the opportunities and limitations of ML in nanoplasmonic research, and conclude that ML is potentially transformative, especially if the community curates and shares its big data.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications · Machine Learning in Materials Science · Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Mayer, K. M. & Hafner, J. H. Localized surface plasmon resonance sensors. Chem. Rev. 111, 3828–3857 (2011).10.1021/cr100313v ↗
2. Langer, J. et al. Present and future of surface-enhanced Raman scattering. ACS Nano 14, 28–117 (2020).10.1021/acsnano.9b04224 ↗
3. Willets, K. A., Wilson, A. J., Sundaresan, V. & Joshi, P. B. Super-resolution imaging and plasmonics. Chem. Rev. 117, 7538–7582 (2017).10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00547 ↗
4. Brongersma, M. L., Halas, N. J. & Nordlander, P. Plasmon-induced hot carrier science and technology. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 25–34 (2015).10.1038/nnano.2014.311 ↗
5. Baffou, G. & Quidant, R. Nanoplasmonics for chemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 3898–3907 (2014).10.1039/c3cs60364d ↗
6. Park, W., Lu, D. & Ahn, S. Plasmon enhancement of luminescence upconversion. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 2940–2962 (2015).10.1039/C5CS00050E ↗
7. Gu, M. et al. Nanoplasmonics: a frontier of photovoltaic solar cells. Nanophotonics 1, 235–248 (2012).10.1515/nanoph-2012-0180 ↗
8. Azzam, S. I. et al. Ten years of spasers and plasmonic nanolasers. Light Sci. Appl 9, 90 (2020).10.1038/s41377-020-0319-7 ↗
9. Abadeer, N. S. & Murphy, C. J. Recent progress in cancer thermal therapy using gold nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. C 120, 4691–4716 (2016).10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b11232 ↗
10. Xavier, J., Yu, D. S., Jones, C., Zossimova, E. & Vollmer, F. Quantum nanophotonic and nanoplasmonic sensing: towards quantum optical bioscience laboratories on chip. Nanophotonics 10, 1387–1435 (2021).10.1515/nanoph-2020-0593 ↗
11. Zhou, Z.-K. et al. Quantum plasmonics get applied. Prog. Quantum Electron. 65, 1–20 (2019).10.1016/j.pquantelec.2019.04.002 ↗
12. Henry, A.-I. et al. Correlated structure and optical property studies of plasmonic nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. C 115, 9291–9305 (2011).10.1021/jp2010309 ↗
13. Carleo, G. et al. Machine learning and the physical sciences. Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 045002 (2019).10.1103/RevModPhys.91.045002 ↗
14. Butler, K. T., Davies, D. W., Cartwright, H., Isayev, O. & Walsh, A. Machine learning for molecular and materials science. Nature 559, 547–555 (2018).10.1038/s41586-018-0337-2 ↗
15. Brown, K. A., Brittman, S., Maccaferri, N., Jariwala, D. & Celano, U. Machine learning in nanoscience: big data at small scales. Nano Lett. 20, 2–10 (2020).10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b04090 ↗
16. Vahidzadeh, E. & Shankar, K. Artificial neural network-based prediction of the optical properties of spherical core–shell plasmonic metastructures. Nanomaterials 11, 633 (2021).10.3390/nano11030633 ↗
17. Malkiel, I. et al. Plasmonic nanostructure design and characterization via deep learning. Light Sci. Appl. 7, 60 (2018).10.1038/s41377-018-0060-7 ↗
18. Kim, W. et al. Paper-based surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy for diagnosing prenatal diseases in women. ACS Nano 12, 7100–7108 (2018).10.1021/acsnano.8b02917 ↗
19. Lussier, F., Missirlis, D., Spatz, J. P. & Masson, J. F. Machine-learning-driven surface-enhanced Raman scattering optophysiology reveals multiplexed metabolite gradients near cells. ACS Nano 13, 1403–1411 (2019).
