journal article·2018-10Open access

Superconducting gatemon qubit based on a proximitized two-dimensional electron gas

Lucas Casparis, Malcolm R. Connolly, Morten Kjaergaard, Natalie J. Pearson, Anders Kringhøj, Thorvald W. Larsen, Ferdinand Kuemmeth, Tiantian Wang, Candice Thomas, Sergei Gronin, Geoffrey C. Gardner, Michael J. Manfra, Charles M. Marcus, Karl D. Petersson

Nature Nanotechnology· Volume 13· Issue 10

Abstract

The coherent tunnelling of Cooper pairs across Josephson junctions (JJs) generates a nonlinear inductance that is used extensively in quantum information processors based on superconducting circuits, from setting qubit transition frequencies1 and interqubit coupling strengths2 to the gain of parametric amplifiers3 for quantum-limited readout. The inductance is either set by tailoring the metal oxide dimensions of single JJs, or magnetically tuned by parallelizing multiple JJs in superconducting quantum interference devices with local current-biased flux lines. JJs based on superconductor-semiconductor hybrids represent a tantalizing all-electric alternative. The gatemon is a recently developed transmon variant that employs locally gated nanowire superconductor-semiconductor JJs for qubit control4,5. Here we go beyond proof-of-concept and demonstrate that semiconducting channels etched from a wafer-scale two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG) are a suitable platform for building a scalable gatemon-based quantum computer. We show that 2DEG gatemons meet the requirements6 by performing voltage-controlled single qubit rotations and two-qubit swap operations. We measure qubit coherence times up to ~2 μs, limited by dielectric loss in the 2DEG substrate.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Quantum and electron transport phenomena · Quantum Information and Cryptography · Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. Koch, J. et al. Charge-insensitive qubit design derived from the Cooper pair box. Phys. Rev. A. 76, 042319 (2007).10.1103/PhysRevA.76.042319 ↗
2. Chen, Y. et al. Qubit architecture with high coherence and fast tunable coupling. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 220502 (2014).10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.220502 ↗
3. Castellanos-Beltran, M. A. & Lehnert, K. W. Widely tunable parametric amplifier based on a superconducting quantum interference device array resonator. Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 083509 (2007).10.1063/1.2773988 ↗
4. Larsen, T. W. et al. A semiconductor nanowire-based superconducting qubit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 127001 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.127001 ↗
5. de Lange, G. et al. Realization of microwave quantum circuits using hybrid superconducting–semiconducting nanowire Josephson elements. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 127002 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.127002 ↗
6. Vincenzo, D. The physical implementation of quantum computation. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0002077 (2000).10.1002/3527603182.ch1 ↗
7. Clarke, J. & Wilhelm, F. K. Superconducting quantum bits. Nature 453, 1031–1042 (2008).10.1038/nature07128 ↗
8. Sheldon, S., Magesan, E., Chow, J. M. & Gambetta, J. M. Procedure for systematically tuning up cross-talk in the cross-resonance gate. Phys. Rev. A. 93, 060302 (2016).10.1103/PhysRevA.93.060302 ↗
9. Hutchings, M. D. et al. Tunable superconducting qubits with flux-independent coherence. Phys. Rev. Appl 8, 044003 (2017).10.1103/PhysRevApplied.8.044003 ↗
10. Kelly, J. et al. State preservation by repetitive error detection in a superconducting quantum circuit. Nature 519, 66–69 (2015).10.1038/nature14270 ↗
11. Neill, C. et al. A blueprint for demonstrating quantum supremacy with superconducting qubits. Science 360, 195–199 (2018).10.1126/science.aao4309 ↗
12. Rosenberg, D. et al. 3D integrated superconducting qubits. Quantum Inf. 3, 42 (2017).10.1038/s41534-017-0044-0 ↗
13. Kjaergaard, M. et al. Transparent semiconductor–superconductor interface and induced gap in an epitaxial heterostructure Josephson junction. Phys. Rev. Appl. 7, 034029 (2017).10.1103/PhysRevApplied.7.034029 ↗
