Microwave-driven coherent operation of a semiconductor quantum dot charge qubit
Source abstract
Abstract
An intuitive realization of a qubit is an electron charge at two well-defined positions of a double quantum dot. This qubit is simple and has the potential for high-speed operation because of its strong coupling to electric fields. However, charge noise also couples strongly to this qubit, resulting in rapid dephasing at all but one special operating point called the 'sweet spot'. In previous studies d.c. voltage pulses have been used to manipulate semiconductor charge qubits but did not achieve high-fidelity control, because d.c. gating requires excursions away from the sweet spot. Here, by using resonant a.c. microwave driving we achieve fast (greater than gigahertz) and universal single qubit rotations of a semiconductor charge qubit. The Z-axis rotations of the qubit are well protected at the sweet spot, and we demonstrate the same protection for rotations about arbitrary axes in the X-Y plane of the qubit Bloch sphere. We characterize the qubit operation using two tomographic approaches: standard process tomography and gate set tomography. Both methods consistently yield process fidelities greater than 86% with respect to a universal set of unitary single-qubit operations.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Quantum and electron transport phenomena · Quantum Information and Cryptography · Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Cao, G. et al. Ultrafast universal quantum control of a quantum-dot charge qubit using Landau–Zener–Stückelberg interference. Nature Commun. 4, 1401 (2013).10.1038/ncomms2412 ↗
2. Shinkai, G., Hayashi, T., Ota, T. & Fujisawa, T. Correlated coherent oscillations in coupled semiconductor charge qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 056802 (2009).10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.056802 ↗
3. Hayashi, T., Fujisawa, T., Cheong, H. D., Jeong, Y. H. & Hirayama, Y. Coherent manipulation of electronic states in a double quantum dot. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 226804 (2003).10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.226804 ↗
4. Nakamura, Y., Pashkin, Y. A. & Tsai, J. S. Coherent control of macroscopic quantum states in a single-Cooper-pair box. Nature 398, 786–788 (1999).10.1038/19718 ↗
5. Petersson, K. D., Petta, J. R., Lu, H. & Gossard, A. C. Quantum coherence in a one-electron semiconductor charge qubit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 246804 (2010).10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.246804 ↗
6. Dovzhenko, Y. et al. Nonadiabatic quantum control of a semiconductor charge qubit. Phys. Rev. B 84, 161302 (2011).10.1103/PhysRevB.84.161302 ↗
7. Shi, Z. et al. Coherent quantum oscillations and echo measurements of a Si charge qubit. Phys. Rev. B 88, 075416 (2013).10.1103/PhysRevB.88.075416 ↗
8. Gorman, J., Hasko, D. G. & Williams, D. A. Charge-qubit operation of an isolated double quantum dot. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 090502 (2005).10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.090502 ↗
9. Nielsen, M. A. & Chuang, I. L. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2000).
10. Chow, J. M. et al. Randomized benchmarking and process tomography for gate errors in a solid-state qubit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 090502 (2009).10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.090502 ↗
11. Blume-Kohout, R. et al. (2013). Robust, self-consistent closed-form tomography of quantum logic gates on a trapped ion qubit. Preprint http://arxiv.org/abs/1310.4492 .
12. Vion, D. et al. Manipulating the quantum state of an electrical circuit. Science 296, 886–889 (2002).10.1126/science.1069372 ↗
13. Chow, J. M. et al. Optimized driving of superconducting artificial atoms for improved single-qubit gates. Phys. Rev. A 82, 040305 (2010).10.1103/PhysRevA.82.040305 ↗
14. Fedorov, A., Steffen, L., Baur, M., da Silva, M. P. & Wallraff, A. Implementation of a Toffoli gate with superconducting circuits. Nature 481, 170–172 (2012).10.1038/nature10713 ↗
15. DiVincenzo, D. P. The physical implementation of quantum computation. Fortschr. Phys. 48, 771–783 (2000).10.1002/1521-3978(200009)48:9/11<771::AID-PROP771>3.0.CO;2-E ↗
16. Koppens, F. H. L. et al. Driven coherent oscillations of a single electron spin in a quantum dot. Nature 442, 766–771 (2006).10.1038/nature05065 ↗
17. Koppens, F. H. L., Nowack, K. C. & Vandersypen, L. M. K. Spin echo of a single electron spin in a quantum dot. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 236802 (2008).10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.236802 ↗
18. Pla, J. J. et al. A single-atom electron spin qubit in silicon. Nature 489, 541–545 (2012).10.1038/nature11449 ↗
19. Nowack, K. C., Koppens, F. H. L., Nazarov, Y. V. & Vandersypen, L. M. K. Coherent control of a single electron spin with electric fields. Science 318, 1430–1433 (2007).10.1126/science.1148092 ↗
20. van den Berg, J. W. G. et al. Fast spin–orbit qubit in an indium antimonide nanowire. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 066806 (2013).10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.066806 ↗
21. Petersson, K. D. et al. Circuit quantum electrodynamics with a spin qubit. Nature 490, 380–383 (2012).10.1038/nature11559 ↗
22. Kawakami, E. et al. Electrical control of a long-lived spin qubit in a Si/SiGe quantum dot. Nature Nanotech. 9, 666–670 (2014).10.1038/nnano.2014.153 ↗
23. Medford, J. et al. Quantum-dot-based resonant exchange qubit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 050501 (2013).10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.050501 ↗
24. Shi, Z. et al. Fast coherent manipulation of three-electron states in a double quantum dot. Nature Commun. 5, 3020 (2014).10.1038/ncomms4020 ↗
25. Kim, D. et al. Quantum control and process tomography of a semiconductor quantum dot hybrid qubit. Nature 511, 70–74 (2014).10.1038/nature13407 ↗
26. Shore, B. W. The Theory of Coherent Atomic Excitation (Wiley, 1990).
27. Vandersypen, L. M. K. & Chuang, I. L. NMR techniques for quantum control and computation. Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 1037–1069 (2005).10.1103/RevModPhys.76.1037 ↗
28. Dial, O. E. et al. Charge noise spectroscopy using coherent exchange oscillations in a singlet–triplet qubit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 146804 (2013).10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.146804 ↗
29. Magesan, E., Blume-Kohout, R. & Emerson, J. Gate fidelity fluctuations and quantum process invariants. Phys. Rev. A 84, 012309 (2011).10.1103/PhysRevA.84.012309 ↗
30. Simmons, C. B. et al. Tunable spin loading and T1 of a silicon spin qubit measured by single-shot readout. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 156804 (2011).10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.156804 ↗