20. Shi, H. et al. Setting up a surface-enhanced Raman scattering database for artificial-intelligence-based label-free discrimination of tumor suppressor genes. Anal. Chem. 90, 14216–14221 (2018).10.1021/acs.analchem.8b03080 ↗
21. Tao, H. et al. Nanoparticle synthesis assisted by machine learning. Nat. Rev. Mater. 6, 701–716 (2021).10.1038/s41578-021-00337-5 ↗
22. Yen, S.-C., Chen, Y.-L. & Su, Y.-H. Materials genome evolution of surface plasmon resonance characteristics of Au nanoparticles decorated ZnO nanorods. APL Mater. 8, 091109 (2020).10.1063/5.0023540 ↗
23. Leong, Y. X. et al. Surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) taster: a machine-learning-driven multireceptor platform for multiplex profiling of wine flavors. Nano Lett. 21, 2642–2649 (2021).10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c00416 ↗
24. Macias, G. et al. Whisky tasting using a bimetallic nanoplasmonic tongue. Nanoscale 11, 15216–15223 (2019).10.1039/C9NR04583J ↗
25. Zhang, T. et al. Efficient spectrum prediction and inverse design for plasmonic waveguide systems based on artificial neural networks. Photon. Res. 7, 368–380 (2019).10.1364/PRJ.7.000368 ↗
26. Nelson, M. D. & Di Vece, M. Using a neural network to improve the optical absorption in halide perovskite layers containing core-shells silver nanoparticles. Nanomaterials 9, 437 (2019).10.3390/nano9030437 ↗
27. He, J., He, C., Zheng, C., Wang, Q. & Ye, J. Plasmonic nanoparticle simulations and inverse design using machine learning. Nanoscale 11, 17444–17459 (2019).10.1039/C9NR03450A ↗
28. Roberts, N. B. & Keshavarz Hedayati, M. A deep learning approach to the forward prediction and inverse design of plasmonic metasurface structural color. Appl. Phys. Lett. 119, 061101 (2021).10.1063/5.0055733 ↗
29. Wang, M., Wang, T., Cai, P. & Chen, X. Nanomaterials discovery and design through machine learning. Small Methods 3, 1900025 (2019).10.1002/smtd.201900025 ↗
30. Kelly, K. L., Coronado, E., Zhao, L. L. & Schatz, G. C. The optical properties of metal nanoparticles: the influence of size, shape, and dielectric environment. J. Phys. Chem. B 107, 668–677 (2003).10.1021/jp026731y ↗
31. Li, X., Shu, J., Gu, W. & Gao, L. Deep neural network for plasmonic sensor modeling. Opt. Mater. Express 9, 3857–3862 (2019).10.1364/OME.9.003857 ↗
32. Pashkov, D. M. et al. Quantitative analysis of the UV–vis spectra for gold nanoparticles powered by supervised machine learning. J. Phys. Chem. C 125, 8656–8666 (2021).10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c10680 ↗
33. Arzola-Flores, J. A. & Gonzalez, A. L. Machine learning for predicting the surface plasmon resonance of perfect and concave gold nanocubes. J. Phys. Chem. C 124, 25447–25454 (2020).10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c05995 ↗
34. Hiszpanski, A. M. et al. Nanomaterial synthesis insights from machine learning of scientific articles by extracting, structuring, and visualizing knowledge. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 60, 2876–2887 (2020).10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00199 ↗
35. Ashalley, E. et al. Multitask deep-learning-based design of chiral plasmonic metamaterials. Photon. Res. 8, 1213–1225 (2020).10.1364/PRJ.388253 ↗
36. Sajedian, I., Badloe, T. & Rho, J. Optimisation of colour generation from dielectric nanostructures using reinforcement learning. Opt. Express 27, 5874–5883 (2019).10.1364/OE.27.005874 ↗
37. Liu, D., Tan, Y., Khoram, E. & Yu, Z. Training deep neural networks for the inverse design of nanophotonic structures. ACS Photonics 5, 1365–1369 (2018).10.1021/acsphotonics.7b01377 ↗
38. Kasani, S., Curtin, K. & Wu, N. A review of 2D and 3D plasmonic nanostructure array patterns: fabrication, light management and sensing applications. Nanophotonics 8, 2065–2089 (2019).10.1515/nanoph-2019-0158 ↗
39. Glotzer, S. C. & Solomon, M. J. Anisotropy of building blocks and their assembly into complex structures. Nat. Mater. 6, 557–562 (2007).10.1038/nmat1949 ↗