14. Luthi, F. et al. Evolution of nanowire transmons and their quantum coherence in magnetic field. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 100502 (2018).10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.100502 ↗
15. Casparis, L. et al. Gatemon benchmarking and two-qubit operations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 150505 (2016).10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.150505 ↗
16. Shabani, J. et al. Two-dimensional epitaxial superconductor–semiconductor heterostructures: a platform for topological superconducting networks. Phys. Rev. B 93, 155402 (2016).10.1103/PhysRevB.93.155402 ↗
17. Kringhøj, A. et al. Anharmonicity of a superconducting qubit with a few-mode Josephson junction. Phys. Rev. B 97, 060508 (2018).10.1103/PhysRevB.97.060508 ↗
18. Abay, S. High critical-current superconductor-InAs nanowire–superconductor junctions. Nano. Lett. 12, 5622 (2012).10.1021/nl302740f ↗
19. Wallraff, A. et al. Strong coupling of a single photon to a superconducting qubit using circuit quantum electrodynamics. Nature 431, 162–167 (2004).10.1038/nature02851 ↗
20. O’Malley, P. J. J. et al. Qubit metrology of ultralow phase noise using randomized benchmarking. Phys. Rev. Appl. 3, 044009 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevApplied.3.044009 ↗
21. Bylander, J. et al. Noise spectroscopy through dynamical decoupling with a superconducting flux qubit. Nat. Phys. 7, 565–570 (2011).10.1038/nphys1994 ↗
22. Barends, R. et al. Coherent Josephson qubit suitable for scalable quantum integrated circuits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 080502 (2013).10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.080502 ↗
23. Krupka, J., Hartnett, J. G. & Piersa, M. Permittivity and microwave absorption of semi-insulating InP at microwave frequencies. Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 112112 (2011).10.1063/1.3570689 ↗
24. Frey, T. S. Interaction between Quantum Dots and Superconducting Microwave Resonators. PhD thesis, ETH Zurich (2013).
25. Bruno, A. et al. Reducing intrinsic loss in superconducting resonators by surface treatment and deep etching of silicon substrates. Appl. Phys. Lett. 106, 182601 (2015).10.1063/1.4919761 ↗
26. Dial, O. E. et al. Charge noise spectroscopy using coherent exchange oscillations in a singlet–triplet qubit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 146804 (2013).10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.146804 ↗
27. Rol, M. A. et al. Restless tuneup of high-fidelity qubit gates. Phys. Rev. Appl. 7, 041001 (2017).10.1103/PhysRevApplied.7.041001 ↗
28. Majer, J. et al. Coupling superconducting qubits via a cavity bus. Nature 449, 443–447 (2007).10.1038/nature06184 ↗
29. Hofheinz, M. et al. Synthesizing arbitrary quantum states in a superconducting resonator. Nature 459, 546–549 (2009).10.1038/nature08005 ↗
30. Casparis, L. et al. Voltage-controlled superconducting quantum bus. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.01327 (2018).
31. Cassidy, M. C. et al. Demonstration of an a.c. Josephson junction laser. Science 355, 939–942 (2017).10.1126/science.aah6640 ↗
32. Versluis, R. et al. Scalable quantum circuit and control for a superconducting surface code. Phys. Rev. Appl. 8, 034021 (2017).10.1103/PhysRevApplied.8.034021 ↗
33. Ward, D. R., Savage, D. E., Lagally, M. G., Coppersmith, S. N. & Eriksson, M. A. Integration of on-chip field-effect transistor switches with dopantless Si/SiGe quantum dots for high-throughput testing. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 213107 (2013).10.1063/1.4807768 ↗
34. Al-Taie, H. et al. Cryogenic on-chip multiplexer for the study of quantum transport in 256 split-gate devices. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 243102 (2013).10.1063/1.4811376 ↗
35. Hornibrook, J. M. et al. Cryogenic control architecture for large-scale quantum computing. Phys. Rev. Appl. 3, 024010 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevApplied.3.024010 ↗
36. Macklin, C. et al. A near-quantum-limited Josephson traveling-wave parametric amplifier. Science 350, 307–310 (2015).10.1126/science.aaa8525 ↗