40. MacFarlane, R. J. et al. Nanoparticle superlattice engineering with DNA. Science 334, 204–208 (2011).10.1126/science.1210493 ↗
41. Tao, H. C. et al. Nanoparticle synthesis assisted by machine learning. Nat. Rev. Mater. 6, 701–716 (2021).10.1038/s41578-021-00337-5 ↗
42. Ringe, E., Van Duyne, R. P. & Marks, L. D. Kinetic and thermodynamic modified Wulff constructions for twinned nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. C 117, 15859–15870 (2013).10.1021/jp401566m ↗
43. Salley, D. et al. A nanomaterials discovery robot for the Darwinian evolution of shape programmable gold nanoparticles. Nat. Commun. 11, 2771 (2020).10.1038/s41467-020-16501-4 ↗
44. Pinho, B. & Torrente-Murciano, L. Dial-a-particle: precise manufacturing of plasmonic nanoparticles based on early growth information - redefining automation for slow material synthesis. Adv. Energy Mater. 11, 2100918 (2021).10.1002/aenm.202100918 ↗
45. Britton, J. & Raston, C. L. Multi-step continuous-flow synthesis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 46, 1250–1271 (2017).10.1039/C6CS00830E ↗
46. Volk, A. A., Epps, R. W. & Abolhasani, M. Accelerated development of colloidal nanomaterials enabled by modular microfluidic reactors: toward autonomous robotic experimentation. Adv. Mater. 33, 2004495 (2021).10.1002/adma.202004495 ↗
47. Coley, C. W., Green, W. H. & Jensen, K. F. Machine learning in computer-aided synthesis planning. Acc. Chem. Res. 51, 1281–1289 (2018).10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00087 ↗
48. Copp, S. M., Bogdanov, P., Debord, M., Singh, A. & Gwinn, E. Base motif recognition and design of DNA templates for fluorescent silver clusters by machine learning. Adv. Mater. 26, 5839–5845 (2014).10.1002/adma.201401402 ↗
49. Copp, S. M. et al. Fluorescence color by data-driven design of genomic silver clusters. ACS Nano 12, 8240–8247 (2018).10.1021/acsnano.8b03404 ↗
50. Adorf, C. S., Moore, T. C., Melle, Y. J. U. & Glotzer, S. C. Analysis of self-assembly pathways with unsupervised machine learning algorithms. J. Phys. Chem. B 124, 69–78 (2020).10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b09621 ↗
51. Dijkstra, M. & Luijten, E. From predictive modelling to machine learning and reverse engineering of colloidal self-assembly. Nat. Mater. 20, 762–773 (2021).10.1038/s41563-021-01014-2 ↗
52. Nette, J., Howes, P. D. & deMello, A. J. Microfluidic synthesis of luminescent and plasmonic nanoparticles: fast, efficient, and data-rich. Adv. Mater. Technol. 5, 2000060 (2020).10.1002/admt.202000060 ↗
53. Wu, C.-C., Pan, F. & Su, Y.-H. Surface plasmon resonance of gold nano-sea-urchins controlled by machine-learning-based regulation in seed-mediated growth. Adv. Photon. Res. 2, 2170031 (2021).10.1002/adpr.202170031 ↗
54. Mekki-Berrada, F. et al. Two-step machine learning enables optimized nanoparticle synthesis. npj Comput. Mater. 7, 55 (2021).10.1038/s41524-021-00520-w ↗
55. Dong, B. et al. Synthesis of monodisperse spherical AgNPs by ultrasound-intensified Lee-Meisel method, and quick evaluation via machine learning. Ultrason. Sonochem. 73, 105485 (2021).10.1016/j.ultsonch.2021.105485 ↗
56. Fernandes, D. L. A. et al. Green microfluidic synthesis of monodisperse silver nanoparticles via genetic algorithm optimization. RSC Adv. 6, 95693–95697 (2016).10.1039/C6RA20877K ↗
57. Fukada, K. & Seyama, M. Microfluidic devices controlled by machine learning with failure experiments. Anal. Chem. 94, 7060–7065 (2022).10.1021/acs.analchem.2c00378 ↗
58. Moen, E. et al. Deep learning for cellular image analysis. Nat. Methods 16, 1233–1246 (2019).10.1038/s41592-019-0403-1 ↗
59. Hopper, E. R. et al. Size control in the colloidal synthesis of plasmonic magnesium nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. C 126, 563–577 (2022).10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c07544 ↗
60. Woehrle, G. H., Hutchinson, J. E., Ozkar, S. & Finke, R. G. Analysis of nanoparticle transmission electron microscopy data using a public- domain image-processing program, image. Turk. J. Chem. 30, 1–13 (2006).
61. Wang, X. et al. Autodetect-mNP: an unsupervised machine learning algorithm for automated analysis of transmission electron microscope images of metal nanoparticles. JACS Au 1, 316–327 (2021).10.1021/jacsau.0c00030 ↗
62. Lee, B. et al. Statistical characterization of the morphologies of nanoparticles through machine learning based electron microscopy image analysis. ACS Nano 14, 17125–17133 (2020).10.1021/acsnano.0c06809 ↗
63. Xu, S. et al. Deep learning analysis of polaritonic wave images. ACS Nano 15, 18182–18191 (2021).10.1021/acsnano.1c07011 ↗
64. Yao, L., Ou, Z., Luo, B., Xu, C. & Chen, Q. Machine learning to reveal nanoparticle dynamics from liquid-phase TEM videos. ACS Cent. Sci. 6, 1421–1430 (2020).10.1021/acscentsci.0c00430 ↗
65. Zhong, Y., Li, C., Zhou, H. & Wang, G. Developing noise-resistant three-dimensional single particle tracking using deep neural networks. Anal. Chem. 90, 10748–10757 (2018).10.1021/acs.analchem.8b01334 ↗
66. Moon, G., Son, T., Lee, H. & Kim, D. Deep learning approach for enhanced detection of surface plasmon scattering. Anal. Chem. 91, 9538–9545 (2019).10.1021/acs.analchem.9b00683 ↗
67. Ma, Y. P., Li, Q., Luo, J. B., Huang, C. Z. & Zhou, J. Weak reaction scatterometry of plasmonic resonance light scattering with machine learning. Anal. Chem. 93, 12131–12138 (2021).10.1021/acs.analchem.1c02813 ↗
68. Horgan, C. C. et al. High-throughput molecular imaging via deep-learning-enabled Raman spectroscopy. Anal. Chem. 93, 15850–15860 (2021).10.1021/acs.analchem.1c02178 ↗
69. García de Abajo, F. J. Optical excitations in electron microscopy. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 209–275 (2010).10.1103/RevModPhys.82.209 ↗
70. Nelayah, J. et al. Mapping surface plasmons on a single metallic nanoparticle. Nat. Phys. 3, 348–353 (2007).10.1038/nphys575 ↗
71. Collins, S. M. & Midgley, P. A. Progress and opportunities in EELS and EDS tomography. Ultramicroscopy 180, 133–141 (2017).10.1016/j.ultramic.2017.01.003 ↗
72. Nicoletti, O. et al. Three-dimensional imaging of localized surface plasmon resonances of metal nanoparticles. Nature 502, 80–84 (2013).10.1038/nature12469 ↗
73. Dobigeon, N. & Brun, N. Spectral mixture analysis of EELS spectrum-images. Ultramicroscopy 120, 25–34 (2012).10.1016/j.ultramic.2012.05.006 ↗
74. Altmann, Y., McLaughlin, S. & Hero, A. Robust linear spectral unmixing using anomaly detection. IEEE Trans. Comput. Imaging 1, 74–85 (2015).10.1109/TCI.2015.2455411 ↗
75. Bosman, M., Watanabe, M., Alexander, D. T. L. & Keast, V. J. Mapping chemical and bonding information using multivariate analysis of electron energy-loss spectrum images. Ultramicroscopy 106, 1024–1032 (2006).10.1016/j.ultramic.2006.04.016 ↗
76. Kalinin, S. V. et al. Separating physically distinct mechanisms in complex infrared plasmonic nanostructures via machine learning enhanced electron energy loss spectroscopy. Adv. Opt. Mater. 9, 2001808 (2021).10.1002/adom.202001808 ↗
77. Linic, S., Aslam, U., Boerigter, C. & Morabito, M. Photochemical transformations on plasmonic metal nanoparticles. Nat. Mater. 14, 567–576 (2015).10.1038/nmat4281 ↗
78. Mukherjee, S. et al. Hot-electron-induced dissociation of H2 on gold nanoparticles supported on SiO2. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 64–67 (2014).10.1021/ja411017b ↗
79. van Schrojenstein Lantman, E. M., Deckert-Gaudig, T., Mank, A. J. G., Deckert, V. & Weckhuysen, B. M. Catalytic processes monitored at the nanoscale with tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 583–586 (2012).10.1038/nnano.2012.131 ↗
80. Linic, S., Christopher, P. & Ingram, D. B. Plasmonic-metal nanostructures for efficient conversion of solar to chemical energy. Nat. Mater. 10, 911–921 (2011).10.1038/nmat3151 ↗
81. Masood, H., Toe, C. Y., Teoh, W. Y., Sethu, V. & Amal, R. Machine learning for accelerated discovery of solar photocatalysts. ACS Catal. 9, 11774–11787 (2019).10.1021/acscatal.9b02531 ↗
82. Martirez, J. M. P., Bao, J. L. & Carter, E. A. First-principles insights into plasmon-induced catalysis. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 72, 99–119 (2021).10.1146/annurev-physchem-061020-053501 ↗
83. Rück, M., Garlyyev, B., Mayr, F., Bandarenka, A. S. & Gagliardi, A. Oxygen reduction activities of strained platinum core–shell electrocatalysts predicted by machine learning. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 11, 1773–1780 (2020).10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c00214 ↗
84. Chen, C. & Li, S. Z. Valence electron density-dependent pseudopermittivity for nonlocal effects in optical properties of metallic nanoparticles. ACS Photonics 5, 2295–2304 (2018).10.1021/acsphotonics.8b00122 ↗
85. Hu, W. et al. Machine learning protocol for surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 10, 6026–6031 (2019).10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b02517 ↗
86. Chu, W., Saidi, W. A. & Prezhdo, O. V. Long-lived hot electron in a metallic particle for plasmonics and catalysis: ab initio nonadiabatic molecular dynamics with machine learning. ACS Nano 14, 10608–10615 (2020).10.1021/acsnano.0c04736 ↗
87. Sun, B., Fernandez, M. & Barnard, A. S. Machine learning for silver nanoparticle electron transfer property prediction. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 57, 2413–2423 (2017).10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00272 ↗
88. Nesfchi, M. M. et al. Fabrication of plasmonic nanoparticles/cobalt doped TiO2 nanosheets for degradation of tetracycline and modeling the process by artificial intelligence techniques. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 122, 105465 (2021).10.1016/j.mssp.2020.105465 ↗
89. Mikolajczyk, A. et al. A chemoinformatics approach for the characterization of hybrid nanomaterials: safer and efficient design perspective. Nanoscale 11, 11808–11818 (2019).10.1039/C9NR01162E ↗
90. Szczerbiński, J., Gyr, L., Kaeslin, J. & Zenobi, R. Plasmon-driven photocatalysis leads to products known from e-beam and x-ray-induced surface chemistry. Nano Lett. 18, 6740–6749 (2018).10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b02426 ↗
91. Domulevicz, L., Jeong, H., Paul, N. K., Gomez-Diaz, J. S. & Hihath, J. Multidimensional characterization of single-molecule dynamics in a plasmonic nanocavity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 16436–16441 (2021).10.1002/anie.202100886 ↗
92. Tian, C. et al. Deep learning on image denoising: an overview. Neural Netw. 131, 251–275 (2020).10.1016/j.neunet.2020.07.025 ↗
93. Adir, O. et al. Integrating artificial intelligence and nanotechnology for precision cancer medicine. Adv. Mater. 32, 1901989 (2020).10.1002/adma.201901989 ↗
94. Cui, F., Yue, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Z. & Zhou, H. S. Advancing biosensors with machine learning. ACS Sens. 5, 3346–3364 (2020).10.1021/acssensors.0c01424 ↗
95. Jin, X., Liu, C., Xu, T., Su, L. & Zhang, X. Artificial intelligence biosensors: challenges and prospects. Biosens. Bioelectron. 165, 112412 (2020).10.1016/j.bios.2020.112412 ↗
96. Masson, J. F. Surface plasmon resonance clinical biosensors for medical diagnostics. ACS Sens. 2, 16–30 (2017).10.1021/acssensors.6b00763 ↗
97. Gomes, J. C. M., Souza, L. C. & Oliveira, L. C. SmartSPR sensor: machine learning approaches to create intelligent surface plasmon based sensors. Biosens. Bioelectron. 172, 112760 (2021).10.1016/j.bios.2020.112760 ↗
98. Thadson, K., Visitsattapongse, S. & Pechprasarn, S. Deep learning-based single-shot phase retrieval algorithm for surface plasmon resonance microscope based refractive index sensing application. Sci. Rep. 11, 16289 (2021).10.1038/s41598-021-95593-4 ↗
99. Song, M. K., Chen, S. X., Hu, P. P., Huang, C. Z. & Zhou, J. Automated plasmonic resonance scattering imaging analysis via deep learning. Anal. Chem. 93, 2619–2626 (2021).10.1021/acs.analchem.0c04763 ↗
100. Weng, S. Z. et al. Deep learning networks for the recognition and quantitation of surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Analyst 145, 4827–4835 (2020).10.1039/D0AN00492H ↗